journal article·2019-03

Motion Characteristics of the Appendages of Mole Crickets during Burrowing

Yan Zhang, Jiafeng Cao, Qi Wang, Pengfei Wang, Yueying Zhu, Junxia Zhang

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 16· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Mole crickets, Gryllotalpa orientalis, have a pair of fully specialized forelegs for burrowing and employ an efficient underground excavating pattern, which provides excellent biological example for design of bionic underground excavation equipment. In this study, the excavating pattern and kinematic features of mole crickets were obtained by using high-speed motion capture system and employing a transparent hydrogel as the analogue for soil. The two-dimensional motion characteristics of the forelegs of mole crickets during burrowing were captured and analyzed. The results show that the forelegs of the mole cricket employ a unique excavating pattern, which consists of foreword digging and horizontal expansion. We label this pattern a digging-expanding mode. An excavating cycle includes the digging and expanding motion of the forelegs, rotation caused by the midlegs and hindlegs, and forward thrust by the hindlegs. The excavating motion of the left and right forelegs is alternately carried out. This study can inspire the design of bionic tunnelling mechanisms and underground excavation equipment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Fossil Insects in Amber

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Endo C. The underground life of the oriental mole cricket: An analysis of burrow morphology. Journal of Zoology, 2007, 273, 414–420.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00345.x ↗
2. Bailey D L, Held D W, Kalra A, Twarakavi N, Arriaga F. Biopores from mole crickets (Scapteriscus, spp.) increase soil hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rates. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 94, 7–14.10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.04.011 ↗
3. Zhang Y, Huang H, Liu X, Ren L Q. Kinematics of terrestrial locomotion in mole cricket Gryllotalpa orientalis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2011, 8, 151–157.10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60013-9 ↗
4. Zhang Y, Zhang J X, Ren L Q. The terrestrial locomotion of a mole cricket with foreleg amputation. Science China E, 2015, 58, 999–1006.10.1007/s11431-015-5823-2 ↗
5. Quillin K J. Ontogenetic scaling of burrowing forces in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203, 2757–2770.10.1242/jeb.203.18.2757 ↗
6. Stroud J. An Introduction to Earthworms, [2018-12-13], https://doi.org/cereals.ahdb.org.uk/media/912602/ch2-an-introduction-to-earthworms-cereals-2016-handout-.pdf
7. Manton S M. The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms — Part 2. General introduction to the locomotory mechanisms of the arthropoda. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 42, 93–117.10.1111/j.1096-3642.1952.tb01854.x ↗
8. Maladen R D, Ding Y, Li C, Goldman D I. Undulatory swimming in sand: Subsurface locomotion of the Sandfish lizard. Science, 2009, 325, 314–317.10.1126/science.1172490 ↗
9. Maladen R D, Ding Y, Umbanhowar P B, Kamor A, Goldman D I. Mechanical models of sandfish locomotion reveal principles of high performance subsurface sand-swimming. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2011, 8, 1332.10.1098/rsif.2010.0678 ↗
10. Thomas H G, Bateman P W, Scantlebury M, Bennett N C. Seasonal effects on digging activity and burrow architecture in the Cape dune mole-rat, Bathyergus suillus (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). Zoologica Africana, 2012, 47, 332–340.10.3377/004.047.0222 ↗
11. Davies K C, Jarvis J U M. The burrow systems and burrowing dynamics of the mole-rats Bathyergus suillus and Cryptomys hottentotus in the fynbos of the south-western Cape, South Africa. Journal of Zoology, 2015, 209, 125–147.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1986.tb03570.x ↗
12. Kluever B. How Fast can a Mole Travel, [2018-12-13], https://doi.org/www.youaskandy.com/questions-answers/25-article-series-1950/15827-how-fast-can-a-mole-travel.html
13. Scott R G, Richardson R C. Realities of biologically inspired design with a subterranean digging robot example. Proceedings of the 6th IASTED International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 2007.
14. Ji W F, Chen D H, Jia H L, Tong J. Experimental investigation into soil-cutting performance of the claws of mole rat (Scaptochirus moschatus). Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S166–S171.10.1016/S1672-6529(09)60231-6 ↗
15. Espinoza D N, Santamarina J C. Ant tunneling-a granular media perspective. Granular Matter, 2010, 12, 607–616.10.1007/s10035-010-0202-y ↗
16. Tschinkel W R. The nest architecture of the ant, Camponotus socius. Journal of Insect Science, 2005, 5, 9.10.1093/jis/5.1.9 ↗
17. Sudd J H. The excavation of soil by ants. Ethology, 1969, 26, 257–276.
18. Sudd J H. Specific patterns of excavation in isolated ants. Insectes Sociaux, 1970, 17, 253–260.10.1007/BF02224717 ↗
19. Sowig P. Brood care in the dung beetle Onthophagus vacca (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): The effect of soil moisture on time budget, nest structure, and reproductive success. Ecography, 1996, 19, 254–258.
20. Anderson J R, Loomis E C. Exotic dung beetles in pasture and range land ecosystems. California Agriculture, 1978, 32, 31–32.
21. Ljungberg H. Notes on north European Onthophagus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Entomologisk Tidskrift, 2002, 123, 35–49.
22. Tvedten S L. The Best Control II - An Encyclopedia of Integrated Pest Management. Institute of Pest Management, [2018-12-13], https://doi.org/www.learnipm.com/enroll.htm
23. Dorgan K M, Arwade S R, Jumars P A. Burrowing in marine muds by crack propagation: Kinematics and forces. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2007, 210, 4198–4212.10.1242/jeb.010371 ↗
24. Gidmark N J, Strother J A, Horton J M, Summers A P, Brainerd E L. Locomotory transition from water to sand and its effects on undulatory kinematics in sand lances (Ammodytidae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 2011, 214, 657–664.10.1242/jeb.047068 ↗
25. Li M, Chen D H, Zhang S J, Tong J. Biomimeitc design of a stubble-cutting disc using finite element analysis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2013, 10, 118–127.10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60206-1 ↗
26. Watson J T, Ritzmann R E. Leg kinematics and muscle activity during treadmill running in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis, I. Slow running. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1998, 182, 11–22.10.1007/s003590050153 ↗
27. Kram R. Inexpensive load carrying by rhinoceros beetles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1996, 199, 609–612.10.1242/jeb.199.3.609 ↗