journal article·2009-06

Aerodynamic Characteristics, Power Requirements and Camber Effects of the Pitching-Down Flapping Hovering

Peng Bai, Er-jie Cui, Hui-ling Zhan

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 6· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The pitching-down flapping is a new type of bionic flapping, which was invented by the author based on previous studies on the aerodynamic mechanisms of fruit fly (pitching-up) flapping. The motivation of this invention is to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of flapping Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs). In this paper the pitching-down flapping is briefly introduced. The major works include: (1) Computing the power requirements of pitching-down flapping in three modes (advanced, symmetrical, delayed), which were compared with those of pitching-up flapping; (2) Investigating the effects of translational acceleration time, Δτ t , and rotational time, Δτ r , at the end of a stroke, and the angle of attack, α, in the middle of a stroke on the aerodynamic characteristics in symmetrical mode; (3) Investigating the effect of camber on pitching-down flapping. From the above works, conclusions can be drawn that: (1) Compared with the pitching-up flapping, the pitching-down flapping can greatly reduce the time-averaged power requirements; (2) The increase in Δτ t and the decrease in Δτ r can increase both the lift and drag coefficients, but the time-averaged ratio of lift to drag changes a little. And α has significant effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of the pitching-down flapping; (3) The positive camber can effectively increase the lift coefficient and the ratio of lift to drag.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems · Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Burton R. Bird Flight, Facts On File, New York, USA, 1990.
2. Theodorsen T. General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter, NACA Technical Report 496, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1935.
3. Osborne MF M. Aerodynamics of flapping flight with application to insects. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1951, 28, 221–245.10.1242/jeb.28.2.221 ↗
4. Dickinson M H, Gotz K G. Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1993, 174, 45–64.10.1242/jeb.174.1.45 ↗
5. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 ↗
6. Ellington C P, Van den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.10.1038/384626a0 ↗
7. Sun M, Tang J. Unsteady, aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 55–70.10.1242/jeb.205.1.55 ↗
8. Ramamurti R, Sandberg W C. A three-dimensional computational study of the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 1507–1518.10.1242/jeb.205.10.1507 ↗
9. Bai P, Cui E J, Li F, Zhou W J. Study of high aerodynamic lift mechanics of hovering insect flapping wing at low Reynolds number. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2007, 25, 175–182. (in Chinese)
10. Bai P, Cui E J, Li F, Zhou W J, Chen B Y. A new bionic MAV’s flapping motion based on fruit fly hovering at low Reynolds number. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2007, 23, 485–493.10.1007/s10409-007-0102-5 ↗
11. Rogers S E, Kwak D. An upwind differencing scheme for the incompressible navier-stokes equations. Applied Numerieal Mathematics, 1991, 8, 43–64.10.1016/0168-9274(91)90097-J ↗
12. Torkel W F. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanism for lift production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1973, 59, 169–230.10.1242/jeb.59.1.169 ↗
13. Vogel S. Flight in Drosophila: II. Variations in stroke parameters and wing contour. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1967, 46, 383–392.10.1242/jeb.46.2.383 ↗
14. Sun M, Tang J. Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 2413–2427.10.1242/jeb.205.16.2413 ↗
15. Abbott I H, von Doenhoff A E. Theory of Wing Sections, Dover Publications, New York, USA, 1958.