Thermomechanical performance and multiscale modeling of hexagonal boron nitride modified out-of-autoclave manufactured silica fiber reinforced phenolic composites
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, high loadings of boron nitride (BN) nanoplatelets were added to silica fiber-reinforced phenolic composites to study the multifunctional impact of BN loading and manufacturing processing on the subsequent mechanical, thermal, and thermomechanical properties. A series of high-quality laminates were made with various loadings of BN using compression-molded out-of-autoclave processing. Three-point bend and short beam shear testing determined the relationship between BN loading and mechanical performance. The fracture properties were analyzed using optical and scanning electron microscopy. The thermal conductivity performance was increased up to a 93% improvement, indicating the thermal management multifunctionality of the modified composites without changing the crosslinking ability or glass transition temperature significantly. The modified performance of hybrid silica/phenolic/BN composites is demonstrated through micromechanical multiscale modeling, where BN loading and particle stress concentrations impact the modulus and strength of the composite.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sandia National Laboratories, Advanced Materials Lab, 87108 Albuquerque, NM, USA
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, FAMU – FSU College of Engineering, 2525 Pottsdamer Street, 32310 Tallahassee, FL, USA
High-Performance Materials Institute, 2005 Levy Avenue, 32310 Tallahassee, FL, USA
Funding
Sandia National Laboratories · U.S. Department of Energy · National Nuclear Security Administration
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002199831245490710.1177/0021998312454907 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.03.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.03.006 ↗
3. 10.2514/1.A3462210.2514/1.A34622 ↗
4. 10.1016/0010-4361(87)90410-110.1016/0010-4361(87)90410-1 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.75016010510.1002/pc.750160105 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00019-010.1016/S1359-835X(98)00019-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.05810.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.058 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13084010.1016/j.matlet.2021.130840 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.02710.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.027 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41598-018-25965-w10.1038/s41598-018-25965-w ↗
11. 10.1021/nl404058r10.1021/nl404058r ↗
12. 10.1088/0022-3727/36/5/32310.1088/0022-3727/36/5/323 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.476751710.1063/1.4767517 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.03010.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.030 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.3491510.1002/app.34915 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10685510.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106855 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41699-021-00231-210.1038/s41699-021-00231-2 ↗
19. 10.1039/C6RA27062J10.1039/C6RA27062J ↗
20. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-64310.1186/1556-276X-9-643 ↗
21. 10.1351/PAC-CON-09-11-4110.1351/PAC-CON-09-11-41 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apt.2019.08.00410.1016/j.apt.2019.08.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.006 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0381810.1021/acs.iecr.0c03818 ↗
25. 10.1177/095400832092939610.1177/0954008320929396 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.02710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.027 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14446310.1016/j.cej.2023.144463 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.04.00410.1016/j.wear.2006.04.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.10110.1016/j.msea.2006.03.101 ↗
30. Pan B, Tan J, Jia H, et al. Tribological behavior of phenolic nanocomposites reinforced by 2D atomic crystal of boron nitride. J Polym Mater. 2016;33:567–577.
31. 10.3390/jcs707029110.3390/jcs7070291 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00076-310.1016/S0141-3910(01)00076-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.02.03710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.02.037 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.04310.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.043 ↗
35. 10.1039/C4NR01816H10.1039/C4NR01816H ↗
36. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0515710.1021/acsnano.9b05157 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.27910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.279 ↗
38. Cullity B. Elements of X-Ray diffraction. 3rd ed. Essex: Pearson; 2001.
39. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.01710.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.017 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.035 ↗
41. 10.1021/jp101857w10.1021/jp101857w ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.018 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.6b1319710.1021/acsami.6b13197 ↗
44. 10.1155/2013/27503710.1155/2013/275037 ↗
45. 10.1007/s42452-020-2663-x10.1007/s42452-020-2663-x ↗
46. 10.1016/S1359-0294(03)00008-610.1016/S1359-0294(03)00008-6 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.00610.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.006 ↗
48. 10.3390/app914283210.3390/app9142832 ↗
49. 10.1021/jp106330c10.1021/jp106330c ↗
50. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.06910.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.069 ↗
51. 10.1177/0021998321103163310.1177/00219983211031633 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12451510.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124515 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.11016710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110167 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.09.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.09.007 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12183810.1016/j.polymer.2019.121838 ↗
56. Chen J Gao X Song W. Effect of various carbon nanofillers and different filler aspect ratios on the thermal conductivity of epoxy matrix nanocomposites. Results Phys. 2019;15.10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102771 ↗
57. 10.1038/srep2682510.1038/srep26825 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.016 ↗
59. 10.3390/ma1316363410.3390/ma13163634 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.11.00910.1016/j.vacuum.2014.11.009 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.06810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.068 ↗
62. 10.14513/actatechjaur.0070610.14513/actatechjaur.00706 ↗
63. 10.1039/C9NJ05834F10.1039/C9NJ05834F ↗
64. 10.3390/polym1003027710.3390/polym10030277 ↗
65. 10.1002/polb.2092510.1002/polb.20925 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.001 ↗