A Three-row Opposed Gripping Mechanism with Bioinspired Spiny Toes for Wall-climbing Robots
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a study of a three-row opposed gripping mechanism made of bioinspired spiny toes. An insect Serica orientalis Motschulsky’s tarsal system was first described and studied. A compliant single spiny toe model was established assuming that the contact asperities were spheres. Following the single toe contact model, a spiny toe array’s contact model was then developed using asperity height’s distribution function. By studying the engaging and disengaging process of the single toe, the mechanical behavior of the toe and toe array were addressed. The toes as well as the arrays were manufactured via rapid prototyping. A customized apparatus using displacement-control method has been carried out to measure the pull-in forces and pull-off positions of the single toe and toe array under various compression conditions. Based on the understanding, a three-row opposed gripping mechanism with radial configuration for wall-climbing robots was designed and fabricated according to the mechanical behaviors of the toe and array. Using an opposed spoke configuration with 3 rows of 31 toes on each linkage array, the mechanism designed as a foot of climbing robots can vertically resist at least 1 kg of load on rough inverted surface, while the maximum normal load is as high as 31 N. The findings may provide a way in developing a high payload wall-climbing robot system for practical applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Soft Robotics and Applications · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Balaguer C, Gimenez A, Abderrahim C. Roma robots for inspection of steel based infrastructures. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2002, 29, 246–251.10.1108/01439910210425540 ↗
2. Eich M, Vögele T. Design and control of a lightweight magnetic climbing robot for vessel inspection. 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED), Corfu, Greece, 2011, 1200–1205.
3. Xu Z L, Ma P S. A wall-climbing robot for labelling scale of oil tank’s volume. Robotica, 2002, 20, 209–212.10.1017/S0263574701003964 ↗
4. Iborra A, Pastor J A, Alonso D, Alvarez B, Ortiz F J, Navarro P J, Fernández C, Suardiaz J. A cost-effective robotic solution for the cleaning of ships’ hulls. Robotica, 2010, 28, 453–464.10.1017/S0263574709005797 ↗
5. Resino J C, Jardón A, Giménez A, Balaguer C. Analysis of the direct and inverse kinematics of ROMA II robot. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, 869–874.
6. Prahlad H, Pelrine R, Stanford S, Marlow J, Kornbluh R. Electroadhesive robots—wall climbing robots enabled by a novel, robust, and electrically controllable adhesion technology. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, USA, 2008, 3028–3033.
7. Modern Architecture Affords Innovative Cleaning Solutions, [2018-08-05], http://www.serbot.ch/en/facade-cleaning
8. Zaaf A, Van D R, Herrel A, Aerts P. Spatio-temporal gait characteristics of level and vertical locomotion in a ground-dwelling and a climbing gecko. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 1233–1246.10.1242/jeb.204.7.1233 ↗
9. Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Full R J. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair, Nature, 2000, 405, 681–685.10.1038/35015073 ↗
10. Liang Y A, Autumn K, Hsieh S T, Zesch W, Chan W P, Fearing R, FullR J, Kenny T W. Adhesion force measurements on single gecko setae. Technical Digest of the 2000 Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, South Carolina, USA, 2000, 33–38.
11. Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, Peattie A M, Hansen W R, Sponberg S, Kenny T W, Fearing, R, Israelachvili J N, Full R J. Evidence for van der waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99, 12252–12256.10.1073/pnas.192252799 ↗
12. Liu Y W, Sun S M, Wu X, Mei T. A wheeled wall-climbing robot with bio-inspired spine mechanisms. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 17–28.10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60096-2 ↗
13. Persson B N J. Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2007, 19, 376110.
14. Federle W, Barnes W J, Baumgartner W, Drechsler P, Smith J M. Wet but not slippery: Boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2006, 3, 689–697.10.1098/rsif.2006.0135 ↗
15. Huang W, Wang X L. Biomimetic design of elastomer surface pattern for friction control under wet conditions. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2013, 8, 046001.10.1088/1748-3182/8/4/046001 ↗
16. Dai Z D, Gorb S N, Schwarz U. Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 2479–2488.10.1242/jeb.205.16.2479 ↗
17. Asbeck A T, Cutkosky M R. Designing compliant spine mechanisms for climbing. Journal of Mechanisms & Robotics, 2012, 4, 031007.10.1115/1.40066591 ↗
18. Liu G W, LY W, Wang X J, Wu X, Mei T. Design and experiment of a bioinspired wall-climbing robot using spiny grippers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, China, 2016, 665–670.
19. Kim S, Asbeck A T, Provancher W, Cutkosky M R. Spinybot II: Climbing hard walls with compliant microspines. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Seatle, USA, 2005, 601–606.
20. Autumn K, Buehler M, Cutkosky M, Fearing R, Full R J, Goldman D, Groff R, Provancher W, Rizzi A A, Saranli U, Saunders A, Koditschek D E. Robotics in scansorial environments. Proceedings of the SPIE 5804: Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, 2005, 5804, 291–302.10.1117/12.606157 ↗
21. Spenko M J, Haynes G C, Sanders J A, Cutkosky M R, Koditschek D E. Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot. Journal of Field Robotics, 2008, 25, 223–242.10.1002/rob.20238 ↗
22. Haynes G C, Khripin A, Lynch G, Amory J, Saunders A, Rizzi A A, Koditschek D E. Rapid pole climbing with a quadrupedal robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan, 2009, 2767–2772.
23. Wu X, Liu G W, Wang X J, Liu Y W, Mei T. Study of a bioinspired wall-climbing robot: Contact mechanism and performance. Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Smart Materials, Snowbird, USA, 2017, V001T006A002.
24. Parness A, Frost M, Thatte N, King J P, Witkoe K, Nevarez M, Garrett M, Aghazarian H, Kennedy B. Gravity independent rock-climbing robot and a sample acquisition tool with microspine grippers. Journal of Field Robotics, 2013, 30, 897–915.10.1002/rob.21476 ↗
25. Parness A. Anchoring foot mechanisms for sampling and mobility in microgravity. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Shanghai, China, 2011, 6596–6599.