Tensile Properties of Robotic 3D-Printed Parts with Varying Contour Layer Thickness
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is rapidly advancing across diverse fields. For instance, the use of robotic arms in various AM processes has led to significant gains in printing flexibility and manufacturing scalability. However, despite these advancements, there remains a notable research gap concerning the mechanical properties of parts 3D-printed with robotic arms. This study focuses on developing a robotic fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D-printing process with a layer resolution of 50 to 200μm . The impact of the robotic printing process on the mechanical properties of printed parts is investigated and benchmarked against a commercial FFF 3D printer. In addition, we propose a novel tool path that can vary contour layer thickness within an infill layer to improve mechanical strength by minimizing air gaps between contours. SEM images suggest this new tool path strategy leads to a meaningful reduction in void area fraction within contours, confirmed by a nearly 6% increase in ultimate tensile strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
2. 10.1108/1355254121123156310.1108/13552541211231563 ↗
3. 10.1186/s41205-021-00098-510.1186/s41205-021-00098-5 ↗
4. F42 Committee. ISO/ASTM52900 additive manufacturing—general principles - fundamentals and vocabulary. ASTM International: West Conshohocken PA; 2021. Available from: https://www.astm.org/f3177-21.html
5. 10.1142/1020010.1142/10200 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.00310.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00366-015-0407-010.1007/s00366-015-0407-0 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.404191310.1115/1.4041913 ↗
9. 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00980-310.1016/s0924-0136(01)00980-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/0010-4485(94)90032-910.1016/0010-4485(94)90032-9 ↗
11. 10.1108/1355254961015337010.1108/13552549610153370 ↗
12. 10.1108/1355254981022299310.1108/13552549810222993 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.446-447.26310.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.446-447.263 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.00110.1016/j.addma.2015.09.001 ↗
15. 10.1080/17452759.2019.156883510.1080/17452759.2019.1568835 ↗
16. Grutle ØK. 5-Axis 3D Printer. Master’s Thesis. University of Oslo; 2015.
17. 10.1109/access.2020.300777210.1109/access.2020.3007772 ↗
18. William JC Barnwell D. Strengthening ABS nylon and polyester 3D printed parts by stress tensor aligned deposition paths and five-axis printing. Solid Freeform Fab- rication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference; 2016.
19. Wu C Dai C Fang G et al. RoboFDM: A robotic system for support-free fab- rication using FDM. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- Tomation (ICRA). IEEE; 2017.10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989140 ↗
20. 10.1109/tase.2019.293821910.1109/tase.2019.2938219 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.00810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.rcim.2013.05.00110.1016/j.rcim.2013.05.001 ↗
23. Tiryaki ME Zhang X Pham Q-C. Printing-while-moving: A new paradigm for large-scale robotic 3D printing. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) IEEE; 2019.10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967524 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10648310.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106483 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.025 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.06510.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10765410.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107654 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.31010.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.13310.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.133 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.01.00310.1016/j.ijlmm.2022.01.003 ↗
32. 10.3390/polym1319336810.3390/polym13193368 ↗
33. Yaskawa Motoman GP7. n.d. Available from: https://www.motoman.com/en-us/products/robots/industrial/assembly-handling/gp-series/gp7 [Last accessed: August3 2023].
34. Original Prusa I3 MK3S+ 3D Printer. n.d. Available from: https://www.prusa3d.com/product/original-prusa-i3-mk3s-3d-printer-3/ [Last accessed: August3 2023].
35. Matterhackers M. Merlot red PRO series PLA filament—1.75mm (1kg). n.d. Available from: https://www.matterhackers.com/store/l/pro-series-pla/sk/MLUXZSRZ [Last accessed: November20 2022].
36. 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.00510.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.005 ↗
37. ASTM D638. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International: West Conshohocken PA; 2022; doi: 10.1520/d0638-2210.1520/d0638-22 ↗
38. Barnes J. Statistical Analysis for Engineers and Scientists. A Computer-Based Ap- proach. McGraw Hill: New York; 1994.
39. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.00610.1016/j.addma.2015.09.006 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma1108133310.3390/ma11081333 ↗
41. 10.3390/polym1320360510.3390/polym13203605 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.60010.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.600 ↗