journal article·2025-01

Comprehensive Evaluation of Biomechanical and Biological Properties of the Porous Irregular Scaffolds Based on Voronoi-tessellation

Yuzhu Wang, Chenhao Ma, Yufeng Wu, Dawei Gao, Yue Meng, Haibin Wang

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 22· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen, H., Han, Q., Wang, C., Liu, Y., Chen, B., & Wang, J. (2020). Porous scaffold design for additive manufacturing in orthopedics: A review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,8, 609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.0060910.3389/fbioe.2020.00609 ↗
2. Diederichs, G., Link, T. M., Kentenich, M., Schwieger, K., Huber, M. B., Burghardt, A. J., Majumdar, S., Rogalla, P., & Issever, A. S. (2009). Assessment of trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus using multi-detector CT: Correlation with microCT and biomechanical testing. Bone,44(5), 976–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2009.01.37210.1016/j.bone.2009.01.372 ↗
3. Gómez, S., Vlad, M. D., López, J., & Fernández, E. (2016). Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia,42, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.03210.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032 ↗
4. Castro, A. P. G., Ruben, R. B., Gonçalves, S. B., Pinheiro, J., Guedes, J. M., & Fernandes, P. R. (2019). Numerical and experimental evaluation of TPMS gyroid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering,22(6), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2019.156963810.1080/10255842.2019.1569638 ↗
5. Zhou, Y., Isaksson, P., & Persson, C. (2023). An improved trabecular bone model based on voronoi tessellation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials,148, 106172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10617210.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106172 ↗
6. Chen, H., Liu, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, A., Chen, B., Han, Q., & Wang, J. (2021). Design and properties of biomimetic irregular scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Computers in Biology and Medicine,130, 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.10424110.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104241 ↗
7. Zou, S., Gong, H., & Gao, J. (2022). Additively manufactured multilevel voronoi-lattice scaffolds with bonelike mechanical properties. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering,8(7), 3022–3037. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0148210.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c01482 ↗
8. Wang, X., Chen, J., Dong, X., Guan, Y., & Kang, Y. (2023). Design and mechanical properties analysis of heterogeneous porous scaffolds based on bone slice images. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering,39(3), e3673. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.367310.1002/cnm.3673 ↗
9. Shen, M., Li, Y., Lu, F., Gou, Y., Zhong, C., He, S., Zhao, C., Yang, G., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Gou, Z., & Xu, S. (2023). Bioceramic scaffolds with triply periodic minimal surface architectures guide early-stage bone regeneration. Bioactive Materials,25, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.01210.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.02.012 ↗
10. Dong, Z., & Zhao, X. (2021). Application of TPMS structure in bone regeneration. Engineered Regeneration,2, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2023.09.00410.1016/j.engreg.2023.09.004 ↗
11. Mamuti, M., Chao, L., & Tian, Z. (2024). Analysis of mechanical characteristics and permeability of TPMS and voronoi porous structure for bone scaffold. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 29, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.235837810.1080/10255842.2024.2358378 ↗
12. Li, J., Yang, Y., Sun, Z., Peng, K., Liu, K., Xu, P., Li, J., Wei, X., & He, X. (2023). Integrated evaluation of biomechanical and biological properties of the biomimetic structural bone scaffold: Biomechanics, simulation analysis, and osteogenesis. Materials Today. Bio,24, 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.10093410.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100934 ↗
13. Li, J., Guo, D., Li, J., Wei, X., Sun, Z., Yang, B., Lu, T., Ouyang, P., Chang, S., Liu, W., & He, X. (2022). Irregular pore size of degradable bioceramic voronoi scaffolds prepared by stereolithography: Osteogenesis and computational fluid dynamics analysis. Materials & Design,224, 111414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11141410.1016/j.matdes.2022.111414 ↗
14. Wang, G., Shen, L., Zhao, J., Liang, H., Xie, D., Tian, Z., & Wang, C. (2018). Design and compressive behavior of controllable irregular porous scaffolds: Based on voronoi-tessellation and for additive manufacturing. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering,4(2), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0091610.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00916 ↗
15. Zhao, H., Han, Y., Pan, C., Yang, D., Wang, H., Wang, T., Zeng, X., & Su, P. (2021). Design and mechanical properties verification of gradient voronoi scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Micromachines,12(6), 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1206066410.3390/mi12060664 ↗
16. Zhang, X., Zhang, M., Zhang, C., Zhou, T., Wu, X., & Yue, X. (2022). Prediction and numerical study of thermal performance of gradient porous structures based on voronoi tessellation design. Materials (Basel, Switzerland),15(22), 8046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1522804610.3390/ma15228046 ↗
17. Alknery, Z., Sktani, Z. D. I., & Arab, A. (2022). Effect of cell geometry on the mechanical properties of 3D voronoi tessellation. Journal of Functional Biomaterials,13(4), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb1304030210.3390/jfb13040302 ↗
18. Vossenberg, P., Higuera, G. A., van Straten, G., van Blitterswijk, C. A., & van Boxtel, A. J. (2009). Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology,8(6), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-009-0153-610.1007/s10237-009-0153-6 ↗
19. Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005). Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials,26(27), 5474–5491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
20. Sinha, R., Le Gac, S., Verdonschot, N., van den Berg, A., Koopman, B., & Rouwkema, J. (2016). Endothelial cell alignment as a result of anisotropic strain and flow induced shear stress combinations. Scientific Reports,6, 29510. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2951010.1038/srep29510 ↗
21. Deng, F., Liu, L., Li, Z., & Liu, J. (2021). 3D printed Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds with different pore structure effects on bone ingrowth. Journal of Biological Engineering,15(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-021-00255-810.1186/s13036-021-00255-8 ↗
22. Arabnejad Khanoki, S., & Pasini, D. (2013). Fatigue design of a mechanically biocompatible lattice for a proof-of-concept femoral stem. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials,22, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.03.002 ↗
23. Porter, D. A., Di Prima, M. A., Badhe, Y., & Parikh, A. R. (2022). Nylon lattice design parameter effects on additively manufactured structural performance. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials,125, 104869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10486910.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104869 ↗
24. Wang, M., Wang, Y., Meng, Y., & Pan, C. (2023). Functionally graded stem optimizes the fixed and sliding surface coupling mechanism. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.229365410.1080/10255842.2023.2293654 ↗
25. Gómez González, S., Valera Jiménez, J. F., Cabestany Bastida, G., Vlad, M. D., López López, J., & Fernández Aguado, E. (2020). Synthetic open cell foams versus a healthy human vertebra: anisotropy, fluid flow and μ-CT structural studies. Materials Science & Engineering.C, Materials for Biological Applications,108, 110404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11040410.1016/j.msec.2019.110404 ↗
26. Ma, S., Song, K., Lan, J., & Ma, L. (2020). Biological and mechanical property analysis for designed heterogeneous porous scaffolds based on the refined TPMS. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials,107, 103727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10372710.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103727 ↗
27. Xu, S., Zhang, S., Ren, G., Pan, Y., & Li, J. (2022). Optimization of structural and processing parameters for selective laser melting of porous 316L bone scaffolds. Materials (Basel, Switzerland),15(17), 5896. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1517589610.3390/ma15175896 ↗
28. Li, L., Wang, P., Liang, H., Jin, J., Zhang, Y., Shi, J., Zhang, Y., He, S., Mao, H., Xue, B., Lai, J., Zhu, L., & Jiang, Q. (2023). Design of a haversian system-like gradient porous scaffold based on triply periodic minimal surfaces for promoting bone regeneration. Journal of Advanced Research,54, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2023.01.00410.1016/j.jare.2023.01.004 ↗
29. Kovács, Á. É., Csernátony, Z., Csámer, L., Méhes, G., Szabó, D., Veres, M., Braun, M., Harangi, B., Serbán, N., Zhang, L., Falk, G., Soósné Horváth, H., & Manó, S. (2023). Comparative analysis of bone ingrowth in 3D-printed titanium lattice structures with different patterns. Materials (Basel, Switzerland),16(10), 3861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1610386110.3390/ma16103861 ↗
30. Kiselevskiy, M. V., Anisimova, N. Y., Kapustin, A. V., Ryzhkin, A. A., Kuznetsova, D. N., Polyakova, V. V., & Enikeev, N. A. (2023). Development of bioactive scaffolds for orthopedic applications by designing additively manufactured titanium porous structures: A critical review. Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland),8(7), 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics807054610.3390/biomimetics8070546 ↗
31. Carpenter, R. D., Klosterhoff, B. S., Torstrick, F. B., Foley, K. T., Burkus, J. K., Lee, C. S. D., Gall, K., Guldberg, R. E., & Safranski, D. L. (2018). Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials,80, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.01710.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.017 ↗
32. Di Luca, A., Longoni, A., Criscenti, G., Mota, C., van Blitterswijk, C., & Moroni, L. (2016). Toward mimicking the bone structure: Design of novel hierarchical scaffolds with a tailored radial porosity gradient. Biofabrication,8(4), 045007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/4/04500710.1088/1758-5090/8/4/045007 ↗
33. Ouyang, P., Dong, H., He, X., Cai, X., Wang, Y., Li, J., Li, H., & Jin, Z. (2019). Hydromechanical mechanism behind the effect of pore size of porous titanium scaffolds on osteoblast response and bone ingrowth. Materials & Design,183, 108151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10815110.1016/j.matdes.2019.108151 ↗
34. Zhao, Z., Li, J., Yao, D., & Wei, Y. (2022). Mechanical and permeability properties of porous scaffolds developed by a voronoi tessellation for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Chemistry. B,10(46), 9699–9712. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb01478e10.1039/d2tb01478e ↗
35. Arabnejad, S., Burnett Johnston, R., Pura, J. A., Singh, B., Tanzer, M., & Pasini, D. (2016). High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: A strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomaterialia,30, 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.04810.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048 ↗
36. Zhang, L., Yang, G., Johnson, B. N., & Jia, X. (2019). Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. Acta Biomaterialia,84, 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.03910.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039 ↗