Inspired by Tree Frog: Bionic Design of Tread Pattern and Its Wet Friction Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Saha, S., Schramm, P., Nolan, A., & Hess, J. (2016). Adverse weather conditions and fatal motor vehicle crashes in the United States, 1994–2012. Environmental Health, 15, 1–9.10.1186/s12940-016-0189-x ↗
2. Kang, Y. S., Nazari, A., Chen, L., Taheri, S., Ferris, J. B., Flintsch, G., & Battaglia, F. (2019). A probabilistic approach to hydroplaning potential and risk. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 12, 63–70.10.4271/06-12-01-0005 ↗
3. Dehnad, M. H., & Khodaii, A. (2019). Effects of asphalt pavement texture on hydroplaning threshold speed. Journal of Central South University, 26, 256–264.10.1007/s11771-019-3998-6 ↗
4. Persson, B. N. J., Tartaglino, U., Albohr, O., & Tosatti, E. (2005). Rubber friction on wet and dry road surfaces: The sealing effect. Physical Review B, 71, 035428.10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035428 ↗
5. Jiao, Y. L., Liu, X. J., & Liu, K. (2018). Experimental study on wet skid resistance at different water-film thicknesses. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 70, 1737–1744.10.1108/ILT-11-2017-0362 ↗
6. Skouvaklis, G., Blackford, J. R., & Koutsos, V. (2012). Friction of rubber on ice: A new machine, influence of rubber properties and sliding parameters. Tribology International, 49, 44–52.10.1016/j.triboint.2011.12.015 ↗
7. Tuononen, A. J., Kriston, A., & Persson, B. N. J. (2016). Multiscale physics of rubber-ice friction. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 145, 114703.10.1063/1.4962576 ↗
8. Zhuang, J. D. (1996). Automotive Tire Science. Beijing Institute of Technology Press. in Chinese.
9. Fwa, T. F., Anupam, K., & Ong, G. P. (2010). Relative effectiveness of grooves in tire and pavement for reducing vehicle hydroplaning risk. Transportation Research Record, 2155, 73–81.10.3141/2155-08 ↗
10. Chiu, J. T., & Shui, C. R. (2018). Analysis of the wet grip characteristics of tire tread patterns. Tire Science and Technology, 46, 2–15.10.2346/tire.18.460103 ↗
11. Ripka, S., Lind, H., Wangenheim, M., Wallaschek, J., Wiese, K., & Wies, B. (2012). Investigation of friction mechanisms of siped tire tread blocks on snowy and icy surfaces. Tire Science and Technology, 40, 1–24.10.2346/1.3684409 ↗
12. Barnes, W. J. P., Smith, J., Oines, C., & Mundl, R. (2002). Bionics and wet grip. Tire Technology International, 2002, 56–60.
13. Chen, H. W., Zhang, L. W., Zhang, D. Y., Zhang, P. F., & Han, Z. W. (2015). Bioinspired surface for surgical graspers based on the strong wet friction of tree frog toe pads. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 7, 13987–13995.10.1021/acsami.5b03039 ↗
14. Persson, B. N. J. (2007). Biological adhesion for locomotion: Basic principles. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 21, 1145–1173.10.1163/156856107782328335 ↗
15. Federle, W., Barnes, W. J. P., Baumgartner, W., Drechsler, P., & Smith, J. M. (2006). Wet but not slippery: Boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3, 689–697.10.1098/rsif.2006.0135 ↗
16. Dhong, C., & Fréchette, J. (2015). Coupled effects of applied load and surface structure on the viscous forces during peeling. Soft Matter, 11, 1901–1910.10.1039/C4SM02616K ↗
17. Gupta, R., & Frechette, J. (2012). Measurement and scaling of hydrodynamic interactions in the presence of draining channels. Langmuir, 28, 14703–14712.10.1021/la303508x ↗
18. Barnes, W. J. P., Baum, M., Peisker, H., & Gorb, S. N. (2013). Comparative cryo-SEM and AFM studies of hylid and rhacophorid tree frog toe pads. Journal of Morphology, 274, 1384–1396.10.1002/jmor.20186 ↗
19. Barnes, W. J. P., Goodwyn, P. J. P., Nokhbatolfoghahai, M., & Gorb, S. N. (2011). Elastic modulus of tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 197, 969–978.10.1007/s00359-011-0658-1 ↗
20. Kappl, M., Kaveh, F., & Barnes, W. J. P. (2016). Nanoscale friction and adhesion of tree frog toe pads. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 11, 035003.10.1088/1748-3190/11/3/035003 ↗
21. Scholz, I., Barnes, W. J. P., Smith, J. M., & Baumgartner, W. (2009). Ultrastructure and physical properties of an adhesive surface, the toe pad epithelium of the tree frog, Litoria caerulea White. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212, 155–162.10.1242/jeb.019232 ↗
22. Barnes, W. J. P. (2007). Functional morphology and design constraints of smooth adhesive pads. MRS Bulletin, 32, 479–485.10.1557/mrs2007.81 ↗
23. Barnes, W. J. P. (1999). Tree frogs and tire technology. Tire Technology International, 1999, 42–47.
24. Iturri, J., Xue, L. J., Kappl, M., Garcia, F. L., Barnes, W. J. P., Butt, H. J., & del Campo, A. (2015). Torrent frog-inspired adhesives: Attachment to flooded surfaces. Advanced Functional Materials, 25, 1499–1505.10.1002/adfm.201403751 ↗
25. Xue, L. J., Sanz, B., Luo, A. Y., Turner, K. T., Wang, X., Tan, D., Zhang, R., Du, H., Steinhart, M., Mijangos, C., Guttmann, M., Kappl, M., & del Campo, A. (2017). Hybrid surface patterns mimicking the design of the adhesive toe pad of tree frog. ACS Nano, 11, 9711–9719.10.1021/acsnano.7b04994 ↗
26. Banik, A., & Tan, K. T. (2020). Dynamic friction performance of hierarchical biomimetic surface pattern inspired by frog toe-pad. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 7, 2000987.10.1002/admi.202000987 ↗
27. Chen, D. H., Zhang, Y. C., Long, G., Liu, W., Li, X. H., Sun, Y. H., & Chang, Z. Y. (2018). An optimal wet friction plate inspired by biological surface patterns. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 15, 872–882.10.1007/s42235-018-0074-0 ↗
28. Moore, D. F. (1972). The friction and lubrication of elastomers. Pergamon.
29. Persson, B. N. J. (2001). Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115, 3840–3861.10.1063/1.1388626 ↗
30. Persson, B. N. J., & Volokitin, A. I. (2006). Rubber friction on smooth surfaces. The European Physical Journal E, 21, 69–80.10.1140/epje/i2006-10045-9 ↗
31. Maegawa, S., Itoigawa, F., & Nakamura, T. (2016). A role of friction-induced torque in sliding friction of rubber materials. Tribology International, 93, 182–189.10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.030 ↗
32. Maegawa, S., Itoigawa, F., & Nakamura, T. (2016). Effect of surface grooves on kinetic friction of a rubber slider. Tribology International, 102, 326–332.10.1016/j.triboint.2016.05.019 ↗
33. Hale, J., Lewis, R., & Carré, M. J. (2020). Rubber friction and the effect of shape. Tribology International, 141, 105911.10.1016/j.triboint.2019.105911 ↗
34. Wu, J., Wang, Y. S., Su, B. L., Dong, J. Y., Cui, Z. B., & Gond, B. K. (2017). Prediction of tread pattern block deformation in contact with road. Polymer Testing, 58, 208–218.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.12.030 ↗
35. Yang, C., & Persson, B. N. J. (2008). Contact mechanics: contact area and interfacial separation from small contact to full contact. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 20, 215214.
36. Murarash, B., Itovich, Y., & Varenberg, M. (2011). Tuning elastomer friction by hexagonal surface patterning. Soft Matter, 7, 5553–5557.10.1039/c1sm00015b ↗
37. Kawasaki, S., Tada, T., & Persson, B. N. J. (2018). Adhesion and friction between glass and rubber in the dry state and in water: Role of contact hydrophobicity. Soft Matter, 14, 5428–5441.10.1039/C8SM00847G ↗
38. Langowski, J. K. A., Dodou, D., Kamperman, M., & van Leeuwen, J. L. (2018). Tree frog attachment: Mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives. Frontiers in Zoology, 15, 1–21.10.1186/s12983-018-0273-x ↗
39. Farzaneh, H. H., & Lindemann, U. (2019). A practical guide to bio-inspired design. Springer Vieweg.10.1007/978-3-662-57684-7 ↗