journal article·2016-03-03

A size effect law for notched tensile strength of woven carbon/epoxy laminates

M. Kawai, S. Mitani

Advanced Composite Materials· Volume 25· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Specimen-size effect and notch-size effect on the tensile strength of woven fabric carbon/epoxy laminates are evaluated and modeled. For two different layups of [(0/90)12] and [(±45)2/(0/90)5]S, respectively, static tension tests were performed on two-dimensional geometrically similar unnotched and double-edge notched specimens scaled to three different sizes. Experimental results demonstrate that the notched strength of the woven CFRP laminates depend on the size of specimen as well as the size of notch. The ratio of notched strength to unnotched strength decreases as the length of notch increases, regardless of the size of specimen. For a given size of notch, the notch strength ratio becomes larger with decreasing size of specimen. A notch-size effect law is derived by means of the Neuber interpolation method. A specimen-size effect is embedded into the notch sensitivity parameter involved by the notch-size effect law to establish a size effect law that can cope with these two kinds of size effect. The engineering size effect law proposed can adequately describe the specimen-size effect as well as notch-size effect on the tensile strength of the woven CFRP laminates. It is also demonstrated that the size effect law allows determining the size independent fracture toughness on the basis of notched strengths of small specimens that fail in a quasi-brittle manner.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.04010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.040 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.03510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.035 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.010 ↗
4. Vinson JR · 1986
5. 10.1243/03093247V24418910.1243/03093247V244189 ↗
6. 10.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50012-710.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50012-7 ↗
7. 10.1177/07316844850040010210.1177/073168448500400102 ↗
8. 10.1177/00219983740080030310.1177/002199837400800303 ↗
9. 10.1177/00219983790130020610.1177/002199837901300206 ↗
10. 10.1177/00219983950290070610.1177/002199839502900706 ↗
11. Hull D · 1981
12. 10.1115/1.290422510.1115/1.2904225 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00404.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00404.x ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0232629210.1007/BF02326292 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.014 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831143479010.1177/0021998311434790 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00053-610.1016/S0266-3538(99)00053-6 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.002 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.280681210.1115/1.2806812 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518) ↗
21. Carpinteri A · Int. J. Fract · 1991 · 51 · 17510.1007/BF00033977 ↗
22. ASTM D5766/D5766M-07 · 1986
23. 10.1007/978-94-009-4333-910.1007/978-94-009-4333-9 ↗
24. 10.1177/00219983880220110510.1177/002199838802201105 ↗
25. Williams ML · J. Appl. Mech · 1957 · 24 · 10910.1115/1.4011454 ↗
26. 10.1016/0013-7944(91)90054-510.1016/0013-7944(91)90054-5 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0069334710.1007/BF00693347 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.005 ↗
29. Tada H · 1973
30. 10.1023/B:FRAC.0000022241.23377.9110.1023/B:FRAC.0000022241.23377.91 ↗
31. Klesnil M · 1980
32. 10.1177/00219983710050040210.1177/002199837100500402 ↗
33. 10.1016/0036-9748(82)90411-210.1016/0036-9748(82)90411-2 ↗
34. 10.1007/BF0123314810.1007/BF01233148 ↗
35. 10.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50013-910.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50013-9 ↗
36. 10.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50015-210.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50015-2 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0018685410.1007/BF00186854 ↗
38. 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90138-J10.1016/0020-7683(92)90138-J ↗