Longitudinal Flight Dynamic Analysis on Vertical Takeoff of a Tailless Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicle
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper first analyzed the longitudinal dynamic behavior during vertical takeoff without control of a Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicle (FW-MAV). The standard linear flight dynamics based on small disturbances from trim condition was not applicable for our analysis because the initial flight condition, which was at rest on the ground, could be such a large disturbance from the trim condition that the linearization is invalid. Therefore, we derived linearized Equations of Motion (EoM) which can treat an untrimmed flight condition as a reference for disturbances. The Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) software ANSYS Fluent was used to compute the aerodynamic forces and pitching moments. Three flight modes were found: a fast subsidence mode, a slow subsidence mode and a divergence oscillatory mode. Due to divergence oscillatory mode, the deviation from the reference flight grew with time; the FW-MAV tumbled without control. The simulation showed for the first 0.5 second after leaving the ground (the time that is long enough for delay of feedback control), the FW-MAV flew up to a height of 6 cm with small horizontal and pitching motion, which is close to a vertical flight.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Robotic Locomotion and Control · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Jansen M. Biology and physics of locust flight III: The aerodynamics of locust flight. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 1956, 239, 511–552.10.1098/rstb.1956.0009 ↗
2. Rayner J M V. A new approach to animal flight mechanics. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1979, 80, 17–54.10.1242/jeb.80.1.17 ↗
3. Dickinson M H, Lehman F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamics basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284 1954–1960.10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 ↗
4. Sane S P. The aerodynamics of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 4191–4208.10.1242/jeb.00663 ↗
5. Nguyen T T, Byun D. Two-dimensional aerodynamic models of insect flight for robotic flapping wing mechanisms of maximum efficiency. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5, 1–11.10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60001-3 ↗
6. Nguyen Q V, Truong Q T, Park H C, Goo N S, Byun D. Measurement of force produced by an insect-mimicking flapping-wing system. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S94–S102.10.1016/S1672-6529(09)60222-5 ↗
7. Truong Q T, Phan H V, Park H C, Ko J H. Effect of wing twisting on aerodynamic performance of flapping wing system. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51, 1612–1620.10.2514/1.J051831 ↗
8. Ma K Y, Chirarattananon P, Fuller S B, Wood R J. Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science, 2013, 340, 603–607.10.1126/science.1231806 ↗
9. Taylor G K, Thomas A L R. Dynamic flight stability in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 2803–2829.10.1242/jeb.00501 ↗
10. Sun M, Xiong Y. Dynamic flight stability of a hovering bumblebee. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005, 208, 447–459.10.1242/jeb.01407 ↗
11. Sun M, Wang J, Xiong Y. Dynamic flight stability of hovering insects. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2007, 23, 231–246.10.1007/s10409-007-0068-3 ↗
12. Gao N, Aono H, Liu H. A numerical analysis of dynamic flight stability of hawkmoth hovering. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, 2009, 4, 105–116.10.1299/jbse.4.105 ↗
13. Faruque I, Humbert J S. Dipteran insect flight dynamics Part 1: Longitudinal motion about hover. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2010, 264, 538–552.10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.02.018 ↗
14. Cheng B, Deng X. Translational and rotational damping of flapping flight and its dynamics and stability at hovering. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2011, 27, 849–864.10.1109/TRO.2011.2156170 ↗
15. Liang B, Sun M. Dynamic flight stability of a hovering model dragonfly. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2014, 348, 100–112.
16. Zhang Y, Sun M. Dynamic flight stability of a hovering model insect: Lateral motion. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2010, 26, 175–190.10.1007/s10409-009-0303-1 ↗
17. Faruque I, Humbert J S. Dipteran insect flight dynamics part 2: Lateral–directional motion about hover. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2010, 265, 306–313.10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.05.003 ↗
18. Xu N, Sun M. Lateral dynamic flight stability of a model bumblebee in hovering and forward flight. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2013, 319, 102–115.10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.11.033 ↗
19. Xu N, Sun M. Lateral dynamic flight stability of a model hoverfly in normal and inclined stroke-plane hovering. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2014, 9, 036019.10.1088/1748-3182/9/3/036019 ↗
20. Kim J K, Han J H. A multibody approach for 6-DOF flight dynamics and stability analysis of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2014, 9, 016011.10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016011 ↗
21. Xiong Y, Sun M. Dynamic flight stability of a bumblebee in forward flight. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2008, 24, 25–36.10.1007/s10409-007-0121-2 ↗
22. Kim J K, Han J S, Lee J S, Han J H. Hovering and forward flight of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta: Trim search and 6-DOF dynamic stability characterization. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2015, 10, 056012.10.1088/1748-3190/10/5/056012 ↗
23. Etkin B, Reid L D. Dynamics of Flight: Stability and Control, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1996.
24. Bimbard G, Kolomenskiy D, Bouteleus O, Casas J, Godoy-Diana R. Force balance in the takeoff of a pierid butterfly: Relative importance and timing of leg impulsion and aerodynamic forces. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2013, 216, 3551–3563.10.1242/jeb.084699 ↗
25. Chen M W, Sun M. Wing/body kinematics measurement and force and moment analyses of the takeoff flight of fruitflies. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2014, 30, 495–506.10.1007/s10409-014-0059-0 ↗
26. Chen M W, Zhang Y L, Sun M. Wing and body motion and aerodynamic and leg forces during take-off in droneflies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2013, 10, 20130808.10.1098/rsif.2013.0808 ↗
27. Kolomenskiy D, Maeda M, Engels T, Liu H, Schneider K, Nave J C. Aerodynamic ground effect in fruitfly sized insect takeoff. PLOS One, 2016, 11, e0152072.10.1371/journal.pone.0152072 ↗
28. Liang B, Sun M. Nonlinear flight dynamics and stability of hovering model insects. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2013, 10, 20130269.10.1098/rsif.2013.0269 ↗
29. Phan H V, Kang T, Park H C. Design and stable flight of a 21 g insect-like tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle with angular rates feedback control. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2017, 12, 1–17.
30. Hedrick T. Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3, 034001.10.1088/1748-3182/3/3/034001 ↗
31. Truong Q T, Nguyen Q V, Truong V T, Park H C, Byun D Y, Goo N S. A modified blade element theory for estimation of forces generated by a beetle-mimicking flapping wing system. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2011, 6, 036008.10.1088/1748-3182/6/3/036008 ↗
32. Meng X G, Sun M. Aerodynamics and vortical structures in hovering fruitflies. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27, 031901.10.1063/1.4914042 ↗
33. Atkinson K E. An Introduction to Numerical Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1989.
34. Taylor G K, Thomas A L R. Animal flight dynamics. II. Longitudinal stability in flapping flight. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2002, 214, 351–370.10.1006/jtbi.2001.2470 ↗