journal article·2011-03

Development of air vehicle with active flapping and twisting of wing

Sangyol Yoon, Lae-Hyong Kang, Sungho Jo

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 8· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper addresses mechanisms for active flapping and twisting of robotic wings and assesses flying effectiveness as a function of twist angle. Unlike the flapping motion of bird wings, insects generally make a twisting motion at the root of their wings while flapping, which makes it possible for them to hover in midair. This work includes the development of a Voice Coil Motor (VCM) because a flapping-wing air vehicle should be assembled with a compact actuator to decrease size and weight. A linkage mechanism is proposed to transform the linear motion of the VCM into the flapping and twisting motions of wings. The assembled flapping-wing air vehicle, whose weight is 2.86 g, produces an average positive vertical force proportional to the twist angle. The force saturates because the twist angle is mechanically limited. This work demonstrates the possibility of developing a flapping-wing air vehicle that can hover in midair using a mechanism that actively twists the roots of wings during flapping.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems · Wind Energy Research and Development

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Nguyen Q V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D Y. Characteristics of a beetles free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 77–86.10.1016/S1672-6529(09)60195-5 ↗
2. Fujikawa T, Sato Y, Makata Y, Yamashita T, Kikuchi K. Motion analysis of butterfly-style flapping robot for different wing and body design. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2008), Bangkok, 2009, 216–221.10.1109/ROBIO.2009.4913006 ↗
3. Wood R J. The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24, 341–347.10.1109/TRO.2008.916997 ↗
4. Sitti M. Piezoelectrically actuated four-bar mechanism with two flexible links for micromechanical flying insect thorax. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2003, 8, 26–36.10.1109/TMECH.2003.809126 ↗
5. Żbikowski R, Galiński C, Pedersen C B. Four-bar linkage mechanism for insectlike flapping wings in hover. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2005, 127, 817–824.10.1115/1.1829091 ↗
6. McIntosh S H, Agrawal S K, Khan Z. Design of a mechanism for biaxial rotation of a wing for a hovering vehicle. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2006, 11, 145–153.10.1109/TMECH.2006.871089 ↗
7. Norberg R Å. The pterostigma of insect wings an inertial regulator of wing pitch. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1972, 81, 9–22.10.1007/BF00693547 ↗
8. Dudley R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function and Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, 2000.10.1515/9780691186344 ↗
9. Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 1984, 305, 17–40.10.1098/rstb.1984.0050 ↗
10. Azuma A. The Biokinetics of Flying and Swimming, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., El Segundo, USA, 2006.10.2514/4.862502 ↗
11. Betts C. The comparative morphology of the wings and axillae of selected heteroptera. Journal of Zoology, 1986, 1, 255–282.10.1111/j.1096-3642.1986.tb00639.x ↗
12. Ennos A. The effect of size on the optimal shapes of gliding insects and seeds. Journal of Zoology, 1989, 219, 61–69.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02565.x ↗
13. Dudley R. Biomechanics of flight in neotropical butterflies: Morphometrics and kinematics. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1990, 150, 37–53.10.1242/jeb.150.1.37 ↗
14. Hibbeler R. Mechanics of Materials, 2nd edition, Macmillan College Publishing Company, New York, USA, 1994.
15. Jongerius S, Lentink D. Structural analysis of a dragonfly wing. Experimental Mechanics, 2010, 50, 1323–1334.10.1007/s11340-010-9411-x ↗
16. Wootton R J, Herbert R C, Young P G, Evans K E. Approaches to the structural modelling of insect wings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 2003, 358, 1577–1587.10.1098/rstb.2003.1351 ↗