DataVXJournal of Bionic EngineeringPaper
journal article·2024-01

A Comparison of Four Neural Networks Algorithms on Locomotion Intention Recognition of Lower Limb Exoskeleton Based on Multi-source Information

Duojin Wang, Xiaoping Gu, Hongliu Yu

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 21· Issue 1
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Mooney, L. M., Rouse, E. J., & Herr, H. M. (2014). Autonomous exoskeleton reduces metabolic cost of human walking during load carriage. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 11, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-8010.1186/1743-0003-11-80 ↗
2. Yang, J. T., Sun, T. R., Cheng, L., & Hou, Z. G. (2022). Spatial repetitive impedance learning control for robot-assisted rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 28, 1280–1290. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2022.322193110.1109/TMECH.2022.3221931 ↗
3. Mokhtari, M., Taghizadeh, M., & Mazare, M. (2021). Impedance control based on optimal adaptive high order super twisting sliding mode for a 7-DOF lower limb exoskeleton. Meccanica, 56, 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01308-410.1007/s11012-021-01308-4 ↗
4. Zhong, B. X., Da Silva, R. L., Li, M., Huang, H., & Lobaton, E. (2020). Environmental context prediction for lower limb prostheses with uncertainty quantification. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 18, 458–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2020.299339910.1109/TASE.2020.2993399 ↗
5. Tucker, M. R., Olivier, J., Pagel, A., Bleuler, H., Bouri, M., Lambercy, O., Millán, J. D. R., Riener, R., Vallery, H., & Gassert, R. (2015). Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 12, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-12-110.1186/1743-0003-12-1 ↗
6. Young, A. J., & Ferris, D. P. (2016). State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 25, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.252116010.1109/TNSRE.2016.2521160 ↗
7. Mokhtari, M., Taghizadeh, M., & Mazare, M. (2021). Hybrid adaptive robust control based on CPG and ZMP for a lower limb exoskeleton. Robotica, 39, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026357472000026010.1017/S0263574720000260 ↗
8. Hu, B., Rouse, E., & Hargrove, L. (2018). Fusion of bilateral lower-limb neuromechanical signals improves prediction of locomotor activities. Front Robot AI, 5, 78. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.0007810.3389/frobt.2018.00078 ↗
9. Huang, H., Zhang, F., Hargrove, L. J., Dou, Z., Rogers, D. R., & Englehart, K. B. (2011). Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular–mechanical fusion. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58, 2867–2875. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.216167110.1109/TBME.2011.2161671 ↗
10. Laschowski, B., McNally, W., Wong, A., & McPhee, J. (2022). Environment classification for robotic leg prostheses and exoskeletons using deep convolutional neural networks. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 15, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.73096510.3389/fnbot.2021.730965 ↗
11. Kurbis, A. G., Laschowski, B., & Mihailidis, A. (2022). Stair recognition for robotic exoskeleton control using computer vision and deep learning. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2022, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR55369.2022.989650110.1109/ICORR55369.2022.9896501 ↗
12. Kemaev, I., Polykovskiy, D., & Vetrov, D. (2018). Reset: learning recurrent dynamic routing in resnet-like neural networks. The 10th Asian Conference on Machine Learning, Beijing, China, 95, 422–437. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.0438010.48550/arXiv.1811.04380 ↗
13. Wang, M., Wu, X. Y., Liu, D. X., & Wang, C. (2016). A human motion prediction algorithm based on HSMM for SIAT's exoskeleton. The 35th Chinese Control Conference, Chengdu, China, 3891–3896. https://doi.org/10.1109/ChiCC.2016.755395910.1109/ChiCC.2016.7553959 ↗
14. Patzer, I., & Asfour, T. (2019). Minimal sensor setup in lower limb exoskeletons for motion classification based on multi-modal sensor data. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Macau, China, 8164–8170. https://doi.org/10.1109/Humanoids43949.2019.903501410.1109/Humanoids43949.2019.9035014 ↗
15. Wu, X. Y., Yuan, Y., Zhang, X. K., Wang, C., Xu, T. T., & Tao, D. C. (2022). Gait phase classification for a lower limb exoskeleton system based on a graph convolutional network model. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 69, 4999–5008. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2021.308206710.1109/tie.2021.3082067 ↗
16. Ren, B., Zhang, Z. Q., Zhang, C., & Chen, S. L. (2022). Motion trajectories prediction of lower limb exoskeleton based on long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Actuators, 11, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/act1103007310.3390/act11030073 ↗
17. Chen, C. F., Du, Z. J., He, L., Shi, Y. J., Wang, J. Q., & Dong, W. (2021). A novel gait pattern recognition method based on LSTM-CNN for lower limb exoskeleton. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 18, 1059–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-00083-y10.1007/s42235-021-00083-y ↗
18. Su, B. B., & Gutierrez-Farewik, E. M. (2020). Gait trajectory and gait phase prediction based on an LSTM network. Sensors, 20, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2024712710.3390/s20247127 ↗
19. Li, J. X., Gao, T., Zhang, Z. H., Wu, G. H., Zhang, H., Zheng, J. B., Gao, Y. F., & Wang, Y. (2022). A novel method of pattern recognition based on TLSTM in lower limb exoskeleton in many terrains. The 4th International Conference on Intelligent Control, Measurement and Signal Processing, Hangzhou, China, 733–737. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSP55950.2022.985900510.1109/ICMSP55950.2022.9859005 ↗
20. Zhu, M., Guan, X. R., Li, Z., He, L., Wang, Z., & Cai, K. S. (2023). sEMG-based lower limb motion prediction using CNN-LSTM with improved PCA optimization algorithm. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 20, 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00280-310.1007/s42235-022-00280-3 ↗
21. Lu, Y. Z., Wang, H., Zhou, B., Wei, C. F., & Xu, S. Q. (2022). Continuous and simultaneous estimation of lower limb multi-joint angles from sEMG signals based on stacked convolutional and LSTM models. Expert Systems with Applications, 203, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.11734010.1016/j.eswa.2022.117340 ↗
22. Guo, C. Y., Song, Q. Z., & Liu, Y. L. (2022). Research on the application of multi-source information fusion in multiple gait pattern transition recognition. Sensors (Basel), 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2221855110.3390/s22218551 ↗
23. Zhang, X. D., Li, H. Z., Dong, R. L., Lu, Z. F., & Li, C. X. (2022). Electroencephalogram and surface electromyogram fusion-based precise detection of lower limb voluntary movement using convolution neural network-long short-term memory model. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.95438710.3389/fnins.2022.954387 ↗
24. Zhang, K. E., Wang, J., De Silva, C. W., & Fu, C. L. (2020). Unsupervised cross-subject adaptation for predicting human locomotion intent. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28, 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.296674910.1109/TNSRE.2020.2966749 ↗
25. Kuniaki Saito, Watanabe, K., Ushiku, Y., & Harada, T. (2018). Maximum classifier discrepancy for unsupervised domain adaptation. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 3723–3732. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.0039210.1109/CVPR.2018.00392 ↗
26. Zhang, K. E., Xiong, C. H., Zhang, W., Liu, H. Y., Lai, D. Y., Rong, Y. M., & Fu, C. L. (2019). Environmental features recognition for lower limb prostheses toward predictive walking. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 27, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.289522110.1109/TNSRE.2019.2895221 ↗
27. Hur, T., Bang, J., Huynh-The, T., Lee, J. W., Kim, J. I., & Lee, S. Y. (2018). Iss2Image: A novel signal-encoding technique for CNN-based human activity recognition. Sensors (Basel), 18, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1811391010.3390/s18113910 ↗
28. Khatun, M., Yousuf, M., Ahmed, S., Uddin, M. Z., Alyami, S., Al-Ashhab, S., Akhdar, H., Khan, A., Azad, A. K. M., & Moni, M. A. (2022). Deep CNN-LSTM with self-attention model for human activity recognition using wearable sensor. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 10, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2022.317771010.1109/JTEHM.2022.3177710 ↗
29. Zhao, J. F., Mao, X., & Chen, L. J. (2018). Learning deep features to recognise speech emotion using merged deep CNN. IET Signal Processing, 12, 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-spr.2017.032010.1049/iet-spr.2017.0320 ↗
30. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9, 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.173510.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
31. Zhou, X., Wu, X. T., Ding, P., Li, X. G., He, N. H., Zhang, G. Z., & Zhang, X. X. (2019). Research on transformer partial discharge UHF pattern recognition based on CNN-LSTM. Energies, 13, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1301006110.3390/en13010061 ↗
32. He, K. M., Zhang, X. Y., Ren, S. Q., & Sun, J., (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
33. Liu, T. L., Luo, R. H., Xu, L. Q., Feng, D. C., Cao, L., Liu, S. Y., & Guo, J. J. (2022). Spatial channel attention for deep convolutional neural networks. Mathematics, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/math1010175010.3390/math10101750 ↗
34. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.Y., & Kweon, I. S. (2018). CBAM: Convolutional block attention module. The 15th European Conference on Computer Vision, Munich, Germany, 11211, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_110.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗
35. Zhang, H., Wu, C. R., Zhang, Z. Y., Zhu, Y., Lin, H. B., Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., He, T., Mueller, J., & Manmatha, R. (2022). Resnest: Split-attention networks. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2736–2746. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.0030910.1109/CVPRW56347.2022.00309 ↗
36. Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018). Squeeze-and-excitation networks. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, 7132–7141. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.0074510.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
37. Pinto-Fernandez, D., Torricelli, D., del Carmen Sanchez-Villamanan, M., Aller, F., Mombaur, K., Conti, R., Vitiello, N., Moreno, J. C., & Pons, J. L. (2020). Performance evaluation of lower limb exoskeletons: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28, 1573–1583. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.298948110.1109/TNSRE.2020.2989481 ↗
38. Wan, S. H., Qi, L. Y., Xu, X. L., Tong, C., & Gu, Z. H. (2020). Deep learning models for real-time human activity recognition with smartphones. Mobile Networks and Applications, 25, 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01445-x10.1007/s11036-019-01445-x ↗
39. Reyes-Ortiz, J. L., Oneto, L., Samà, A., Parra, X., & Anguita, D. (2016). Transition-aware human activity recognition using smartphones. Neurocomputing, 171, 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.08510.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.085 ↗
40. Reiss, A., & Stricker, D. (2012). Introducing a new benchmarked dataset for activity monitoring. The 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Newcastle, England, 108–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2012.1310.1109/ISWC.2012.13 ↗
41. Xia, K., Huang, J. G., & Wang, H. Y. (2020). LSTM-CNN architecture for human activity recognition. IEEE Access, 8, 56855–56866. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298222510.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982225 ↗
42. Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., & Moore, S. A. (2011). Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter, 12, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/1964897.196491810.1145/1964897.1964918 ↗
43. Roggen, D., Calatroni, A., Rossi, M., Holleczek, T., Förster, K., Tröster, G., Lukowicz, P., Bannach, D., Pirkl, G., & Ferscha, A. (2010). Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments. The 7th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems, Kassel, Germany, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1109/INSS.2010.557346210.1109/INSS.2010.5573462 ↗
44. Zhong, B. X., Silva, R. L. D., Tran, M., Huang, H., & Lobaton, E. (2022). Efficient environmental context prediction for lower limb prostheses. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52, 3980–3994. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2021.308403610.1109/TSMC.2021.3084036 ↗
45. Zhang, L. L., Xie, Y. X., Xidao, L., & Zhang, X. (2018). Multi-source heterogeneous data fusion. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Chengdu, China, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD.2018.839616510.1109/ICAIBD.2018.8396165 ↗
46. Jiang, M. M., Wu, Q., & Li, X. T. (2022). Multisource heterogeneous data fusion analysis of regional digital construction based on machine learning. Journal of Sensors, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/820592910.1155/2022/8205929 ↗
47. Zhang, F., Yang, J., Sun, C., Guo, X., & Wan, T. T. (2021). Research on multi-source heterogeneous data fusion technology of new energy vehicles under the new four modernizations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1865, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1865/2/02203410.1088/1742-6596/1865/2/022034 ↗