Functional Graded PEEK Cellular Lattice as a Bone Implant

1. Evans, S. L., & Gregson, P. J. (1998). Composite technology in load-bearing orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials, 19, 1329–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00217-210.1016/S0142-9612(97)00217-2 ↗

2. Wu, S., Liu, X., Yeung, K. W. K., Liu, C., & Yang, X. (2014). Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science & Engineering. R, Reports, 80, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 ↗

3. Qureshi, Z. A., Elnajjar, E., Al-Ketan, O., Al-Rub, R. A., & Al-Omari, S. B. (2021). Heat transfer performance of a finned metal foam-phase change material (FMF-PCM) system incorporating triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS). International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 170, Article 121001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.12100110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121001 ↗

4. Geetha, M., Singh, A. K., Asokamani, R., & Gogia, A. K. (2009). Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – a review. Progress in Materials Science, 54(3), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004 ↗

5. Pohler, O. E. M. (2000). Unalloyed titanium for implants in bone surgery. Injury, 31, D7–D13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80016-910.1016/S0020-1383(00)80016-9 ↗

6. Pałka, K., & Pokrowiecki, R. (2018). Porous titanium implants: A review. Advanced Engineering Materials, 20(5), Article 1700648. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20170064810.1002/adem.201700648 ↗

7. Safavi, S., Yu, Y., Robinson, D. L., Gray, H. A., Ackland, D. C., & Lee, P. V. S. (2023). Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: A systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03492-910.1186/s13018-022-03492-9 ↗

8. Sankar, S., Paulraj, J., & Chakraborti, P. (2023). Fused filament fabricated PEEK based polymer composites for orthopaedic implants: A review. International Journal of Materials Research, 114(10–11), 980–988. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijmr-2022-022510.1515/ijmr-2022-0225 ↗

9. Vishal, K., Rajkumar, K., & Annamalai, V. E. (2021). Wear and tribofilm characterization of bamboo CNT (B-CNT)-peek composite with incremental blending of submicron synthetic diamond particles. Wear, 466–467, Article 203556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2020.20355610.1016/j.wear.2020.203556 ↗

10. Yang, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, H., Xiong, S., Chen, P., Li, C., Wang, L., Lu, G., & Xu, Y. (2023). A dual-functional PEEK implant coating for anti-bacterial and accelerated osseointegration. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 224, Article 113196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.11319610.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113196 ↗

11. Dua, R., Rashad, Z., Spears, J., Dunn, G., & Maxwell, M. (2021). Applications of 3D-printed PEEK via fused filament fabrication: A systematic review. Polymers, 13(22), Article 4046. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1322404610.3390/polym13224046 ↗

12. Oladapo, B. I., Ismail, S. O., Ikumapayi, O. M., & Karagiannidis, P. G. (2022). Impact of rGO-coated PEEK and lattice on bone implant. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 216, Article 112583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.11258310.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112583 ↗

13. Vijayavenkataraman, S., Zhang, L., Zhang, S., Hsi Fuh, J. Y., & Lu, W. F. (2018). Triply periodic minimal surfaces sheet scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: An optimization approach toward biomimetic scaffold design. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b0005210.1021/acsabm.8b00052 ↗

14. Huang, D., Li, Z., Li, G., Zhou, F., Wang, G., Ren, X., & Su, J. (2025). Biomimetic structural design in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Today Bio, 32, Article 101664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.10166410.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101664 ↗

15. Timercan, A., Sheremetyev,Vadim,and, & Brailovski, V. (2021). Mechanical properties and fluid permeability of gyroid and diamond lattice structures for intervertebral devices: Functional requirements and comparative analysis. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 22(1), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2021.190722210.1080/14686996.2021.1907222 ↗

16. Gibson, L. J., Farries, A. M., Schajer, G. S., & Robertson, C. I. (1982). The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 382(1782), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1982.008710.1098/rspa.1982.0087 ↗

17. Wang, S., Shi, Z., Liu, L., Huang, Z., Li, Z., Liu, J., & Hao, Y. (2021). Honeycomb structure is promising for the repair of human bone defects. Materials & Design, 207, Article 109832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10983210.1016/j.matdes.2021.109832 ↗

18. Surmeneva, M. A., Surmenev, R. A., Chudinova, E. A., Koptioug, A., Tkachev, M. S., Gorodzha, S. N., & Rännar, L.-E. (2017). Fabrication of multiple-layered gradient cellular metal scaffold via electron beam melting for segmental bone reconstruction. Materials & Design, 133, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.05910.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.059 ↗

19. Tauheed, M., Alsheghri, A., Dalaq, A. S., & Al-Rub, R. K. A. (2025). Bone-inspired lattice structures for biomedical applications: Design, pore network analysis, and mechanical performance. Results in Engineering, 27, Article 105697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10569710.1016/j.rineng.2025.105697 ↗

20. Dalaq, A. S., Abueidda, D. W., Abu Al-Rub, R. K., & Jasiuk, I. M. (2016). Finite element prediction of effective elastic properties of interpenetrating phase composites with architectured 3D sheet reinforcements. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 83, 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.01.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.01.011 ↗

21. Dalaq, A. S., Abueidda, D. W., & Abu Al-Rub, R. K. (2016). Mechanical properties of 3D printed interpenetrating phase composites with novel architectured 3D solid-sheet reinforcements. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 84, 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.009 ↗

22. Abueidda, D. W., Abu Al-Rub, R. K., Dalaq, A. S., Lee, D.-W., Khan, K. A., & Jasiuk, I. (2016). Effective conductivities and elastic moduli of novel foams with triply periodic minimal surfaces. Mechanics of Materials, 95, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.004 ↗

23. Kanwar, S., Al-Ketan, O., & Vijayavenkataraman, S. (2022). A novel method to design biomimetic, 3D printable stochastic scaffolds with controlled porosity for bone tissue engineering. Materials & Design, 220, Article 110857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11085710.1016/j.matdes.2022.110857 ↗

24. Kanwar, S., Al-Ketan, O., Janarthanan, G., & Vijayavenkataraman, S. (2025). Additively manufactured stochastic and gyroid scaffold design towards osseointegration and bone regeneration in a rabbit femur model. Materials & Design, 250, Article 113604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2025.11360410.1016/j.matdes.2025.113604 ↗

25. Yoo, D.-J. (2011). Computer-aided porous scaffold design for tissue engineering using triply periodic minimal surfaces. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 12(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0008-910.1007/s12541-011-0008-9 ↗

26. Dong, Z., & Zhao, X. (2021). Application of TPMS structure in bone regeneration. Engineered Regeneration, 2, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2021.09.00410.1016/j.engreg.2021.09.004 ↗

27. Shi, J., Zhu, L., Li, L., Li, Z., Yang, J., & Wang, X. (2018). A TPMS-based method for modeling porous scaffolds for bionic bone tissue engineering. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 7395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25750-910.1038/s41598-018-25750-9 ↗

28. Luo, D., Su, J., Zou, Y., Hua, S., Cheng, L., Qi, D., Yuan, X., Zhu, H., Liu, C., Shi, Y., & Xiao, J. (2024). 3D-printed triply periodic minimal surface bioceramic scaffold for bone defect treatment with tunable structure and mechanical properties. Ceramics International, 50(20, Part B), 39020–39031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.26810.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.268 ↗

29. Carpenter, R. D., Klosterhoff, B. S., Torstrick, F. B., Foley, K. T., Burkus, J. K., Lee, C. S. D., Gall, K., Guldberg, R. E., & Safranski, D. L. (2018). Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 80, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.01710.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.017 ↗

30. Gao, C., Wang, C., Jin, H., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Shi, C., Leng, Y., Yang, F., Liu, H., & Wang, J. (2018). Additive manufacturing technique-designed metallic porous implants for clinical application in orthopedics. RSC Advances, 8(44), 25210–25227. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA04815K10.1039/C8RA04815K ↗

31. Wang, X., Xu, S., Zhou, S., Xu, W., Leary, M., Choong, P., Qian, M., Brandt, M., & Xie, Y. M. (2016). Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. Biomaterials, 83, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗

32. Zhao, D., Yu, K., Sun, T., Jing, X., Wan, Y., Chen, K., Gao, H., Wang, Y., Chen, L., Guo, X., & Wei, Q. (2023). Material–structure–function integrated additive manufacturing of degradable metallic bone implants for load-bearing applications. Advanced Functional Materials, 33(16), Article 2213128. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20221312810.1002/adfm.202213128 ↗

33. Wang, H., Chen, P., Wu, H., Chen, A., Wu, S., Su, J., Wang, M., Feng, X., Yang, C., Yang, L., Yan, C., & Shi, Y. (2022). Comparative evaluation of printability and compression properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Additive Manufacturing, 57, Article 102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10296110.1016/j.addma.2022.102961 ↗

34. Sabahi, N., Farajzadeh, E., Roohani, I., Wang, C. H., & Li, X. (2024). Material extrusion 3D printing of polyether-ether-ketone scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surface designs: A numerical and experimental investigation. Applied Materials Today, 39, Article 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2024.10226210.1016/j.apmt.2024.102262 ↗

35. Joshua, R. J. N., Raj, S. A., Sultan, M. T. H., Łukaszewicz, A., Józwik, J., Oksiuta, Z., Dziedzic, K., Tofil, A., Shahar, F. S., Joshua, R. J. N., Raj, S. A., Sultan, M. T. H., Łukaszewicz, A., Józwik, J., Oksiuta, Z., Dziedzic, K., Tofil, A., & Shahar, F. S. (2024). Powder bed fusion 3D printing in precision manufacturing for biomedical applications: A comprehensive review. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1703076910.3390/ma17030769 ↗

36. Chen, P., Wang, H., Su, J., Tian, Y., Wen, S., Su, B., Yang, C., Chen, B., Zhou, K., Yan, C., & Shi, Y. (2022). Recent advances on high-performance polyaryletherketone materials for additive manufacturing. Advanced Materials, 34(52), Article 2200750. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20220075010.1002/adma.202200750 ↗

37. Wakjira, Y., Cioni, A., & Lemu, H. G. (2025). Current status of the application of additive-manufactured TPMS structure in bone tissue engineering. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 10(2), 1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00714-w10.1007/s40964-024-00714-w ↗

38. Fang, X., Sang, L., Zong, L., Li, Z., Pan, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, H., Wang, J., & Jian, X. (2025). Development of polyether ether ketone-based composites by fused filament fabrication: High-temperature resistance and high performance. Composites Communications, 54, Article 102283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2025.10228310.1016/j.coco.2025.102283 ↗

39. Spece, H., Yu, T., Law, A. W., Marcolongo, M., & Kurtz, S. M. (2020). 3D printed porous PEEK created via fused filament fabrication for osteoconductive orthopaedic surfaces. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 109, Article 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10385010.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103850 ↗

40. Kopperdahl, D. L., & Keaveny, T. M. (1998). Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 31(7), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00057-810.1016/S0021-9290(98)00057-8 ↗

41. Hou, F. J., Lang, S. M., Hoshaw, S. J., Reimann, D. A., & Fyhrie, D. P. (1998). Human vertebral body apparent and hard tissue stiffness. Journal of Biomechanics, 31(11), 1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00110-910.1016/S0021-9290(98)00110-9 ↗

42. Cendre, E., Mitton, D., Roux, J.-P., Arlot, M. E., Duboeuf, F., Burt-Pichat, B., Rumelhart, C., Peix, G., & Meunier, P. J. (1999). High-resolution computed tomography for architectural characterization of human lumbar cancellous bone: Relationships with histomorphometry and biomechanics. Osteoporosis International, 10(5), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198005024010.1007/s001980050240 ↗

43. Follet, H., Viguet-Carrin, S., Burt-Pichat, B., Dépalle, B., Bala, Y., Gineyts, E., Munoz, F., Arlot, M., Boivin, G., Chapurlat, R. D., Delmas, P. D., & Bouxsein, M. L. (2011). Effects of preexisting microdamage, collagen cross-links, degree of mineralization, age, and architecture on compressive mechanical properties of elderly human vertebral trabecular bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 29(4), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.2127510.1002/jor.21275 ↗

44. Hans, D., Wu, C., Njeh, C. F., Zhao, S., Augat, P., Newitt, D., Link, T., Lu, Y., Majumdar, S., & Genant, H. K. (1999). Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity. Calcified Tissue International, 64(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223990057210.1007/s002239900572 ↗

45. Augat, P., Link, T., Lang, T. F., Lin, J. C., Majumdar, S., & Genant, H. K. (1998). Anisotropy of the elastic modulus of trabecular bone specimens from different anatomical locations. Medical Engineering & Physics, 20(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00001-010.1016/S1350-4533(98)00001-0 ↗

46. Araya, M., Murillo, J., Vindas, R., & Guillén, T. (2024). Compressive behavior of SLA open-cell lattices: A comparison between triply periodic minimal surface gyroid and stochastic structures for artificial bone. Materialia, 38, Article 102233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2024.10223310.1016/j.mtla.2024.102233 ↗

47. Cao, Y., Lai, S., Wu, W., Sang, L., Lin, Y., Liu, T., Liang, C., Liu, W., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Design and mechanical evaluation of additively-manufactured graded TPMS lattices with biodegradable polymer composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 23, 2868–2880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.22110.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.221 ↗

48. Miralbes, R., Higuera,Saul, R., David,and, & Gomez, J. A. (2022). Comparative analysis of mechanical properties and energy absorption capabilities of functionally graded and non-graded thermoplastic sheet gyroid structures. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 29(26), 5142–5155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.194950910.1080/15376494.2021.1949509 ↗

49. Du, X., Ronayne, S., Lee, S. S., Hendry, J., Hoxworth, D., Bock, R., & Ferguson, S. J. (2023). 3D-printed PEEK/Silicon nitride scaffolds with a triply periodic minimal surface structure for spinal fusion implants. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 6(8), 3319–3329. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.3c0038310.1021/acsabm.3c00383 ↗

50. Liu, Z., Meyers, M. A., Zhang, Z., & Ritchie, R. O. (2017). Functional gradients and heterogeneities in biological materials: Design principles, functions, and bioinspired applications. Progress in Materials Science, 88, 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.01310.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.013 ↗

51. Mahamood, R. M., & Akinlabi, E. T. (2017). Introduction to Functionally Graded Materials. In R. M. Mahamood & E. T. Akinlabi (Eds.), Functionally Graded Materials (pp. 1–8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53756-6_110.1007/978-3-319-53756-6_1 ↗

52. Zhang, J., Chen, X., Sun, Y., Yang, J., Chen, R., Xiong, Y., Hou, W., & Bai, L. (2022). Design of a biomimetic graded TPMS scaffold with quantitatively adjustable pore size. Materials & Design, 218, Article 110665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11066510.1016/j.matdes.2022.110665 ↗

53. Rahman, O., Uddin, K. Z., Muthulingam, J., Youssef, G., Shen, C., & Koohbor, B. (2022). Density-graded cellular solids: Mechanics, fabrication, and applications. Advanced Engineering Materials, 24(1), Article 2100646. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20210064610.1002/adem.202100646 ↗

54. Thomas, J., Alsaleh, N. A., Ahmadein, M., Elfar, A. A., Farouk, H. A., & Essa, K. (2024). Graded cellular structures for enhanced performance of additively manufactured orthopaedic implants. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 130(3), 1887–1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12843-710.1007/s00170-023-12843-7 ↗

55. Tüzemen, M. Ç., Salamcı, E., & Ünal, R. (2022). Additive manufacturing design approach to strut-based functionally graded porous structures for personalized implants. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 84, 1526–1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.04510.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.045 ↗

56. Akbari, M., Mirabolghasemi, A., Bolhassani, M., Akbarzadeh, A., & Akbarzadeh, M. (2022). Strut-based cellular to shellular funicular materials. Advanced Functional Materials, 32(14), Article 2109725. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210972510.1002/adfm.202109725 ↗

57. Collins, M. N., Ren, G., Young, K., Pina, S., Reis, R. L., & Oliveira, J. M. (2021). Scaffold fabrication technologies and structure/function properties in bone tissue engineering. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(21), Article 2010609. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20201060910.1002/adfm.202010609 ↗

58. Erisken, C., Kalyon, D. M., & Wang, H. (2008). Functionally graded electrospun polycaprolactone and β-tricalcium phosphate nanocomposites for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials, 29(30), 4065–4073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.022 ↗

59. Han, C., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Wen, S., Wei, Q., Yan, C., Hao, L., Liu, J., & Shi, Y. (2018). Continuous functionally graded porous titanium scaffolds manufactured by selective laser melting for bone implants. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 80, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.01310.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.01.013 ↗

60. Cheloni, J. P. M., Zluhan, B., Silveira, M. E., Fonseca, E. B., Valim, D. B., & Lopes, E. S. N. (2025). Mechanical behavior and failure mode of body-centered cubic, gyroid, diamond, and Voronoi functionally graded additively manufactured biomedical lattice structures. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 163, Article 106796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.10679610.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106796 ↗

61. Karuna, C., Poltue, T., Khrueaduangkham, S., & Promoppatum, P. (2022). Mechanical and fluid characteristics of triply periodic minimal surface bone scaffolds under various functionally graded strategies. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 9(4), 1258–1278. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwac05210.1093/jcde/qwac052 ↗

62. Zhou, X., Jin, Y., & Du, J. (2020). Functionally graded scaffolds with programmable pore size distribution based on triply periodic minimal surface fabricated by selective laser melting. Materials, 13(21), Article 5046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1321504610.3390/ma13215046 ↗

63. Günther, F., Wagner, M., Pilz, S., Gebert, A., & Zimmermann, M. (2022). Design procedure for triply periodic minimal surface based biomimetic scaffolds. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 126, Article 104871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10487110.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104871 ↗

64. Shi, J., Yang, J., Zhu, L., Li, L., Li, Z., & Wang, X. (2018). A porous scaffold design method for bone tissue engineering using triply periodic minimal surfaces. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 6, 1015–1022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.277752110.1109/ACCESS.2017.2777521 ↗

65. Zhao, M., Li, Z., Chua, J. W., Lim, C. H., & Li, X. (2023). Enhanced energy-absorbing and sound-absorbing capability of functionally graded and helicoidal lattice structures with triply periodic minimal surfaces. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 30(10), 1973–1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-023-2684-810.1007/s12613-023-2684-8 ↗

66. Keaveny, T. M., & Hayes, W. C. (1993). A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 115(4B), 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.289553610.1115/1.2895536 ↗

67. Carter, D. R., & Hayes, W. C. (1977). The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 59(7), 954–962.

68. Nagaraja, S., Couse, T. L., & Guldberg, R. E. (2005). Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression. Journal of Biomechanics, 38(4), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.01310.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.013 ↗

69. Li, Q. M., Magkiriadis, I., & Harrigan, J. J. (2006). Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 42(5), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955X0606351910.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗

70. Sikder, P., Challa, B. T., & Gummadi, S. K. (2022). A comprehensive analysis on the processing-structure-property relationships of FDM-based 3-D printed polyetheretherketone (PEEK) structures. Materialia, 22, Article 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2022.10142710.1016/j.mtla.2022.101427 ↗

71. Yang, L., Ferrucci, M., Mertens, R., Dewulf, W., Yan, C., Shi, Y., & Yang, S. (2020). An investigation into the effect of gradients on the manufacturing fidelity of triply periodic minimal surface structures with graded density fabricated by selective laser melting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 275, Article 116367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11636710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116367 ↗

72. Gnanamani Sankaravel, S., Syed, R. B., & Manivachakan, V. (2022). In vitro and mechanical characterization of PLA/egg shell biocomposite scaffold manufactured using fused deposition modeling technology for tissue engineering applications. Polymer Composites, 43(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2636510.1002/pc.26365 ↗

73. Li, Y., Feng, Z., Hao, L., Huang, L., Xin, C., Wang, Y., Bilotti, E., Essa, K., Zhang, H., Li, Z., Yan, F., & Peijs, T. (2020). A review on functionally graded materials and structures via additive manufacturing: From multi-scale design to versatile functional properties. Advanced Materials Technologies, 5(6), Article 1900981. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20190098110.1002/admt.201900981 ↗

74. Lu, C., Zhang, Y., Aziz, M., Wen, P., Zhang, C., Shen, Q., & Chen, F. (2022). Mechanical behaviors of multidimensional gradient gyroid structures under static and dynamic loading: A numerical and experimental study. Additive Manufacturing, 59, Article 103187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.10318710.1016/j.addma.2022.103187 ↗

75. Zhang, H., Guo, Z., Zhang, Z., Wu, G., & Sang, L. (2023). Biomimetic design and fabrication of PEEK and PEEK/CF cage with minimal surface structures by fused filament fabrication. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 26, 5001–5015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.23610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.236 ↗

76. Kothandaraman, L., Balasubramanian, N. K., Palaniyappan, S., Dalaq, A. S., & Bodaghi, M. (2025). Material extrusion techniques for biomedical applications: Biomaterials and their performance – a review. Materials Today Communications, 49, Article 113707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11370710.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113707 ↗

77. Currey, J. D. (1984). The Mechanical Adaptations of Bones. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zvckf10.1515/9781400853724 ↗