journal article·2026-01

An Improved Machine Learning Model for Screening and Activity Prediction of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase

Huanghui Xia, Huangzhi Xia, Jianzhong Huang

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 23· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics · Melanoma and MAPK Pathways

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Cohen, S. (1962). Isolation of a mouse submaxillary gland protein accelerating incisor eruption and eyelid opening in the new-born animal. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 237(5), 1555–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)83739-010.1016/S0021-9258(19)83739-0 ↗
2. Lemmon, M. A., & Schlessinger, J. (2010). Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell, 141(7), 1117–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.01110.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011 ↗
3. Sudhesh Dev, S., Zainal Abidin, S. A., Farghadani, R., Othman, I., & Naidu, R. (2021). Receptor tyrosine kinases and their signaling pathways as therapeutic targets of curcumin in cancer. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, Article 772510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.77251010.3389/fphar.2021.772510 ↗
4. Grassot, J., Gouy, M., Perrière, G., & Mouchiroud, G. (2006). Origin and molecular evolution of receptor tyrosine kinases with immunoglobulin-like domains. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23(6), 1232–1241. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msk00710.1093/molbev/msk007 ↗
5. Grünewald, F. S., Prota, A. E., Giese, A., & Ballmer-Hofer, K. (2010). Structure-function analysis of VEGF receptor activation and the role of coreceptors in angiogenic signaling. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1804(3), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.09.00210.1016/j.bbapap.2009.09.002 ↗
6. Diwanji, D., Thaker, T., & Jura, N. (2019). More than the sum of the parts: Toward full-length receptor tyrosine kinase structures. IUBMB Life, 71(6), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.206010.1002/iub.2060 ↗
7. Phillips-Mason, P. J., Craig, S. E., & Brady-Kalnay, S. M. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Shedding of RPTPs in cancer cells switches signals from stabilizing cell-cell adhesion to driving cell migration. Cell Adhesion & Migration, 5(4), 298–305. https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.5.4.1697010.4161/cam.5.4.16970 ↗
8. Orrico, K. B. (2023). Basic concepts of cancer genetics and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition for pharmacists A narrative review. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners., 29(5), 1187–1195.10.1177/10781552231153814 ↗
9. Casaletto, J. B., & McClatchey, A. I. (2012). Spatial regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases in development and cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 12(6), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc327710.1038/nrc3277 ↗
10. Balbuena-Rebolledo, I., Padilla-Martínez, I. I., Rosales-Hernández, M. C., & Bello, M. (2021). Repurposing FDA drug compounds against breast cancer by targeting EGFR/HER2. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 14(8), 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph1408079110.3390/ph14080791 ↗
11. Kang, J. X., Li, C., Cheng, Y. M., Huang, M. X., Zhao, G. K., Jin, Z. L., Qi, X. W., Gu, J., & Ouyang, Q. (2024). Advances in small-molecule dual inhibitors targeting EGFR and HER2 receptors as anti-cancer agents. Current Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/010929867330889624052817331710.2174/0109298673308896240528173317 ↗
12. Delgado-Ramirez, Y., Colly, V., Gonzalez, G. V., & Leon-Cabrera, S. (2020). Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 as a target in colon cancer therapy. Oncology Letters, 20(1), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.1161410.3892/ol.2020.11614 ↗
13. Kim, D. G., Jin, Y., Jin, J., Yang, H., Joo, K. M., Lee, W. S., Shim, S. R., Kim, S. W., Yoo, J., Lee, S. H., Yoo, J. S., & Nam, D. H. (2015). Anticancer activity of TTAC-0001, a fully human anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2/KDR) monoclonal antibody, is associated with inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. MAbs, 7(6), 1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.108685410.1080/19420862.2015.1086854 ↗
14. Mahendra, I., Winata, I., Setiawan, W., Putra, I., & Darmayasa, P. (2024). Prognostic significance of tumor angiogenesis markers in advanced cervical cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Sains Medika: Journal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan, 15(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.30659/sainsmed.v15i2.2894310.30659/sainsmed.v15i2.28943 ↗
15. Tomuleasa, C., Tigu, A. B., Munteanu, R., Moldovan, C. S., Kegyes, D., Onaciu, A., Gulei, D., Ghiaur, G., Einsele, H., & Croce, C. M. (2024). Therapeutic advances of targeting receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 9(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01899-w10.1038/s41392-024-01899-w ↗
16. Lin, C. C., Suen, K. M., Lidster, J., & Ladbury, J. E. (2024). The emerging role of receptor tyrosine kinase phase separation in cancer. Trends in Cell Biology, 34(5), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2023.09.00210.1016/j.tcb.2023.09.002 ↗
17. Segovia-Mendoza, M., González-González, M. E., Barrera, D., Díaz, L., & García-Becerra, R. (2015). Efficacy and mechanism of action of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib, lapatinib and neratinib in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: preclinical and clinical evidence. American Journal of Cancer Research, 5(9), 2531–2561.
18. Wang, J., Gao, L., Lee, Y. M., Kalesh, K. A., Ong, Y. S., Lim, J., Jee, J. E., Sun, H., Lee, S. S., Hua, Z. C., & Lin, Q. (2016). Target identification of natural and traditional medicines with quantitative chemical proteomics approaches. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 162, 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.01.01010.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.01.010 ↗
19. Lamichhane, S., Rai, R. P., Khatri, A., Adhikari, R., Shrestha, B. G., & Shrestha, S. K. (2023). Screening of phytochemicals as potential anti-breast cancer agents targeting HER2: an in-silico approach. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 41(3), 897–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.201497210.1080/07391102.2021.2014972 ↗
20. Alreemi, R. M. (2024). Decoding the anti-cancer potential of Pexidartinib (PLX3397), a Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor, using next-generation knowledge discovery methods. Bioinformation, 20(5), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630020046010.6026/973206300200460 ↗
21. Sanches, V. H. D. S., Lobato, C. C., Silva, L. B., Dos Santos, I. V. F., Barros, E. S., Maciel, A. A., Ferreira, E. F. B., da Costa, K. S., Espejo-Román, J. M., Rosa, J. M. C., Kimani, N. M., & Santos, C. B. R. (2024). Rational approach to new chemical entities with antiproliferative activity on Ab1 tyrosine kinase encoded by the BCR-ABL gene: an hierarchical biochemoinformatics analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 17(11), 1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph1711149110.3390/ph17111491 ↗
22. Qiao, G., Wang, G., & Li, Y. (2024). Causal enhanced drug-target interaction prediction based on graph generation and multi-source information fusion. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 40(10), btae570. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae57010.1093/bioinformatics/btae570 ↗
23. Alshehri, M. M., Kumar, N., Kuthi, N. A., Olaide, Z., Alshammari, M. K., Bello, R. O., Alghazwni, M. K., Alshehri, A. M., Alshlali, O. M., Ashimiyu-Abdusalam, Z., & Umar, H. I. (2024). Computer-aided drug discovery of c-Abl kinase inhibitors from plant compounds against chronic myeloid leukemia. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2024.232929710.1080/07391102.2024.2329297 ↗
24. Li, J., Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Zhang, Q., Shao, J., Wang, C., Qiu, Z., & Li, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence-assisted decision making for prognosis and drug efficacy prediction in lung cancer patients a narrative review. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 13(12), 7021–7033.10.21037/jtd-21-864 ↗
25. Rana, M. M., & Nguyen, D. D. (2023). Geometric graph learning with extended atom-types features for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 164 Article 107250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.10725010.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107250 ↗
26. Kim, H., Shim, H., Ranganath, A., He, S., Stevenson, G., & Allen, J. E. (2025). Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using multi-instance learning with docking structures. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, 1518875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.151887510.3389/fphar.2024.1518875 ↗
27. Zhou, H., Ren, D., Xia, H., Fan, M., Yang, X., & Huang, H. (2021). AST-GNN: An attention-based spatio-temporal graph neural network for interaction-aware pedestrian trajectory prediction. Neurocomputing, 445, 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.02410.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.024 ↗
28. Fan, M., Zhang, X., Hu, J., Gu, G., & Tao, D. (2022). Adaptive data structure regularized multiclass discriminative feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(10), 5859–5872. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.307160310.1109/TNNLS.2021.3071603 ↗
29. Hao, X., Wang, R., Guo, Y., Xiao, Y., Yu, M., Wang, M., Chen, W., & Zhang, D. (2023). Multimodal self-paced locality-preserving learning for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 15(2), 832–843. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2022.318970110.1109/TCDS.2022.3189701 ↗
30. Yang, N., Tang, Z., Cai, X. L., & Chen Qian, Hu. (2022). Cooperative multi-population Harris Hawks optimization for many-objective optimization. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8, 3299–3332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00670-410.1007/s40747-022-00670-4 ↗
31. Parizi, M. K., Keynia, F., & Khatibi Bardsiri, A. (2020). Woodpecker Mating Algorithm (WMA) a nature-inspired algorithm for solving optimization problems. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 11(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2020.424510.22075/ijnaa.2020.4245 ↗
32. Parizi, M. K., Keynia, F., & Khatibi Bardsiri, A. (2020). OWMA: An improved self-regulatory woodpecker mating algorithm using opposition-based learning and allocation of local memory for solving optimization problems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-20107510.3233/JIFS-201075 ↗
33. Parizi, M. K., Keynia, F., & Khatibi Bardsiri, A. (2021). HSCWMA: A new hybrid SCA-WMA algorithm for solving optimization problems. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962202150017610.1142/S0219622021500176 ↗
34. Zhang, J., Li, H., & Parizi, M. K. (2022). HWMWOA: A hybrid WMA-WOA algorithm with adaptive cauchy mutation for global optimization and data classification. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 22, 1195–1252. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021962202250067510.1142/s0219622022500675 ↗
35. Gong, J., & Parizi, M. K. (2022). GWMA: The parallel implementation of woodpecker mating algorithm on the GPU. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 45, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2022.207841810.1080/02533839.2022.2078418 ↗
36. Zhong, M., Wen, J., Ma, J., Cui, H., Zhang, Q., & Parizi, M. K. (2023). A hierarchical multi-leadership sine cosine algorithm to dissolving global optimization and data classification: The COVID-19 case study. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 164: 107212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.10721210.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107212 ↗
37. Lu, C., Wei, Y., & Parizi, M. K. (2025). Improved sine cosine algorithm for global optimization and medical data classification. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962202550085310.1142/S0219622025500853 ↗
38. Xue, J. K., & Shen, B. (2022). Dung beetle optimizer: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for global optimization. The Journal of Supercomputing, 79(10), 7305–7336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04959-610.1007/s11227-022-04959-6 ↗
39. Tang, W., Qin, H., & Kang, S. (2025). Dung beetle optimizer based on mean fitness distance balance and multi-strategy fusion for solving practical engineering problems. Scientific Reports, 15, 26389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02937-510.1038/s41598-025-02937-5 ↗
40. Wei, R., Lan, J., Li, K., Luo, Y., & Hu, Y. (2025). MFDB: Multimodal feature fusion and dynamic behavior modeling for interactive recommendation systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 326, Article 114047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.11404710.1016/j.knosys.2025.114047 ↗
41. Kanazawa, K., Sano, T. G., Cairoli, A., & Baule, A. (2020). Loopy Lévy flights enhance tracer diffusion in active suspensions. Nature, 579, 364–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2086-210.1038/s41586-020-2086-2 ↗
42. Jiang, L., Pheh, Y. H., Hla Win, S. K., Tang, Y., Yang, Y., & Foong, S. (2025). Mass distribution affects the circle or hypotrochoid trajectory of the maple seed. Physics of Fluids, 37(4), Article 044121. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.026423910.1063/5.0264239 ↗
43. Amador-Larrea, S., Quiroz-Castellanos, M., & Ramos-Figueroa, O. (2025). An experimental study of strategies to control diversity in grouping mutation operators: An improvement to the adaptive mutation operator for the GGA-CGT for the bin packing problem. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 30(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca3002003110.3390/mca30020031 ↗
44. Herrera, F., Lozano, M., & Sá nchez, A. M. (2005). Hybrid crossover operators for real-coded genetic algorithms: An experimental study. Soft Computing, 9, 280–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-004-0380-910.1007/s00500-004-0380-9 ↗
45. Ebbs-Picken, T., Da Silva, C., & Amon, C. (2023). Design optimization methodologies applied to battery thermal management systems: A review. Journal of Energy Storage, 67(8), Article 107460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.10746010.1016/j.est.2023.107460 ↗
46. Katche, M. L., Makokha, A. B., Zachary, S. O., & Adaramola, M. S. (2023). A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques used in solar PV systems. Energies, 16(5), 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1605220610.3390/en16052206 ↗
47. Pranupa, S., Sriram, A., & Nagaraja, S. R. (2023). A review of wind farm layout optimization techniques for optimal placement of wind turbines. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 13, 957–965. https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v13i2.13935.g876810.20508/ijrer.v13i2.13935.g8768 ↗
48. Tian, C. X., & Li, Y. X. (2025). Balanced dung beetle optimization algorithm based on parameter substitution and escape strategy. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 2348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86264-910.1038/s41598-025-86264-9 ↗
49. Wang, X., Wei, Y., Guo, Z., Wang, J., Yu, H., & Hu, B. (2024). A Sinh-cosh-enhanced DBO algorithm applied to global optimization problems. Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 9(5), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics905027110.3390/biomimetics9050271 ↗
50. Yu, M., Du, J., Xu, X., Xu, J., Jiang, F., Fu, S., & Zhang, J., & Liang, A. (2025). A multi-strategy enhanced Dung Beetle Optimization for real-world engineering problems and UAV path planning. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 118, 06–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.01.05510.1016/j.aej.2025.01.055 ↗
51. Xue, J. K., & Shen, B. (2023). Dung beetle optimizer: a new meta-heuristic algorithm for global optimization. The Journal of Supercomputing, 79, 7305–7336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-022-04959-610.1007/s11227-022-04959-6 ↗
52. Zhang, J., Li, H., & Parizi, M. (2022). HWMWOA: A hybrid WMA-WOA algorithm with adaptive Cauchy mutation for global optimization and data classification. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 22, 1195–1252. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021962202250067510.1142/s0219622022500675 ↗
53. Tang, J., Liu, G., & Pan, Q. (2021). A review on representative swarm intelligence algorithms for solving optimization problems: Applications and trends. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 8(10), 1627–1643. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2021.100412910.1109/JAS.2021.1004129 ↗
54. Zaman, H. R. R., & Gharehchopogh, F. S. (2022). An improved particle swarm optimization with backtracking search optimization algorithm for solving continuous optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 38(4), 2797–2831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01431-610.1007/s00366-021-01431-6 ↗
55. Zhang, R., Mao, S., Zhao, S., & Liu, C. (2024). An arithmetic optimization algorithm with balanced diversity and convergence for multimodal multi-objective optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 91, Article 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2024.10172410.1016/j.swevo.2024.101724 ↗
56. Wang, Z., Li, Y., Wu, L., & Guo, Q. (2024). A nonlinear adaptive weight-based mutated whale optimization algorithm and its application for solving engineering problems. IEEE Access, 12, 40225–40254. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.335033610.1109/ACCESS.2024.3350336 ↗
57. Arora, S., & Singh, S. (2019). Butterfly optimization algorithm: a novel approach for global optimization. Soft Computing, 23, 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3102-410.1007/s00500-018-3102-4 ↗
58. Shadravan, S., Naji, H. R., & Bardsiri, V. K. (2019). The Sailfish optimizer: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 80, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.01.00110.1016/j.engappai.2019.01.001 ↗
59. Khishe, M., & Mosavi, M. R. (2020). Chimp optimization algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 149, Article 113338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.11333810.1016/j.eswa.2020.113338 ↗
60. Abualigah, L., Diabat, A., Mirjalili, S., Elaziz, M. A., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021). The arithmetic optimization algorithm. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 376, Article 113609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11360910.1016/j.cma.2020.113609 ↗
61. Abdel-Basset, M., El-Shahat, D., Jameel, M., & Abouhawwash, M. (2023). Exponential distribution optimizer (EDO): A novel math-inspired algorithm for global optimization and engineering problems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 9329–9400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10403-910.1007/s10462-023-10403-9 ↗
62. Pan, J., Li, S., Zhou, P., Yang, G., & Lv, D. (2023). Dung beetle optimization algorithm guided by improved sine algorithm. Computer Engineering and Applications, 59(12), 92–110.
63. Xia, H., Chen, L., & Xu, H. (2025). Multi-strategy dung beetle optimizer for global optimization and feature selection. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 16, 189–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-024-02197-110.1007/s13042-024-02197-1 ↗
64. Derrac, J., Garcia, S., Molina, D., & Herrera, F. (2011). A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm & Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.00210.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.002 ↗
65. Chen, Q., Wang, Y., & Sun, Y. (2024). An improved dung beetle optimizer for UAV 3D path planning. The Journal of Supercomputing, 80, 26537–26567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06414-010.1007/s11227-024-06414-0 ↗
66. Zhao, Y., Xing, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Wan, M., Yi, D., Wu, C., Li, S., Xu, H., Zhang, H., Liu, Z., Zhou, G., Li, M., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Li, R., Wu, L., Zhao, D., Zan, P., He, S., & Bo, X. (2025). Evidential deep learning-based drug-target interaction prediction. Nature Communications, 16, 6915. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62235-610.1038/s41467-025-62235-6 ↗
67. Quan, N., Ma, S., Zhao, K., Bi, X., & Zhang, L. (2025). MFCADTI: Improving drug-target interaction prediction by integrating multiple feature through cross attention mechanism. BMC Bioinformatics, 26, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06075-710.1186/s12859-025-06075-7 ↗
68. Shi, H., Hu, J., Zhang, X., Jin, S., & Xu, X. (2025). Prediction of drug-target interactions based on substructure subsequences and cross-public attention mechanism. PLoS ONE, 20(5), Article e0324146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.032414610.1371/journal.pone.0324146 ↗
69. Talukder, M. A., Kazi, M., & Alazab, A. (2025). Predicting drug-target interactions using machine learning with improved data balancing and feature engineering. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 19495. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03932-610.1038/s41598-025-03932-6 ↗
70. Chen, L., Lu, S., Wang, J., Yang, N., Lv, D., Wu, L., Li, X., Sun, L., Yu, Y., Jin, B., Yang, L., Guo, Y., Xu, H., Yi, T., Zeng, X. Dong, J. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Niu, Y. Cheng, P. Pan, P. Deng, H. Pan, A., Min, X., Bai, J., Liu, L., Zhang, T., Li, J.,Ye, F., Liu, X., Shi, J. Liu, Q. Guo, W. Yang, J. Tang, S. Cang, O. Jiang, J. Fang, G. Yu, J., Wang, L., Zhuang, X., Wang, X., Yu, J., Yan, H., Luo, X., Guo, X., Ren, Y., Fan, S., Shi, M. M., & Su, W. (2025). Frontline treatment duration in MET-amplified NSCLC after third-generation Egfr-TKI failure: SACHI study insights. The 2025 World Conference of Lung Cancer. Retrieved October 7, 2025, from https://cattendee.abstractsonline.com/meeting/21151/Session/18610.1016/j.jtho.2025.09.926 ↗
71. Tian, Q., Bilgic, B., Fan, Q., Liao, C., Ngamsombat, C., Hu, Y., Witzel, T., Setsompop, K., Polimeni, J. R., & Huang, S. Y. (2020). DeepDTI: High-fidelity six-direction diffusion tensor imaging using deep learning. Neuroimage, 219, Article 117017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.11701710.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117017 ↗
72. Nguyen, T., Le, H., Quinn, T. P., Nguyen, T., Le, T. D., & Venkatesh, S. (2021). GraphDTA: Predicting drug-target binding affinity with graph neural networks. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 37(8), 1140–1147. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa92110.1093/bioinformatics/btaa921 ↗
73. Liu, T., Lin, Y., Wen, X., Jorissen, R. N., & Gilson, M. K. (2007). BindingDB: A web accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Research, 35((Database issue)), D198–D201. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl99910.1093/nar/gkl999 ↗
74. Wishart, D. S., Knox, C., Guo, A. C., Cheng, D., Shrivastava, S., Tzur, D., Gautam, B., & Hassanali, M. (2008). DrugBank: A knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res., 36((Database issue)), D901–D906. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm95810.1093/nar/gkm958 ↗
75. Tripathy, R. K., Frohock, Z., Wang, H., Cary, G. A., Keegan, S., Carter, G. W., & Li, Y. (2025). Effective integration of multi-omics with prior knowledge to identify biomarkers via explainable graph neural networks. NPJ Systems Biology and Applications, 11(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-025-00519-910.1038/s41540-025-00519-9 ↗
76. Wu, Y., Xu, Y., & Huang, X. (2025). Wind power prediction model based on integrated osprey and adaptive T-distribution dung beetle optimization algorithm. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 2678–2699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-025-00732-610.1007/s42235-025-00732-6 ↗
77. Xia, H., Ke, Y., Liao, R., & Zhang, H. (2025). Fractional order dung beetle optimizer with reduction factor for global optimization and industrial engineering optimization problems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, 308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11239-110.1007/s10462-025-11239-1 ↗
78. Xia, H., Sun, L., Xia, H., & Mirjalili, S. (2025). 3D path planning in complex mountainous environments for UAVs using quaternion-based dung beetle optimizer. Artificial Intelligence Review, 28, 935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-025-05316-x10.1007/s10586-025-05316-x ↗
79. Lim, B., Kim, D. Y., Seo, Y. J., Lee, J. Y., & Kim, J. M. (2025). Systems biology and integration of multi-omics data. In J. M. Kim & R. K. Pathak (Eds.), Bioinformatics in veterinary science (1st ed., pp. 163–183). Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-97-7395-4_8 ↗
80. Gomaa, H. (2011). Dynamic interaction modeling. Software modeling and design: UML, use cases, patterns, and software architectures (pp. 132–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9780511779183.011 ↗
81. Békés, M., Langley, D. R., & Crews, C. M. (2022). PROTAC targeted protein degraders: The past is prologue. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 21, 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00371-610.1038/s41573-021-00371-6 ↗
82. Doherty, C., Wilbanks, B., Khatua, S., & Maher, L. J. (2024). Aptamers in neuro-oncology: An emerging therapeutic modality. Neuro Oncology, 26(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad15610.1093/neuonc/noad156 ↗
83. El-Geneedy, M., El-Din Moustafa, H., Khater, H., Abd-Elsamee, S., & Gamel, S. A. (2025). A comprehensive explainable AI approach for enhancing transparency and interpretability in stroke prediction. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 26048. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11263-910.1038/s41598-025-11263-9 ↗
84. Kusne, A. G., Yu, H., Wu, C., Zhang, H., Hattrick-Simpers, J., DeCost, B., Sarker, S., Oses, C., Toher, C., Curtarolo, S., Davydov, A. V., Agarwal, R., Bendersky, L. A., Li, M., Mehta, A., & Takeuchi, I. (2020). On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning. Nature Communications, 11(1), 5966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19597-w10.1038/s41467-020-19597-w ↗