Aerodynamic Performance of Three Flapping Wings with Unequal Spacing in Tandem Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Lissaman, P. B. S., & Shollenberger, C. A. (1970). Formation flight of birds. Science, 168, 1003–1005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.168.3934.1003210.1126/science.168.3934.10032 ↗
2. Weihs, D. (1973). Hydromechanics of fish schooling. Nature, 241, 290–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/241290a010.1038/241290a0 ↗
3. Gould, L. L., & Heppner, F. (1974). The vee formation of Canada geese. The Auk, 9, 494–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/408446910.2307/4084469 ↗
4. Williams, T. C., Klonowski, T. J., & Berkeley, P. (1976). Angle of Canada goose V flight formation measured by radar. The Auk, 93, 554–559. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4084956
5. Weimerskirch, H., Martin, J., Clerquin, Y., Alexandre, P., & Jiraskova, S. (2001). Energy saving in flight formation. Nature, 413, 697–698. https://doi.org/10.1038/3509967010.1038/35099670 ↗
6. Liao, J. C., Beal, D. N., Lauder, G. V., & Triantafyllou, M. S. (2003). Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science, 302, 1566–1569. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108829510.1126/science.1088295 ↗
7. Usherwood, J. R., Stavrou, M., Lowe, J. C., Roskilly, K., & Wilson, A. M. (2011). Flying in a flock comes at a cost in pigeons. Nature, 474, 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1016410.1038/nature10164 ↗
8. Portugal, S. J., Hubel, T. Y., Fritz, J., Heese, S., Trobe, D., Voelkl, B., Hailes, S., Wilson, A. M., & Usherwood, J. R. (2014). Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight. Nature, 505, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1293910.1038/nature12939 ↗
9. Marras, S., Killen, S. S., Lindström, J., McKenzie, D. J., Steffensen, J. F., & Domenici, P. (2015). Fish swimming in schools save energy regardless of their spatial position. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1834-410.1007/s00265-014-1834-4 ↗
10. Cutts, C., & Speakman, J. (1994). Energy savings in formation flight of pink-footed geese. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 189, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.189.1.25110.1242/jeb.189.1.251 ↗
11. Bajec, I. L., & Heppner, F. H. (2009). Organized flight in birds. Animal Behaviour, 78, 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.00710.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.007 ↗
12. Akhtar, I., Mittal, R., Lauder, G. V., & Drucker, E. (2007). Hydrodynamics of a biologically inspired tandem flapping foil configuration. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 21, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-007-0045-210.1007/s00162-007-0045-2 ↗
13. Wang, Z. J., & Russell, D. (2007). Effect of forewing and hindwing interactions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Physical Review Letters, 99, 148101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.14810110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.148101 ↗
14. Broering, T. M., & Lian, Y. S. (2015). Numerical study of tandem flapping wing aerodynamics in both two and three dimensions. Computers and Fluids, 115, 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.04.00310.1016/j.compfluid.2015.04.003 ↗
15. Srinidhi, N., & Vengadesan, S. (2017). Ground effect on tandem flapping wings hovering. Computers and Fluids, 152, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.04.00610.1016/j.compfluid.2017.04.006 ↗
16. Broering, T. M., & Lian, Y. S. (2012). The effect of phase angle and wing spacing on tandem flapping wings. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 28, 1557–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-012-0210-810.1007/s10409-012-0210-8 ↗
17. Boschitsch, B. M., Dewey, P. A., & Smits, A. J. (2014). Propulsive performance of unsteady tandem hydrofoils in an in-line configuration. Physics of Fluids, 26, 051901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.487230810.1063/1.4872308 ↗
18. Kurt, M., & Moored, K. W. (2018). Flow interactions of two- and three-dimensional networked bio-inspired control elements in an in-line arrangement. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 13, 045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aabf4c10.1088/1748-3190/aabf4c ↗
19. Hu, Z., & Deng, X. Y. (2014). Aerodynamic interaction between forewing and hindwing of a hovering dragonfly. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 30, 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-014-0118-610.1007/s10409-014-0118-6 ↗
20. Gong, W. Q., Jia, B. B., & Xi, G. (2015). Experimental study on mean thrust of two plunging wings in Tandem. AIAA Journal, 53, 1693–1705. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05345210.2514/1.J053452 ↗
21. Lua, K. B., Lu, H., Zhang, X. H., Lim, T. T., & Yeo, K. S. (2016). Aerodynamics of two-dimensional flapping wings in tandem configuration. Physics of Fluids, 28, 121901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497185910.1063/1.4971859 ↗
22. Deng, J., Shao, X. M., & Yu, Z. S. (2007). Hydrodynamic studies on two traveling wavy foils in tandem arrangement. Physics of Fluids, 19, 113104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.281425910.1063/1.2814259 ↗
23. Chen, L., Sun, W., & Wang, Y. Q. (2023). Effects of flapping deviation on the hovering performance of tandem pitching-plunging foils. Computers and Fluids, 250, 105708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.10570810.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105708 ↗
24. Joshi, V., & Mysa, R. C. (2021). Mechanism of wake-induced flow dynamics in tandem flapping foils: Effect of the chord and gap ratios on propulsion. Physics of Fluids, 33, 087104. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.005782710.1063/5.0057827 ↗
25. Han, J. K., Zhang, Y., & Chen, G. (2019). Effects of individual horizontal distance on the three-dimensional bionic flapping multi-wings in different schooling configurations. Physics of Fluids, 31, 041903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.508762410.1063/1.5087624 ↗
26. Park, S. G., & Sung, H. J. (2018). Hydrodynamics of flexible fins propelled in tandem, diagonal, triangular and diamond configurations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 840, 154–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.6410.1017/jfm.2018.64 ↗
27. Pan, Y., & Dong, H. (2020). Computational analysis of hydrodynamic interactions in a high-density fish school. Physics of Fluids, 32, 121901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.002868210.1063/5.0028682 ↗
28. Meng, X. G., Chen, Z. S., Zhang, Y., & Chen, G. (2022). Aerodynamic performance and flow mechanism of multi-flapping wings with different spatial arrangements. Physics of Fluids, 34, 021907. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.008039510.1063/5.0080395 ↗
29. Meng, X. G., Chen, Z. S., Wang, D. S., Jiang, S. J., & Chen, G. (2023). Aerodynamic interference of three flapping wings in tandem configuration. Physics of Fluids, 35, 031911. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.014284610.1063/5.0142846 ↗
30. Voelkl, B., Portugal, S. J., Unsöld, M., Usherwood, J. R., Wilson, A. M., & Fritz, J. (2015). Matching times of leading and following suggest cooperation through direct reciprocity during V-formation flight in ibis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 2115–2120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.141358911210.1073/pnas.1413589112 ↗
31. Meng, X. G., Chen, Z. S., Xie, Y. X., & Chen, G. (2023). Effects of unequal individual spacing on the aerodynamic performance of three flapping wings in tandem. The International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences, 27, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.32604/icces.2023.0989210.32604/icces.2023.09892 ↗
32. Liu, Y. P., & Sun, M. (2008). Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211, 2014–2025. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01693110.1242/jeb.016931 ↗
33. Meng, X. G., Zhang, Y., & Chen, G. (2020). Ceiling effects on the aerodynamics of a flapping wing with advance ratio. Physics of Fluids, 32, 021904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.513993010.1063/1.5139930 ↗
34. Meng, X. G., & Sun, M. (2016). Wing and body kinematics of forward flight in drone-flies. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 11, 056002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/05600210.1088/1748-3190/11/5/056002 ↗
35. Rogers, S. E., Kwak, D., & Kiris, C. (1991). Steady and Unsteady Solutions of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations. AIAA Journal, 29, 603–610. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.1062710.2514/3.10627 ↗
36. Rogers, S. E., & Pulliam, T. H. (1994). Accuracy enhancements for overset grids using a defect correction approach. AIAA Journal, 94, 0523. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-52310.2514/6.1994-523 ↗
37. Meng, X. G. (2019). Ceiling effects on the aerodynamics of a flapping wing at hovering condition. Physics of Fluids, 31, 051905. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.509466110.1063/1.5094661 ↗
38. Meng, X. G., Ghaffar, A., Zhang, Y., & Deng, C. J. (2021). Very low Reynolds number causes a monotonic force enhancement trend for a three-dimensional hovering wing in ground effect. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 16, 055066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ac130810.1088/1748-3190/ac1308 ↗
39. Cheng, X., & Sun, M. (2018). Very small insects use novel wing flapping and drag principle to generate the weight-supporting vertical force. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 855, 646–670. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.66810.1017/jfm.2018.668 ↗
40. Hilgenstock, A. (1988). A fast method for the elliptic generation of three-dimensional grids with full boundary control. Numerical Grid Generation in Computational Fluid Mechanics’, 88, 137–146.
41. Gao, A. K., Zou, S. F., Shi, Y. P., & Wu, J. Z. (2019). Passing-over leading-edge vortex: The thrust booster in heaving airfoil. AIP Advances, 9, 035314. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.506469610.1063/1.5064696 ↗
42. Lyu, Y. Z., Zhu, H. J., & Sun, M. (2019). Flapping-mode changes and aerodynamic mechanisms in miniature insects. Physical Review E, 99, 012419. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.01241910.1103/PhysRevE.99.012419 ↗
43. Chen, L., Cheng, C., Zhou, C., Zhang, Y. L., & Wu, J. H. (2024). Flapping rotary wing: a novel low-Reynolds number layout merging bionic features into micro rotors. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 146, 100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.10098410.1063/5.0039911 ↗
44. Yu, X., & Sun, M. (2009). A computational study of the wing–wing and wing–body interactions of a model insect. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 25, 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-009-0266-210.1007/s10409-009-0266-2 ↗
45. Liang, B., & Sun, M. (2013). Aerodynamic interactions between wing and body of a model insect in forward flight and maneuvers. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 10, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60195-X10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60195-X ↗