journal article·2023-06Open access

Mapping internal strain fields of fused filament fabrication metal filled polylactic acid structure using digital volume correlation

Abhinav Goyal, Cristofaro S Timpano, Garrett W Melenka

Journal of Composite Materials· Volume 57· Issue 14

Abstract

With the advancement in Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), its application is increasing widely across different industries such as aeronautical, biomedical, robotics, etc. The internal structure is becoming more complex and intricate with varying materials of reinforcement which are used to improve mechanical properties. Current measurement techniques like Digital Image Correlation (DIC) are non-destructive testing methods that do not provide enough information on the behaviour of internal microstructure for anisotropic FFF materials. Digital Volume Correlation (DVC) is non-destructive testing technique which provides full field internal 3D deformation and strain fields. Copper particle filled PLA samples manufactured using FFF method with 20, 40, 60 and 80 infill percentages were loaded in tension inside Micro-CT. X-rays were passed through the sample to get a volumetric dataset for different loadings. Using DVC method on the dataset, internal displacement and strain fields were generated for 20, 40, 60 and 80 infill percentage FFF sample.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.04910.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.049 ↗
2. Jyothish Kumar L · 2016 · 39
3. 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.00510.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005 ↗
4. 10.1007/S40964-016-0009-410.1007/S40964-016-0009-4 ↗
5. 10.1108/1355254101101169510.1108/13552541011011695 ↗
6. 10.1016/J.JMBBM.2019.10360810.1016/J.JMBBM.2019.103608 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.10203010.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.102030 ↗
9. 10.3390/JMMP503006810.3390/JMMP5030068 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.10008410.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100084 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-3-540-68993-5_1/COVER10.1007/978-3-540-68993-5_1/COVER ↗
12. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2021.10648710.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2021.106487 ↗
13. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2021.10918410.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2021.109184 ↗
14. 10.1016/J.POLYMER.2017.03.01110.1016/J.POLYMER.2017.03.011 ↗
15. 10.1007/S11837-015-1367-Y10.1007/S11837-015-1367-Y ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.00210.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2016.11.00710.1016/J.ADDMA.2016.11.007 ↗
18. 10.1007/S00170-020-06138-410.1007/S00170-020-06138-4 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11340-018-0390-710.1007/s11340-018-0390-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2020.10618910.1016/J.OPTLASENG.2020.106189 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0232355510.1007/BF02323555 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594510.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105945 ↗
23. 10.1177/0021998321102050010.1177/00219983211020500 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11340-020-00607-310.1007/s11340-020-00607-3 ↗
25. 10.1007/S11340-010-9418-3/FIGURES/610.1007/S11340-010-9418-3/FIGURES/6 ↗
26. 10.3390/POLYM1308121310.3390/POLYM13081213 ↗
27. 10.1002/APP.5016210.1002/APP.50162 ↗
28. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2021.10880910.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2021.108809 ↗
29. 10.1016/J.SNA.2021.11276410.1016/J.SNA.2021.112764 ↗