journal article·2018-01

Evaporation of clearcoat solvents from a rotary bell atomizer and its relationship with bell speed, flow rate, and electrostatic potential

R. Ray, P. Henshaw

Publisher page

Abstract

The relations between evaporation of clearcoat solvents and various operating parameters of the spray from a rotary bell atomizer were measured using a particle dynamic anemometer (PDA). The robot arm holding the spray applicator was moved relative to the PDA so that the volume flux at different parts of the spray could be measured. The difference in total flux between two planes, perpendicular to the spray axis, was considered to be equal to the evaporation. Evaporation was found to increase with increasing bell speed. Evaporation also increased with increasing coatings flow rate from 100 to 200 cm3/s flow rate, but not for a further increase to 300 cm3/s. Higher electrostatic potential, bell speed, and lower flow rate decrease the mean particle diameter. Particle mean velocity increases with increasing bell speed and flow rate. Coatings flow rate, bell speed, electrostatic potential, and the interaction between flow rate and bell speed were significant factors affecting evaporation rate. Of the former three, coatings flow rate was the most influential.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. Fraser, RP, Eisenklam, P, Dombrowski, N, Hasson, D, “Drop Formation from Rapidly Moving Liquid Sheets.” Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J., 8 (5) 672–680 (1962)10.1002/aic.690080522 ↗
2. Corbeels, PL, Senser, DW, Lefebvre, AH, “Atomization Characteristics of a High-Speed Rotary-Bell Paint Applicator.” Atomization Sprays, 2 (2) 87–89 (1992)10.1615/AtomizSpr.v2.i2.20 ↗
3. Wang, Z, “Experimental Investigation on Spray Characteristics of Aerodynamic Cooling Nozzle for Metal Cutting.” Proc. of 2009 International Conference on Energy and Environment Technology, vol. 3, pp. 323–326. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 200910.1109/ICEET.2009.543 ↗
4. Basu, KS, Zhou, J, Harding, A, Moncier, J, Williams, C, Baker, L, MacCreight, K, “Effect of Atomization and Rheology Control Sdditives on Particle Size and Appearance of Automotive Coatings.” Int. Soc. Coating Sci. Tech. Symposium (ISCST), 2010
5. Akafuah, NK, Salazar, AJ, Saito, K, “Infrared Thermography-Based Visualization of Droplet Transport in Liquid Sprays.” Infrared Phys. Technol., 53 (3) 218–226 (2010)10.1016/j.infrared.2009.12.002 ↗
6. Di Domenico, J, Henshaw, P, “The Effects of Basecoat Bell Application Parameters on Elements of Appearance for an Automotive Coatings Process.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 9 (6) 675–686 (2012)10.1007/s11998-012-9414-x ↗
7. Schwarzkopf, JD, Shakal, JS, Bonuccelli, C, “A New Method for Minimizing Volumetric Flux Errors Associated with PDPA Measurements in the Dilute Region of Full Cone Pressure Swirl Atomizers.” Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Liquid Atom. and Spray Systems (ICLASS), 2006
8. Ray, R, Henshaw, P, Biswas, N, Sak, C, “Evaporation of Water Spray from a Rotary Bell Atomizer using a Phase Doppler Anemometer.” Atomization Sprays, 25 (7) 539–551 (2015)10.1615/AtomizSpr.2015007991 ↗
9. Ray, R, Henshaw, P, Biswas, N, Sak, C, “Effects of Bell Speed and Flow Rate on Evaporation of Water Spray from a Rotary Bell Atomizer.” Innovative Coatings for Automotive Industry, 5 (2) 186–194 (2015)
10. Ray, R, Henshaw, P, “Relation Between Paint Application Parameters and Droplet Diameter: A Way to Improve Efficiency and Reduce Air Emissions.” Proc. of 25th Canadian Conference of Applied Mechanics, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, London, ON, June 1–4, 0062 2015
11. Dantec Dynamics BSA Flow Software V.4.10, Installation and User Guide, Denmark, 2006