Feedback Mechanism-driven Mutation Reptile Search Algorithm for Optimizing Interpolation Developable Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Frey, W., & Bindschadler, D. (1993). Computer aided design of a class of developable Bézier surfaces (p. 8057). General Motors R & D Publication.
2. Chu, C. H., Wang, C. C., & Tsai, C. R. (2008). Computer aided geometric design of strip using developable Bézier patches. Computers in Industry, 59(6), 601–611.10.1016/j.compind.2008.03.001 ↗
3. Hu, G., Wu, J. L., Li, H. N., & Hu, X. (2020). Shape optimization of generalized developable H-Bézier surfaces using adaptive cuckoo search algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 149, 102889.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102889 ↗
4. Aumann, G. (1991). Interpolation with developable Bézier patches. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 8(5), 409–420.10.1016/0167-8396(91)90014-3 ↗
5. Maekawa, T., & Chalfant, J. S. (1998). Design and tessellation of B-spline developable surfaces. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(3), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.282917310.1115/1.2829173 ↗
6. Aumann, G. (2003). A simple algorithm for designing developable Bézier surfaces. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 20(8), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2003.07.00110.1016/j.cagd.2003.07.001 ↗
7. Bodduluri, R., & Ravani, B. (1993). Design of developable surfaces using duality between plane and point geometries. Computer-Aided Design, 25(10), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(93)90017-I10.1016/0010-4485(93)90017-I ↗
8. Bodduluri, R., & Ravani, B. (1994). Geometric design and fabrication of developable Bézier and B-spline surfaces. Journal of Mechanical Design, 116(4), 1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.291948510.1115/1.2919485 ↗
9. Pottmann, H., & Wallner, J. (1999). Approximation algorithms for developable surfaces. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 16(6), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8396(99)00012-610.1016/S0167-8396(99)00012-6 ↗
10. Zhou, M., Yang, J. Q., Zheng, H. C., & Song, W. J. (2013). Design and shape adjustment of developable surfaces. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(6), 3789–3801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.05010.1016/j.apm.2012.07.050 ↗
11. Hu, G., Wu, J. L., & Qin, X. Q. (2018). A new approach in designing of local controlled developable H-Bézier surfaces. Advances in Engineering Software, 121, 26–38.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.003 ↗
12. Hu, G., Zhu, X. N., Wei, G., & Chang, C. T. (2021). An improved marine predators algorithm for shape optimization of developable ball surfaces. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 105, 104417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.10441710.1016/j.engappai.2021.104417 ↗
13. Maekawa, T., Wolter, F. E., & Patrikalakis, N. M. (1996). Umbilics and lines of curvature for shape interrogation. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 13(2), 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8396(95)00018-610.1016/0167-8396(95)00018-6 ↗
14. Patrikalakis, N. M., & Maekawa, T. (2002). Shape interrogation for computer aided design and manufacturing. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-04074-0 ↗
15. Zhang, X. P., Che, W. J., & Paul, J. C. (2009). Computing lines of curvature for implicit surfaces. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 26(9), 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2009.07.00410.1016/j.cagd.2009.07.004 ↗
16. Li, C. Y., Wang, R. H., & Zhu, C. G. (2011). Parametric representation of a surface pencil with a common line of curvature. Computer-Aided Design, 43(9), 1110–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2011.05.00110.1016/j.cad.2011.05.001 ↗
17. Li, C. Y., Wang, R. H., & Zhu, C. G. (2013). An approach for designing a developable surface through a given line of curvature. Computer-Aided Design, 45(3), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.11.00110.1016/j.cad.2012.11.001 ↗
18. Hu, G., Wu, J. L., & Wang, X. F. (2021). Constructing local controlled developable H-Bézier surfaces by interpolating characteristic curves. Computational and Applied Mathematic, 40(6), 216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01587-310.1007/s40314-021-01587-3 ↗
19. Terzopoulos, D., Platt, J., Barr, A., & Fleischer, K. (1987). Elastically deformable models. Acm Siggraph Computer Graphics, 21(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/37401.3742710.1145/37401.37427 ↗
20. Celniker, G., & Gossard, D. (1991). Deformable curve and surface finite-elements for free-form shape design. Acm Siggraph Computer Graphics, 25(4), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1145/127719.12274610.1145/127719.122746 ↗
21. Hu, S. M., Li, Y. F., Ju, T., & Zhu, X. (2001). Modifying the shape of NURBS surfaces with geometric constraints. Computer-Aided Design, 33(12), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00115-910.1016/S0010-4485(00)00115-9 ↗
22. Li, J. C., Yan, L. L., & Liu, C. Z. (2017). Quintic composite spline with adjustable shape and parameter selection. Journal of Image and Graphics, 22(02), 197–204. (in Chinese).
23. Liu, X. (2015). Filling n-sided holes with trimmed b-spline surfaces based on energy-minimization method. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 15(1), 011001.10.1115/1.4028632 ↗
24. Wang, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Chaotic multi-swarm whale optimizer boosted support vector machine for medical diagnosis. Applied Soft Computing, 88, 105946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.10594610.1016/j.asoc.2019.105946 ↗
25. Nautiyal, B., Prakash, R., Vimal, V., Liang, G., & Chen, H. (2021). Improved salp swarm algorithm with mutation schemes for solving global optimization and engineering problems. Engineering with Computers, 4, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01252-z10.1007/s00366-020-01252-z ↗
26. Hu, G., Du, B., Wang, X. F., & Wei, G. (2022). An enhanced black widow optimization algorithm for feature selection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 235, 107638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.10763810.1016/j.knosys.2021.107638 ↗
27. Holland, J. H. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267(1), 66–73.10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66 ↗
28. Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-Pour, H., & Saryazdi, S. (2009). GSA: A gravitational search algorithm. Information Sciences, 179(13), 2232–2248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.00410.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004 ↗
29. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Hatamlou, A. (2015). Multi-verse optimizer: A nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(2), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1870-710.1007/s00521-015-1870-7 ↗
30. Faramarzi, A., Heidarinejad, M., Stephens, B. E., & Mirjalili, S. (2020). Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 191, 105190.10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190 ↗
31. Rao, R. V., Savsani, V. J., & Vakharia, D. P. (2012). Teaching-learning-based optimization: An optimization method for continuous non-linear large scale problems. Information Sciences: An International Journal, 183(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.08.00610.1016/j.ins.2011.08.006 ↗
32. Moghdani, R., & Salimifard, K. (2018). Volleyball premier league algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 64, 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.11.04310.1016/j.asoc.2017.11.043 ↗
33. Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of The IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, 4(8), 1942–1948.
34. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., & Colorni, A. (1996). Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 26(1), 29–41.10.1109/3477.484436 ↗
35. Yang, X. S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2012). Bat algorithm: A novel approach for global engineering optimization. Engineering Computations: International Journal for Computer-Aided Engineering and Software, 29(5), 464–483.10.1108/02644401211235834 ↗
36. Gandomi, A. H., Yang, X., & Alavi, A. H. (2013). Cuckoo search algorithm: A metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 29(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-011-0241-y10.1007/s00366-011-0241-y ↗
37. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.00710.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
38. Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2016). The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 95, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.00810.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
39. Mirjalili, S., Gandomi, A. H., Mirjalili, S. Z., Saremi, S., Faris, H., & Mirjalili, S. M. (2017). Salp swarm algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Advances in Engineering Software, 114, 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.00210.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.002 ↗
40. Heidari, A. A., Mirjalili, S., Faris, H., Aljarah, I., Mafarja, M., & Chen, H. (2019). Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 849–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.02810.1016/j.future.2019.02.028 ↗
41. Abualigah, L., Elaziz, M. A., Sumari, P., Geem, Z. W., & Gandomi, A. H. (2022). Reptile search algorithm : A nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimizer. Expert Systems with Applications, 191(11), 116158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11615810.1016/j.eswa.2021.116158 ↗
42. Li, S. M., Chen, H. L., Wang, M. J., Heidari, A. A., & Mirjalili, S. (2020). Slime mould algorithm: A new method for stochastic optimization. Future Generation Computer Systems, 111, 300–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.03.05510.1016/j.future.2020.03.055 ↗
43. Braik, M. S. (2021). Chameleon swarm algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for solving engineering design problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 174(1), 114685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11468510.1016/j.eswa.2021.114685 ↗
44. Naruei, I., & Keynia, F. (2021). Wild horse optimizer: a new meta-heuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering with Computers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01438-z10.1007/s00366-021-01438-z ↗
45. Abualigah, L., Yousri, D., Elaziz, M. A., Ewees, A. A., Al-qaness, M. A. A., & Gandomi, A. (2021). Matlab code of aquila optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 157, 107250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.10725010.1016/j.cie.2021.107250 ↗
46. Dhiman, G., Garg, M., Nagar, A., Kumar, V., & Dehghani, M. (2021). A novel algorithm for global optimization: rat swarm optimizer. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 8457–8482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02580-010.1007/s12652-020-02580-0 ↗
47. Hu, G., Wang, J., Li, M., Hussien, A. G., & Abbas, M. (2023). EJS: Multi-strategy enhanced jellyfish search algorithm for engineering applications. Mathematics, 11(4), 851. https://doi.org/10.3390/math1104085110.3390/math11040851 ↗
48. Mirjalili, S. (2016). SCA: A sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 96, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.02210.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022 ↗
49. Sulaiman, M. H., Mustaffa, Z., Saari, M. M., & Daniyal, H. (2020). Barnacles mating optimizer: A new bio-inspired algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87, 103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.10333010.1016/j.engappai.2019.103330 ↗
50. Houssein, H. E., Saad, M. R., Hashim, F. A., Shaban, H., & Hassaballah, M. (2020). Lévy flight distribution: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 94, 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.10373110.1016/j.engappai.2020.103731 ↗
51. Hashim, F. A., Hussain, K., Houssein, E. H., Mai, S. M., & Al-Atabany, W. (2021). Archimedes optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Applied Intelligence, 51(3), 1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01893-z10.1007/s10489-020-01893-z ↗
52. Kaur, S., Awasthi, L. K., Sangal, A. L., & Dhiman, G. (2020). Tunicate swarm algorithm: A new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 90, 103541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.10354110.1016/j.engappai.2020.103541 ↗
53. Yang, Y. T., Chen, H. L., Heidari, A. A., & Gandomi, A. H. (2021). Hunger games search: Visions, conception, implementation, deep analysis, perspectives, and towards performance shifts. Expert Systems with Applications, 177, 114864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11486410.1016/j.eswa.2021.114864 ↗
54. Hashim, F. A., Houssein, E. H., Hussain, K., Mabrouk, M. S., & Al-Atabany, W. (2022). Honey badger algorithm: New metaheuristic algorithm for solving optimization problems. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), 192, 84–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.01310.1016/j.matcom.2021.08.013 ↗
55. Ezugwu, A. E., Agushaka, J. O., Abualigah, L., Mirjalili, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2022). Prairie dog optimization algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(22), 20017–20065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07530-910.1007/s00521-022-07530-9 ↗
56. Agushaka, J. O., Ezugwu, A. E., & Abualigah, L. (2022). Dwarf mongoose optimization algorithm. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 391, 114570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11457010.1016/j.cma.2022.114570 ↗
57. Oyelade, O. N., Ezugwu, A. E. S., Mohamed, T. I. A., & Abualigah, L. (2022). Ebola optimization search algorithm: a new nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm. IEEE Access, 10, 16150–16177.10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3147821 ↗
58. Shinawi, A. E., Ibrahim, R. A., Abualigah, L., Zelenakova, M., & Abd Elaziz, M. (2021). Enhanced adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system using reptile search algorithm for relating swelling potentiality using index geotechnical properties: A case study at El Sherouk City. Mathematics, 9(24), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/math924329510.3390/math9243295 ↗
59. Almotairi, K. H., & Abualigah, L. (2022). Hybrid reptile search algorithm and remora optimization algorithm for optimization tasks and data clustering. Symmetry, 14(3), 458.10.3390/sym14030458 ↗
60. Al-Shourbaji, I., Helian, N., Sun, Y., Alshathri, S., & Abd Elaziz, M. (2022). Boosting ant colony optimization with reptile search algorithm for churn prediction. Mathematics, 10(7), 1031.10.3390/math10071031 ↗
61. Almotairi, K. H., & Abualigah, L. (2022). Improved reptile search algorithm with novel mean transition mechanism for constrained industrial engineering problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(20), 17257–17277.10.1007/s00521-022-07369-0 ↗
62. Emam, M. M., Houssein, E. H., & Ghoniem, R. M. (2022). A modified reptile search algorithm for global optimization and image segmentation: Case study brain MRI images. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 152, 106404.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106404 ↗
63. Abualigah, L., & Diabat, A. (2022). Chaotic binary reptile search algorithm and its feature selection applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2022, 1–17.
64. Huang, L., Wang, Y., Guo, Y., & Hu, G. (2022). An improved reptile search algorithm based on lévy flight and interactive crossover strategy to engineering application. Mathematics, 10(13), 2329.10.3390/math10132329 ↗
65. Wang, G. G., Guo, L. H., Gandomi, A. H., Hao, G. S., & Wang, H. (2014). Chaotic krill herd algorithm. Information Sciences, 274, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.12310.1016/j.ins.2014.02.123 ↗
66. Ewees, A. A., & Elaziz, M. A. (2020). Performance analysis of chaotic multi-verse harris hawks optimization: a case study on solving engineering problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 88, 103370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.10337010.1016/j.engappai.2019.103370 ↗
67. Li, C. Y., Li, J., Chen, H. L., & Heidari, A. A. (2021). Memetic harris hawks optimization: Developments and perspectives on project scheduling and QoS-aware web service composition. Expert Systems with Applications, 171, 114529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.11452910.1016/j.eswa.2020.114529 ↗
68. Rather, S., & Bala, P. (2020). Swarm-based chaotic gravitational search algorithm for solving mechanical engineering design problems. World Journal of Engineering, 17(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE−09-2019-025410.1108/WJE−09-2019-0254 ↗
69. Jing, K., Zhao, X. G., Zhang, X. Y., & Liu, D. (2018). Ant lion optimizer with levy variation and adaptive elite competition mechanism. CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 13(2), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.11992/tis.20170609110.11992/tis.201706091 ↗
70. Coelho, L. (2010). Gaussian quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization approaches for constrained engineering design problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1676–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.04410.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.044 ↗
71. Gupta, S., & Deep, K. (2019). Improved sine cosine algorithm with crossover scheme for global optimization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 165, 374–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.00810.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.008 ↗
72. Wu, X. L., Hu, S., & Cheng, W. (2021). Multi-objective signal timing optimization based on improved whale optimization algorithm. Journal of kunming university of science and technology (Natural science), 46(1), 134–141. (in Chinese).
73. Mirjalili, S. (2015). Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.00610.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006 ↗
74. Ahmadianfar, I., Bozorg-Haddad, O., & Chu, X. (2020). Gradient-based optimizer: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Information Sciences, 540, 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.06.03710.1016/j.ins.2020.06.037 ↗
75. Youn, B. D., Choi, K. K., Yang, R. J., & Gu, L. (2004). Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26(3–4), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0345-010.1007/s00158-003-0345-0 ↗
76. Hu, G., Zhong, J. Y., & Wei, G. (2023). SaCHBA_PDN: Modified honey badger algorithm with multi-strategy for UAV path planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 223, 223119941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.11994110.1016/j.eswa.2023.119941 ↗
77. Hu, G., Zhong, J. Y., Wei, G., & Chang, C. T. (2023). DTCSMO: An efficient hybrid starling murmuration optimizer for engineering applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 405, 115878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.11587810.1016/j.cma.2023.115878 ↗
78. Hu, G., Yang, R., Qin, X. Q., & Wei, G. (2023). MCSA: Multi-strategy boosted chameleon-inspired optimization algorithm for engineering applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 403, 115676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11567610.1016/j.cma.2022.115676 ↗