journal article·2021-01-01

Improved accuracy and precision of bioprinting through progressive cavity pump-controlled extrusion

Philipp Fisch, Martin Holub, Marcy Zenobi-Wong

Biofabrication· Volume 13· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract 3D bioprinting has seen a tremendous growth in recent years in a variety of fields such as tissue engineering, drug testing and regenerative medicine, which has led researchers and manufacturers to continuously advance and develop novel bioprinting techniques and materials. Although new bioprinting methods are emerging (e.g. contactless and volumetric bioprinting), micro-extrusion bioprinting remains the most widely used method. Micro-extrusion bioprinting, however, is still largely dependent on the conventional pneumatic extrusion process, which relies heavily on homogenous biomaterial inks and bioinks to maintain a constant material flow rate. Augmenting the functionality of the bioink with the addition of nanoparticles, cells or biopolymers can induce inhomogeneities resulting in uneven material flow during printing and/or clogging of the nozzle, leading to defects in the printed construct. In this work, we evaluated a novel extrusion technique based on a miniaturized progressive cavity pump (PCP) which allows precise control over the volumetric flow rate by positive displacement. We compared the accuracy and precision of this system to the pneumatic extrusion system and tested both systems for their effect on cell viability after extrusion. The PCP achieved a significantly higher accuracy and precision compared to the pneumatic system, while maintaining good viability. These improvements were independent of the bioink composition, printing speed or nozzle size. This study demonstrates the merit of precise extrusion-process control in bioprinting by PCPs and investigates their influence on process-induced cell damage. PCPs are a promising tool for bioprinting and could help provide standardized and validated bioprinted constructs while leaving the researcher more freedom in the design of the bioinks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004 ↗
2. Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers10.1002/ar.a.10057 ↗
3. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
4. Pereira · 2018 · 53510.1007/978-3-319-40498-1_12-1 ↗
5. Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d ↗
6. Process-induced cell damage: pneumatic versus screw-driven bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f53 ↗
7. A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 ↗
8. Screw extrusion based 3D printing, a novel additive manufacturing technology
9. Biofabrication of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035007 ↗
10. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y ↗
11. Development and thorough characterization of the processing steps of an ink for 3D printing for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2019.110510 ↗
12. Opportunities and challenges of translational 3D bioprinting10.1038/s41551-019-0471-7 ↗
13. Nelik · 1999
14. Progressive cavity pump systems: when precision and repeatability are vital
15. How microdispensing technology is changing medical device manufacturing
16. Multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing of composite materials10.1038/ncomms9643 ↗
17. 3D printing of materials with tunable failure via bioinspired mechanical gradients10.1002/adma.201705808 ↗
18. The progressing cavity pump: principle and capabilities
19. Understand progressing cavity pumps characteristics and a void abrasive wear
20. bioPrint: a liquid deposition printing system for natural actuators10.1089/3dp.2015.0033 ↗
21. xPrint: a modularized liquid printer for smart materials deposition10.1145/2858036.2858281 ↗
22. 3D printing of bacteria into functional complex materials10.1126/sciadv.aao6804 ↗
23. Bioprinting complex cartilaginous structures with clinically compliant biomaterials10.1002/adfm.201503423 ↗
24. Guidelines for standardization of bioprinting: a systematic study of process parameters and their effect on bioprinted structures10.1515/bnm-2016-0004 ↗
25. Engineering bioprintable alginate/gelatin composite hydrogels with tunable mechanical and cell adhesive properties to modulate tumor spheroid growth kinetics10.1088/1758-5090/ab3a5c ↗
26. Osteogenic and angiogenic tissue formation in high fidelity nanocomposite Laponite-gelatin bioinks10.1088/1758-5090/ab19fd ↗
27. Gelation of gellan—A review10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.01.004 ↗
28. Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003 ↗
29. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 ↗
30. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064 ↗
31. Wood-based nanocellulose and bioactive glass modified gelatin–alginate bioinks for 3D bioprinting of bone cells10.1088/1758-5090/ab0692 ↗
32. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
33. 3D culture of chondrocytes in gelatin hydrogels with different stiffness10.3390/polym8080269 ↗
34. Numerical modeling of the material deposition and contouring precision in fused deposition modeling
35. Mezger · 201410.1515/9783748600367 ↗
36. Koopmans · 1999 · 158
37. Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity10.1002/adhm.201500677 ↗
38. The role of cell seeding density and nutrient supply for articular cartilage tissue engineering with deformational loading10.1016/j.joca.2003.08.006 ↗
39. Engineering considerations on extrusion-based bioprinting: interactions of material behavior, mechanical forces and cells in the printing needle10.1088/1758-5090/ab7553 ↗
40. Effect of needle geometry on flow rate and cell damage in the dispensing-based biofabrication process10.1002/btpr.679 ↗
41. Bioinks for cartilage bioprinting applications10.1007/s10439-016-1704-5 ↗
42. Influence of flow behavior of alginate–cell suspensions on cell viability and proliferation10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0011 ↗
43. Effects of auricular chondrocyte expansion on neocartilage formation in photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid networks10.1089/ten.2006.12.2665 ↗
44. Human platelet lysate-based nanocomposite bioink for bioprinting hierarchical fibrillar structures10.1088/1758-5090/ab33e8 ↗
45. Printability of pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/ab0631 ↗
46. 3D bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head10.1088%2F1758-5090%2Fab2622 ↗
47. A brief review of extrusion-based tissue scaffold bio-printing10.1002/biot.201600671 ↗
48. A mathematical model on the resolution of extrusion bioprinting for the development of new bioinks10.3390/ma9090756 ↗
49. Three dimensional dynamics simulation of progressive cavity pump with stator of even thickness10.1016/j.petrol.2013.04.014 ↗