Liftoff of a New Hovering Oscillating-wing Micro Aerial Vehicle
Source abstract
Abstract
Hovering ability forms the basis for space operations of Micro Aerial Vehicles (MAVs). The problem of uneven load puts high demands on the wing design. In this paper, a new hovering-mode for MAVs, inspired by flapping flight in bees and hummingbirds but using high-aspect-ratio and low-stress wings, is proposed. Different from the flapping actuations that occur at the wing roots, the two wings are driven back and forth in a straight line. To simplify the design and control the angle of attack, passive wing rotation is employed. The numerical results and analysis show that the maximum stress of the oscillating wing is approximately 1/6 of that of the flapping wing when the lift of the oscillating wing is twice that of the flapping wing. A theoretical aerodynamic model of the kinematics of the vehicle’s driving mechanism was developed to fulfill its design. Force measurements indicate that the vehicle generates a sufficiently high cycle-averaged vertical thrust (71 g) for liftoff at a maximum frequency of 5.56 Hz, thereby validating the proposed aerodynamic model. Moreover, liftoff performance is presented to visually demonstrate the vertical take-off capabilities and hovering potential of the aeromechanical solution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems · Robotic Locomotion and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Lehmann F O, Pick S. The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2007, 210, 1362–1377.10.1242/jeb.02746 ↗
2. Sane S P. Steady or unsteady? Uncovering the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2011, 214, 349–351.10.1242/jeb.048330 ↗
3. Ellington C P. The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: Applications to micro-air vehicles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 202, 3439–3448.10.1242/jeb.202.23.3439 ↗
4. Shyy W, Aono H, Kang C K, Liu H. An Introduction to Flapping Wing Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139583916 ↗
5. Keennon M, Klingebiel K, Won H. Development of the nano hummingbird: A tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle. The 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Nashville, USA, 2012, 0588.10.2514/6.2012-588 ↗
6. Mackenzie D. A flapping of wings. Science, 2012, 335, 1430–1433.10.1126/science.335.6075.1430 ↗
7. Widhiarini S, Park J H, Yoon B S, Yoon K J, Paik II-H, Kim J H, Park C Y, Jun S M, Nam C. Bird-mimetic wing system of flapping-wing micro air vehicle with autonomous flight control capability. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 458–467.10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60319-0 ↗
8. Steltz E, Avadhanula S, Fearing R S. High lift force with 275 Hz wing beat in MFI. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Piscataway, USA, 2007, 3987–3992.10.1109/IROS.2007.4399068 ↗
9. Zdunich P, Bilyk D, Macmaster M, Loewen D, Delaurier J, Kornbluh R, Low T, Stanford S, Holeman D. Development and testing of the mentor flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44, 1701–1711.10.2514/1.28463 ↗
10. Ma K Y, Chirarattananon P, Wood R J. Design and fabrication of an insect-scale flying robot for control autonomy. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 2015, 1558–1564.10.1109/IROS.2015.7353575 ↗
11. Richter C, Lipson H. Untethered hovering flapping flight of a 3d-printed mechanical insect. Artificial Life, 2011, 17, 73–86.10.1162/artl_a_00020 ↗
12. Teoh Z E, Fuller S B, Chirarattananon P, Préz-Arancibia N O, Greenberg J D, Wood R J. A hovering flapping-wing microrobot with altitude control and passive upright stability. 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, 2012, 3209–3216.10.1109/IROS.2012.6386151 ↗
13. Breugel F V, Regan W, Lipson H. From insects to machines. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2008, 15, 68–74.10.1109/MRA.2008.929923 ↗
14. Ma K Y, Chirarattananon P, Fuller S B, Wood R J. Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science, 2013, 340, 603–607.10.1126/science.1231806 ↗
15. Wood R J. The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24, 341–347.10.1109/TRO.2008.916997 ↗
16. de Croon G C H E, de Clercq K M E, Ruijsink R, Remes B, de Wagter C. Design, aerodynamics, and vision-based control of the delfly. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2009, 1, 71–97.10.1260/175682909789498288 ↗
17. Nguyen Q-V, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D. Characteristics of a beetle’s free flight and a flapping-wing system that mimics beetle flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, 77–86.10.1016/S1672-6529(09)60195-5 ↗
18. Nakata T, Liu H, Tanaka Y, Nishihashi N, Wang X, Sato A. Aerodynamics of a bio-inspired flexible flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 045002.10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/045002 ↗
19. Wang J Z. Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering. Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85, 2216–2219.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2216 ↗
20. de Wagter C, Tijmons S, Remes B D W, de Croon G C H E. Autonomous flight of a 20-gram flapping wing MAV with a 4-gram onboard stereo vision system. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Hong Kong, China, 2014, 4982–4987.10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907589 ↗
21. Karásek M, Hua A, Nan Y H, Lalami M, Preumont A. Pitch and roll control mechanism for a hovering flapping wing mav. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2014, 6, 253–264.10.1260/1756-8293.6.4.253 ↗
22. Festo BionicOpter, [2015-10-02], https://www.festo.com/cms/en_corp/13165.htm.
23. Nguyen Q-V, Chan W L, Debiasi M. An insect-inspired flapping wing micro air vehicle with double wing clap-fling effects and capability of sustained hovering. Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, & Bioreplication, San Diego, USA, 2015, 94290U.10.1117/12.2085714 ↗
24. Nguyen Q-V, Chan W L, Debiasi M. Hybrid design and performance tests of a hovering insect-inspired flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 235–248.10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60297-4 ↗
25. Karásek M, Muijres F T, de Wagter C, Remes B D W, de Croon G C H E. A tailless aerial robotic flapper reveals that flies use torque coupling in rapid banked turns. Science, 2018, 361, 1089–1094.10.1126/science.aat0350 ↗
26. Chen Y, Zhao H, Mao J, Chirarattananon P, Helbling E F, Hyun N-S P, Clarke D R, Wood R J. Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles. Nature, 2019, 575, 324–329.10.1038/s41586-019-1737-7 ↗
27. Jafferis N T, Helbling E F, Karpelson M, Wood R J. Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle. Nature, 2019, 570, 491–495.10.1038/s41586-019-1322-0 ↗
28. Ma K Y, Chirarattananon P, Fuller S B, Wood R J. Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science, 2013, 340, 603.10.1126/science.1231806 ↗
29. Ristroph L, Childress S. Stable hovering of a jellyfish-like flying machine. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2014, 11, 20130992.10.1098/rsif.2013.0992 ↗
30. Fang F, Ho K L, Ristroph L, Shelley M J. A computational model of the flight dynamics and aerodynamics of a jellyfish-like flying machine. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 819, 621–655.10.1017/jfm.2017.150 ↗
31. Guo S, Li H, Zhou C, Zhang Y L, He Y, Wu J H. Analysis and experiment of a bio-inspired flyable micro flapping wing rotor. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2018, 79, 506–517.10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.009 ↗
32. Chang E, Matloff L Y, Stowers A K, Lentink D. Soft biohybrid morphing wings with feathers underactuated by wrist and finger motion. Science Robotics, 2020, 5, eaay 1246.10.1126/scirobotics.aay1246 ↗
33. Matloff L Y, Chang E, Feo T J, Jeffries L, Stowers A K, Thomson C, Lentink D. How flight feathers stick together to form a continuous morphing wing. Science, 2020, 367, 293–297.10.1126/science.aaz3358 ↗
34. Higashi Y, Emaru T, Tanaka K, Wang H O. Development of a cyclogyro-based flying robot with variable attack angle mechanisms. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems, Beijing, China, 2006, 3261–3266.10.1109/IROS.2006.282435 ↗
35. Hara N, Tanaka K, Ohtake H, Wang H O. Development of a flying robot with a pantograph-based variable wing mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2009, 25, 79–87.10.1109/TRO.2008.2008736 ↗
36. Feng L, Di P, Arai F. High-precision motion of magnetic microrobot with ultrasonic levitation for 3-d rotation of single oocyte. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016, 35, 1445–1458.10.1177/0278364916631414 ↗
37. Feng L, Liang S Z, Zhou X C, Yang J, Jiang Y G, Zhang D Y, Arar F. On-chip microfluid induced by oscillation of microrobot for noncontact cell transportation. Applied Physics Letters, 2017, 111, 203703.10.1063/1.5009545 ↗
38. de Croon G C H E, Groen M A, de Wagter C, Remes B, Ruijsink R, Van Oudheusden B W. Design, aerodynamics and autonomy of the delfly. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2012, 7, 025003.10.1088/1748-3182/7/2/025003 ↗
39. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F-O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 ↗