Biomimetic sensors: Active electrolocation of weakly electric fish as a model for active sensing in technical systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Instead of vision, many nocturnal animals use alternative senses for navigation and object detection in their dark environment. For this purpose, weakly electric mormyrid fish employ active electrolocation, during which they discharge a specialized electric organ in their tail which discharges electrical pulses. Each discharge builds up an electrical field around the fish, which is sensed by cutaneous electroreceptor organs that are distributed over most of the body surface of the fish. Nearby objects distort this electrical field and cause a local alteration in current flow in those electroreceptors that are closest to the object. By constantly monitoring responses of its electroreceptor organs, a fish can detect, localize, and identify environmental objects. Inspired by the remarkable capabilities of weakly electric fish in detecting and recognizing objects, we designed technical sensor systems that can solve similar problems of remote object sensing. We applied the principles of active electrolocation to technical systems by building devices that produce electrical current pulses in a conducting medium (water or ionized gases) and simultaneously sense local current density. Depending on the specific task a sensor was designed for devices could (i) detect an object, (ii) localize it in space, (iii) determine its distance, and (iv) measure properties such as material properties, thickness, or material faults. Our systems proved to be relatively insensitive to environmental disturbances such as heat, pressure, or turbidity. They have a wide range of applications including material identification, quality control, non-contact distance measurements, medical applications and many more. Despite their astonishing capacities, our sensors still lag far behind what electric fish are able to achieve during active electrolocation. The understanding of the neural principles governing electric fish sensory physiology and the corresponding optimization of our sensors to solve certain technical tasks therefore remain ongoing goals of our research.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fish biology, ecology, and behavior · Fish Biology and Ecology Studies · Fish Ecology and Management Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Moller P. Electric Fishes: History and Behavior, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.
2. von der Emde G. Electroreception. In: Evans D H (ed). The Physiology of Fishes, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1998, 313–343.
3. Bullock T H, Bodznick D A, Northcutt R G. The phylogenetic distribution of electroreception: Evidence for convergent evolution of a primitive vertebrate sense modality. Brain Research Reviews, 1983, 6, 25–46.10.1016/0165-0173(83)90003-6 ↗
4. Kalmijn A J. Detection of weak electric fields. In: Atema J, Fay R R, Popper A N, Tavolga W N (eds). Social Communication in Aquatic Environments, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1987, 151–186.
5. Heiligenberg W. Electrolocation of objects in the electric fish Eigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei). Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 1973, 87, 137–164.10.1007/BF01352158 ↗
6. von der Emde G. Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 1990, 167, 413–421.10.1007/BF00192576 ↗
7. von der Emde G, Bleckmann H. Extreme phase sensitivity of afferents which innervate mormyromast electroreceptors. Naturwissenschaften, 1992, 79, 131–133.10.1007/BF01131542 ↗
8. von der Emde G. Capacitance detection in the wave-type electric fish Eigenmannia during active electrolocation. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 1998, 182, 217–224.10.1007/s003590050172 ↗
9. Schwan H P. Determination of biological impedances. In: Nestuk, W L (ed). Physical Techniques in Biological Research, Academic Press, New York, 1963, VI, 323–407.
10. Meyer J H. Behavioral responses of weakly electric fish to complex impedances. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 1982, 145, 459–470.10.1007/BF00612811 ↗
11. von der Emde G, Ringer T. Electrolocation of capacitive objects in four species of pulse-type weakly electric fish. I. Discrimination performance. Ethology, 1992, 91, 326–338.10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00873.x ↗
12. von der Emde G, Ronacher B. Perception of electric properties of objects in electrolocating weakly electric fish: Two-dimensional similarity scaling reveals a City-Block metric. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 1994, 175, 801–812.10.1007/BF00191852 ↗
13. Lissmann H W, Machin K E. The mechanism of object location in Gymnarchus niloticus and similar fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1958, 35, 451–486.10.1242/jeb.35.2.451 ↗
14. von der Emde G, Zelick R. Behavioral detection of electric signal waveform distortion in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 1995, 177, 493–501.10.1007/BF00187484 ↗
15. von der Emde G, Schwarz S, Gomez L, Budelli R, Grant K. Electric fish measure distance in the dark. Nature, 1998, 395, 890–894.10.1038/27655 ↗
16. von der Emde G. Non-visual environmental imaging and object detection through active electrolocation in weakly electric fish. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 2006, 192, 601–612.10.1007/s00359-006-0096-7 ↗