journal article·2026-03Open access

Phased-Enhancement Marine Predators Algorithm for Global Optimization and Medical Insurance Fraud Detection

Wen Long, Yujia Wang, Qinghua Long, Yang Yang, Ming Xu

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 23· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract The Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA), while promising for complex optimization, suffers from limited solution precision, imbalanced exploration–exploitation, and premature convergence. To address these shortcomings, this paper proposes a phased- enhancement variant named PEMPA, which integrates three novel strategies into distinct phases of MPA: 1) embedding historical best positions in the high-velocity ratio phase to refine solution quality; 2) introducing an adaptive inertia weight based on an inverted Sigmoid function in the unit-velocity ratio phase to systematically balance exploration and exploitation; and 3) designing a two-stage opposition-based learning operator in the low-velocity ratio phase to prevent premature convergence. The performance of PEMPA is comprehensively evaluated across 23 classical benchmark functions, the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2017 test suite, 21 feature selection tasks, and a real-world medical insurance fraud detection problem. Experimental results confirm that the proposed strategies significantly enhance the efficiency and robustness of MPA. Furthermore, PEMPA demonstrates highly competitive performance compared with several state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms, validating its effectiveness and scalability for diverse optimization challenges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Risk and Portfolio Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Hammouri, A. I., Awadallah, M. A., Braik, M. S., Al-Betar, M. A., & Beseiso, M. (2024). Improved dwarf mongoose optimization algorithm for feature selection: Application in software fault prediction datasets. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 21, 2000–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-024-00524-410.1007/s42235-024-00524-4 ↗
2. Anosri, S., Panagant, N., Champasak, P., Bureerat, S., Thipyopas, C., Kumar, S., Pholdee, N., Yildiz, B. S., & Yildiz, A. R. (2023). A comparative study of state-of-the-art metaheuristics for solving many-objective optimization problems of fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle conceptual design. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 3657–3671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09914-z10.1007/s11831-023-09914-z ↗
3. Karaduman, A., Yildiz, B. S., & Yildiz, A. R. (2019). Experimental and numerical fatigue-based design optimisation of clutch diaphragm spring in the automotive industry. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 80, 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2019.10987510.1504/IJVD.2019.109875 ↗
4. Yu, Y., Gao, S., Zhou, M., Wang, Y., Lei, Z., Zhang, T., & Wang, J. (2022). Scale-free network-based differential evolution to solve function optimization and parameter estimation of photovoltaic models. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 74, Article 101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2022.10114210.1016/j.swevo.2022.101142 ↗
5. Gürses, D., Mehta, P., Sait, S. M., & Yildiz, A. R. (2022). African vultures optimization algorithm for optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers. Materials Testing, 64, 1234–1241. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-005010.1515/mt-2022-0050 ↗
6. Heidari, A. A., Mirjalili, S., Faris, H., Aljarah, I., Mafarja, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 849–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.02810.1016/j.future.2019.02.028 ↗
7. Yildiz, A. R. (2013). Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using hybrid teaching learning-based approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66, 1319–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4410-y10.1007/s00170-012-4410-y ↗
8. Long, W., Jiao, H., Yang, Y., Xu, M., Tang, M., & Wu, T. (2025). Planar-mirror reflection imaging learning based seagull optimization algorithm for global optimization and feature selection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 317, Article 113420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2025.11342010.1016/j.knosys.2025.113420 ↗
9. Li, S., Chen, H., Wang, M., Heidari, A. A., & Mirjalili, S. (2020). Slime mould algorithm: A new method for stochastic optimization. Future Generation Computer System, 111, 300–323.10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055 ↗
10. Yildiz, B. S., Pholdee, N., Mehta, P., Sait, S. M., Kumar, S., Bureerat, S., & Yildiz, A. R. (2023). A novel hybrid flow direction optimizer-dynamic oppositional based learning algorithm for solving complex constrained mechanical design problems. Materials Testing, 65, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-018310.1515/mt-2022-0183 ↗
11. Sait, S. M., Mehta, P., Gürses, D., & Yildiz, A. R. (2023). Cheetah optimization algorithm for optimum design of heat exchangers. Materials Testing, 65, 1230–1236. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-001510.1515/mt-2023-0015 ↗
12. Chopra, N., & Ansari, M. M. (2022). Golden jackal optimization: A novel nature-inspired optimizer for engineering applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 198, Article 116924.10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116924 ↗
13. Wang, L., Cao, Q., Zhang, Z., Mirjalili, S., & Zhao, W. (2022). Artificial rabbits optimization: A new bio-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 114, Article 105082.10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105082 ↗
14. Xu, X. (2025). Crocodile ambush optimization algorithm: A new bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Array, 28, Article 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.10052910.1016/j.array.2025.100529 ↗
15. Abdollahzadeh, B., Gharehchopogh, F. S., & Khodadadi, N. (2022). Mountain gazelle optimizer: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems. Advances in Engineering Software, 174, Article 103282.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103282 ↗
16. Mohammed, B. O., Aghdasi, H. S., & Salehpour, P. (2025). Dhole optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Cluster Computing, 28, Article 430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-05005-110.1007/s10586-024-05005-1 ↗
17. Wang, Y., Zheng, H., Wu, Q., Yang, S., & Zhou, Y. (2025). White-faced capuchin optimizer: A new bionic metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Journal of Supercomputing, 81, 236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06713-610.1007/s11227-024-06713-6 ↗
18. Gürses, D., Mehta, P., Sait, S. M., Kumar, S., & Yildiz, A. R. (2023). A multi-strategy boosted prairie dog optimization algorithm for global optimization of heat exchangers. Materials Testing, 65, 1396–1404. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-008210.1515/mt-2023-0082 ↗
19. Naruei, I., & Keynia, F. (2022). Wild horse optimizer: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 38, 3025–3056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01438-z10.1007/s00366-021-01438-z ↗
20. Ehsaeyan, E. (2025). Gold seekers algorithm: An innovative metaheuristic approach for global optimization and its application in image segmentation. International Journal of Engineering, 38, 2114–2129. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2025.38.09c.0910.5829/ije.2025.38.09c.09 ↗
21. Ghasemi, M., Khodadadi, N., Trojovsky, P., Li, L., Mansor, Z., Abualigah, L., Alharbi, A. H., & El-Kenawy, E. M. (2025). Kirchhoff’s law algorithm (KLA): A novel physics-inspired non-parametric metaheuristic algorithm for optimization problems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, Article 325.10.1007/s10462-025-11289-5 ↗
22. Sulaiman, M. H., Mustaffa, Z., Saari, M. M., Daniyal, H., & Mirjalili, S. (2023). Evolutionary mating algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 35, 487–516.10.1007/s00521-022-07761-w ↗
23. Fu, Y., Liu, D., Chen, J., & He, L. (2024). Secretary bird optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic for solving global optimization problems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, Article 123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10729-y10.1007/s10462-024-10729-y ↗
24. Ghaedi, A., Bardsiri, A. K., & Shahbazzadeh, M. J. (2023). Cat hunting optimization algorithm: A novel optimization algorithm. Evolutionary Intelligence, 16, 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00668-w10.1007/s12065-021-00668-w ↗
25. Amiri, M. H., Hashjin, N. M., Montazeri, M., Mirjalili, S., & Khodadadi, N. (2024). Hippopotamus optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired optimization algorithm. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 5032. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54910-310.1038/s41598-024-54910-3 ↗
26. Al-kubaisy, W. J., & Al-Khateeb, B. (2024). Quokka swarm optimization: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33, Article 20240051. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2024-005110.1515/jisys-2024-0051 ↗
27. Wang, W., Tian, W., Xu, D., & Zang, H. (2024). Arctic puffin optimization: A bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering design optimization. Advances in Engineering Software, 195, Article 103694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.10369410.1016/j.advengsoft.2024.103694 ↗
28. Cheng, M. Y., & Sholeh, M. N. (2025). Artificial satellite search: A new metaheuristic algorithm for optimizing truss structure design and project scheduling. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 143, Article 116008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2025.11600810.1016/j.apm.2025.116008 ↗
29. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., & Abouhawwahs, M. (2025). Fungal growth optimizer: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for stochastic optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 437, Article 117825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.11782510.1016/j.cma.2025.117825 ↗
30. Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.58589310.1109/4235.585893 ↗
31. Faramarzi, A., Mohammad, H., Mirjalili, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2020). Marine predators algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Systems with Applications, 152, Article 113377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.11337710.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377 ↗
32. Shen, B., Khishe, M., & Mirjalili, S. (2023). Evolving marine predators algorithm by dynamic foraging strategy for real-world engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123, Article 106207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10620710.1016/j.engappai.2023.106207 ↗
33. Ho, L. V., Nguyen, D. H., Mousavi, M., Roeck, G. D., Bui-Tien, T., Gandomi, A. H., & Wahab, M. A. (2021). A hybrid computational intelligence approach for structural damage detection using marine predators algorithm and feed forward neural networks. Computers & Structures, 252, Article 106568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.10656810.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106568 ↗
34. Elaziz, M. A., Thanikanti, S. B., Ibrahim, I. A., Lu, S., Nastasi, B., Alotaibi, M. A., Hossain, M. A., & Yousri, D. (2021). Enhanced marine predators algorithm for identifying static and dynamic photovoltaic models parameters. Energy Conversion and Management, 236, Article 113971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.11397110.1016/j.enconman.2021.113971 ↗
35. Rezaei, K., & Fard, O. S. (2024). Multi-strategy enhanced marine predators algorithm with applications in engineering optimization and feature selection problems. Applied Soft Computing, 159, Article 111650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.11165010.1016/j.asoc.2024.111650 ↗
36. Chen, J., Luo, Q., Zhou, Y., & Huang, H. (2023). Firefighting multi strategy marine predators algorithm for the early-stage forest fire rescue problem. Applied Intelligence, 53, 15496–15515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04265-x10.1007/s10489-022-04265-x ↗
37. Houssein, E. H., Hussain, K., Abualigah, L., Elaziz, M. A., Alomoush, W., Dhiman, G., Djenouri, Y., & Cuevas, E. (2021). An improved opposition-based marine predators algorithm for global optimization and multilevel thresholding image segmentation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 229, Article 107348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.10734810.1016/j.knosys.2021.107348 ↗
38. Al-qaness, M. A. A., Ewees, A. A., Fan, H., Abualigah, L., & Elaziz, M. A. (2022). Boosted ANFIS model using augmented marine predator algorithm with mutation operators for wind power forecasting. Applied Energy, 314, Article 118851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.11885110.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118851 ↗
39. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Elhoseny, M., Bashir, A. K., Jolfaei, A., & Kumar, N. (2021). Energy-aware marine predators algorithm for task scheduling in IoT-based fog computing applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17, 5068–5076. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.300106710.1109/TII.2020.3001067 ↗
40. Helmi, A. M., Al-qaness, M. A. A., Dahou, A., & Elaziz, M. A. (2023). Human activity recognition using marine predators algorithm with deep learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 142, 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.01.00610.1016/j.future.2023.01.006 ↗
41. Hu, G., Zhu, X., Wang, X., & Wei, G. (2022). Multi-strategy boosted marine predators algorithm for optimizing approximate developable surface. Knowledge-Based Systems, 254, Article 109615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.10961510.1016/j.knosys.2022.109615 ↗
42. Yu, Q., Lin, J., Ma, X., Li, B., Xu, L., & Wang, T. (2023). Efficiency optimization of wireless power transfer system for electric vehicle based on improved marine predators algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24, 7847–7858. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022.322995810.1109/TITS.2022.3229958 ↗
43. Rezk, H., Inayat, A., Abdelkareem, M. A., Olabi, A. G., & Nassef, A. M. (2022). Optimal operating parameter determination based on fuzzy logic modeling and marine predators algorithm approaches to improve the methane production via biomass gasification. Energy, 239, Article 122072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.12207210.1016/j.energy.2021.122072 ↗
44. Tang, M., Yi, J., Long, W., Feng, F., Chen, W., & Liu, L. (2023). A multi-stage, multi-strategy-improved marine predators algorithm and its application in wind turbine fault detection. Applied and Computational Mathematics, 22, 372–408. https://doi.org/10.30546/1683-6154.22.3.2023.37210.30546/1683-6154.22.3.2023.372 ↗
45. Wang, J., Guo, H., Li, Z., Song, A., & Niu, X. (2023). Quantile deep learning model and multi-objective opposition elite marine predator optimization algorithm for wind speed prediction. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 115, 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2022.10.05210.1016/j.apm.2022.10.052 ↗
46. Ikram, R. M. A., Ewees, A. A., Parmar, K. S., Yaseen, Z. M., Shahid, S., & Kisi, O. (2022). The viability of extended marine predator algorithm-based artificial neural networks for streamflow prediction. Applied Soft Computing, 131, Article 109739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.10973910.1016/j.asoc.2022.109739 ↗
47. Yousri, D., Ousama, A., Shaker, Y., Fathy, A., Babu, T. S., Rezk, H., & Allam, D. (2022). Managing the exchange of energy between microgrid elements based on multi-objective enhanced marine predators algorithm. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61, 8487–8505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.02.00810.1016/j.aej.2022.02.008 ↗
48. Cang, H., Zeng, X., & Yan, S. (2024). A novel grey multivariate convolution model based on the improved marine predators algorithm for predicting fossil CO2 emissions in China. Expert Systems with Applications, 243, Article 122865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.12286510.1016/j.eswa.2023.122865 ↗
49. Özdemir, R., Tasyürek, M., & Aslantas, V. (2024). Improved marine predators algorithm and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for shipment status time prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 294, Article 111775.10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111775 ↗
50. Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Gao, Y., Zhao, G., Houssein, E. H., & Zhong, R. (2025). Multi-strategy enhanced marine predator algorithm: Performance investigation and application in intrusion detection. Journal of Big Data, 12(1), Article 38.10.1186/s40537-025-01080-2 ↗
51. Al-Betar, M. A., Awadallah, M. A., Makhadmeh, S. N., Alyasseri, Z. A. A., Al-Naymat, G., & Mirjalili, S. (2023). Marine predators algorithm: A review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 3405–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09912-110.1007/s11831-023-09912-1 ↗
52. Ramezani, M., Bahmanyar, D., & Razmjooy, N. (2021). A new improved model of marine predator algorithm for optimization problems. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46, 8803–8826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05688-310.1007/s13369-021-05688-3 ↗
53. Houssein, E. H., Mahdy, M. A., Fathy, A., & Rezk, H. (2021). A modified marine predator algorithm based on opposition based learning for tracking the global MPP of shaded PV system. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, Article 115253.10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115253 ↗
54. Yousri, D., Elaziz, M. A., Oliva, D., Abraham, A., Alotaibi, M. A., & Hossain, M. A. (2022). Fractional-order comprehensive learning marine predators algorithm for global optimization and feature selection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 235, Article 107603.10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107603 ↗
55. Oszust, M. (2021). Enhanced marine predators algorithm with local escaping operator for global optimization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 232, Article 107467.10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107467 ↗
56. Zhao, S., Wu, Y., Tan, S., Wu, J., Cui, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023). QQLMPA: A quasi-opposition learning and Q-learning based marine predators algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, Article 119246.10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119246 ↗
57. Han, M., Du, Z., Zhu, H., Li, Y., Yuan, Q., & Zhu, H. (2022). Golden-sine dynamic marine predator algorithm for addressing engineering design optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 210, Article 118460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11846010.1016/j.eswa.2022.118460 ↗
58. Issa, M., Elaziz, M. A., & Selem, S. I. (2025). Enhanced hunger games search algorithm that incorporates the marine predator optimization algorithm for optimal extraction of parameters in PEM fuel cells. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 4474. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87695-010.1038/s41598-025-87695-0 ↗
59. Kumar, S., Yildiz, B. S., Mehta, P., Panagant, N., Sait, S. M., Mirjalili, S., & Yildiz, A. R. (2024). Chaotic marine predators algorithm for global optimization of real-world engineering problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 261, Article 110192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.11019210.1016/j.knosys.2022.110192 ↗
60. Makhadmeh, S. N., Al-Betar, M. A., Abasi, A. K., Al-Redhaei, A., & Alomari, O. A. (2024). A hybrid marine predators algorithm with particle swarm optimization using renewable energy sources for energy scheduling problem-based IoT. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49, 12655–12678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08755-710.1007/s13369-024-08755-7 ↗
61. Zhao, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhang, S., Tolba, A., Alfarraj, O., & Yu, K. (2025). WMPA-ConvBERT-BM: A hybrid deep learning model optimized by whale-marine predator algorithm for IoT-enabled malicious URL detection. Internet of Things, 33, Article 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2025.10168310.1016/j.iot.2025.101683 ↗
62. Shi, Y., & Eberhart, R. (1998). A modified particle swarm optimizer. in: Proceedings of IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, pp.69–73.10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146 ↗
63. Parmaksiz, H., Yuzgec, U., Dokur, E., & Erdogan, N. (2023). Mutation based improved dragonfly optimization algorithm for a neuro- fuzzy system in short term wind speed forecasting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 268, Article 110472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.11047210.1016/j.knosys.2023.110472 ↗
64. Ahmed, M., Kamel, S. H., Abbasy, N. H., & Abouelseoud, Y. (2023). A Gaussian random walk salp swarm algorithm for optimal dynamic charging of electric vehicles. Applied Soft Computing, 147, Article 110838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.11083810.1016/j.asoc.2023.110838 ↗
65. Abualigah, L., Elaziz, M. A., Yousri, D., Al-qaness, M. A. A., Ewees, A. A., & Zitar, R. A. (2023). Augmented arithmetic optimization algorithm using opposite-based learning and lévy flight distribution for global optimization and data clustering. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 34, 3523–3561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02016-w10.1007/s10845-022-02016-w ↗
66. Arini, F. Y., Chiewchanwattana, S., Soomlek, C., & Sunat, K. (2022). Joint opposite selection (JOS): A premiere joint of selective leading opposition and dynamic opposite enhanced Harris hawks optimization for solving single-objective problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 188, Article 116001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11600110.1016/j.eswa.2021.116001 ↗
67. Long, W., Wu, T., Liang, X., & Xu, S. (2019). Solving high-dimensional global optimization problems using an improved sine cosine algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 123, 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.03210.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.032 ↗
68. Sadiq, A. S., Dehkordi, A. A., Mirjalili, S., & Pham, Q. V. (2022). Nonlinear marine predator algorithm: A cost-effective optimizer for fair power allocation in NOMA-VLC-B5G networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 203, Article 117395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11739510.1016/j.eswa.2022.117395 ↗
69. Awad, N. H., Ali, M. Z., Liang, J., Qu, B., & Suganthan, P. N. (2016). Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2017 special session and competition on single objective bound constrained real-parameter numerical optimization, Technical Report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
70. Long, W., Jiao, J., Xu, M., Tang, M., Wu, T., & Cai, S. (2022). Lens-imaging learning Harris hawks optimizer for global optimization and its application to feature selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 202, Article 117255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11725510.1016/j.eswa.2022.117255 ↗
71. Gharehchopogh, F. S., Maleki, I., & Dizaji, Z. A. (2022). Chaotic vortex search algorithm: Metaheuristic algorithm for feature selection. Evolutionary Intelligence, 15, 1777–1808.10.1007/s12065-021-00590-1 ↗
72. Frank, A. (2010). UCI machine learning repository, https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/index.php.
73. Morris, L. (2009). Combating fraud in health care: An essential component of any cost containment strategy. Health Affairs, 28, 1351–1356. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.135110.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1351 ↗
74. Cheng, F., Yan, C., Liu, W., & Lin, X. (2024). Research on medical insurance anti-gang fraud model based on the knowledge graph. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 134, Article 108627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10862710.1016/j.engappai.2024.108627 ↗
75. Xie, R., Li, S., & Wu, F. (2024). An improved northern goshawk optimization algorithm for feature selection. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 21, 2034–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-024-00515-510.1007/s42235-024-00515-5 ↗
76. Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Bilal, M., Dou, W., Xu, X., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2022). Identifying fraud in medical insurance based on blockchain and deep learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 130, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.12.00610.1016/j.future.2021.12.006 ↗
77. Salmi, M., Atif, D., Oliva, D., Abraham, A., & Ventura, S. (2024). Handling imbalanced medical datasets: Review of a decade of research. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, Article 273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10884-210.1007/s10462-024-10884-2 ↗