Aerodynamic effects of corrugation in flapping insect wings in forward flight
Source abstract
Abstract
We have examined the aerodynamic effects of corrugation in model wings that closely mimic the wing movements of a forward flight bumblebee using the method of computational fluid dynamics. Various corrugated wing models were tested (care was taken to ensure that the corrugation introduced zero camber). Advance ratio ranging from 0 to 0.57 was considered. The results shown that at all flight speeds considered, the time courses of aerodynamic force of the corrugated wing are very close to those of the flat-plate wing. The corrugation decreases aerodynamic force slightly. The changes in the mean location of center of pressure in the spanwise and chordwise directions resulting from the corrugation are no more than 3% of the wing chord length. The possible reason for the small aerodynamic effects of wing corrugation is that the wing operates at a large angle of attack and the flow is separated: the large angle of incidence dominates the corrugation in determining the flow around the wing, and for separated flow, the flow is much less sensitive to wing shape variation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Physiological and biochemical adaptations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Dudley R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2000.10.1515/9780691186344 ↗
2. Rees C J C. Form and function in corrugated insect wings. Nature, 1975, 256, 200–203.10.1038/256200a0 ↗
3. Newman D J S, Wootton R J. An approach to the mechanics of pleating in dragonfly wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1986, 125, 361–372.10.1242/jeb.125.1.361 ↗
4. Ennos A R. The importance of torsion in the design of insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1988, 140, 137–160.10.1242/jeb.140.1.137 ↗
5. Ellington C P, van Den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-Edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.10.1038/384626a0 ↗
6. Dickinson M H, Lehman F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 ↗
7. Sane S P, Dickinson M H. The control of flight force a flapping wing: Lift and drag production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 2607–2626.10.1242/jeb.204.15.2607 ↗
8. Usherwood J R, Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of revolving wings. I. Model hawkmoth wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 1547–1564.10.1242/jeb.205.11.1547 ↗
9. Liu H, Ellington C P, Kawachi K, van Den Berg C, Willmott A P. A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1998, 201, 461–477.10.1242/jeb.201.4.461 ↗
10. Sun M, Tang J. Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, 55–70.10.1242/jeb.205.1.55 ↗
11. Wang Z J, Birch J M, Dickinson M H. Unsteady forces and flows in flow Reynolds number hovering flight: Two-Dimensional computational vs robotic wing experiments. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 269–283.10.1242/jeb.00744 ↗
12. Rees C J C. Aerodynamic properties of an insect wing section and a smooth aerofoil compared. Nature, 1975, 258, 141–142.10.1038/258141a0 ↗
13. Kesel A B. Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203, 3125–3135.10.1242/jeb.203.20.3125 ↗
14. Vargas A, Mittal R, Dong H. A computational study of the aerodynamic performance of a dragonfly wing section in gliding flight. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2008, 3, 026004.10.1088/1748-3182/3/2/026004 ↗
15. Meng X G, Xu L, Sun M. Aerodynamic effects of corrugation in flapping insect wings in hovering flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2011, 214, 432–444.10.1242/jeb.046375 ↗
16. Dudley R, Ellington C P. Mechanics of forward flight in bumblebees. I. Kinematics and morphology. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1990, 148, 19–52.10.1242/jeb.148.1.19 ↗
17. Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. III. Kinematics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 1984, 305, 41–78.10.1098/rstb.1984.0051 ↗
18. Sun M, Yu X. Aerodynamic force generation in hovering flight in a tiny insect. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44, 1532–1540.10.2514/1.17356 ↗
19. Rogers S E, Kwak D. Upwind Differencing scheme for the time-accurate incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28, 253–262.10.2514/3.10382 ↗
20. Rogers S E, Kwak D, Kiris C. Steady and unsteady solutions of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, 1991, 29, 603–610.10.2514/3.10627 ↗
21. Hilgenstock A. A fast method for the elliptic generation of three dimensional grids with full boundary control. In: Sengupta S, Hauser J, Eiseman P R, Thompson J F (eds). Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Fluid Mechanics ′88, Pineridge Press, Swansea, UK, 1988, 137–146.
22. Sun M, Wu J H. Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 3065–3083.10.1242/jeb.00517 ↗
23. Wu J H, Sun M. Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 1137–1150.10.1242/jeb.00868 ↗
24. Wu J C. Theory for aerodynamic force and moment in viscous flows. AIAA Journal, 1981, 19, 432–441.10.2514/3.50966 ↗
25. Willmott A P, Ellington C P. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1997, 200, 2705–2722.10.1242/jeb.200.21.2705 ↗