Multivariate image analysis in gaussian multi-scale space for defect detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Inspired by the coarse-to-fine visual perception process of human vision system, a new approach based on Gaussian multi-scale space for defect detection of industrial products was proposed. By selecting different scale parameters of the Gaussian kernel, the multi-scale representation of the original image data could be obtained and used to constitute the multivariate image, in which each channel could represent a perceptual observation of the original image from different scales. The Multivariate Image Analysis (MIA) techniques were used to extract defect features information. The MIA combined Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to obtain the principal component scores of the multivariate test image. The Q-statistic image, derived from the residuals after the extraction of the first principal component score and noise, could be used to efficiently reveal the surface defects with an appropriate threshold value decided by training images. Experimental results show that the proposed method performs better than the gray histogram-based method. It has less sensitivity to the inhomogeneous of illumination, and has more robustness and reliability of defect detection with lower pseudo reject rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Image Processing Techniques and Applications · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Maenpaa T, Turtinen M, Pietikainen M. Real-time surface inspection by texture. Real-Time Imaging, 2003, 9, 289–296.10.1016/S1077-2014(03)00041-X ↗
2. Ng H F. Automatic thresholding for defect detection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2006, 27, 1644–1649.10.1016/j.patrec.2006.03.009 ↗
3. Xie X. A review of recent advances in surface defect detection using texture analysis techniques. Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis, 2008, 7, 1–22.10.5565/rev/elcvia.268 ↗
4. Wang X Y, Zhang Y, Fu X J, Xiang G S. Design and kinematic analysis of a novel humanoid robot eye using pneumatic artificial muscles. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5, 264–270.10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60034-7 ↗
5. Kumar A, Pang G K H. Defect detection in textured materials using Gabor filters. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2002, 38, 425–440.10.1109/28.993164 ↗
6. Koenderink J J. The structure of images. Biological Cybernetics, 1984, 50, 363–370.10.1007/BF00336961 ↗
7. Tony Lindeberg. Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision, Kluwer/Springer, Boston, MA, 1994.10.1007/978-1-4757-6465-9 ↗
8. Lindeberg T. Scale-space theory: A basic tool for analyzing structures at different scales. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1994, 21, 225–270.10.1080/757582976 ↗
9. Young R A, Lesperance R M, Meyer W W. The Gaussian derivative model for spatial-temporal vision: I. Cortical model. Spatial Vision, 2001, 14, 261–319.10.1163/156856801753253582 ↗
10. DeAngelis G C, Ohzawa I, Freeman R D. Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 1995, 18, 451–458.10.1016/0166-2236(95)94496-R ↗
11. ter Haar Romeny B M, Florack L M J. Front end vision: A multiscale geometry engine. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Biologically Motivated Computer Vision, Seoul, Korea, 2000, 297–307.10.1007/3-540-45482-9_29 ↗
12. Lindeberg T. Feature detection with automatic scale selection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1998, 30, 79–116.10.1023/A:1008045108935 ↗
13. Wang Y, Bahrami S, Zhu S C. Perceptual scale space and its applications. Proceeding of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’05), Beijing, China, 2005, 58–65.10.1109/ICCV.2005.187 ↗
14. Geladi P, Grahn H. Multivariate Image Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1996.
15. Bharati M H, MacGregor J F, Tropper W. Softwood lumer grading through on-line multivariate image analysis techniques. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42, 5345–5353.10.1021/ie0210560 ↗
16. Prats-Montalban J M, Ferrer A. Integration of colour and textural information in multivariate image analysis: Defect detection and classification issues. Journal of Chemometrics, 2007, 21, 10–23.10.1002/cem.1026 ↗
17. Bharati M H. Multivariate Image Analysis and Regression for Industrial Process Monitoring and Product Quality Control, PhD Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton (Ontario), Canada, 2002.
18. Bharati M H, MacGregor J F. Multivariate image analysis for real-time process monitoring and control. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1998, 37, 4715–4724.10.1021/ie980334l ↗
19. Geladi P, Isaksson H, Lindqvist L, Wold S, Esbensen K. Principal component analysis of multivariate images. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1989, 5, 209–220.10.1016/0169-7439(89)80049-8 ↗
20. Shlens J. A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis, University of California, San Diego, [2009-8-22], http://www.snl.salk.edu/∼shlens/pub/notes/pca.pdf
21. Ledaupin S, Hanafi M, Qannari E M. Simplification and signification of principal components. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2004, 74, 277–281.10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.05.006 ↗
22. Nomikos P, Macgregor J F. Multivariate SPC charts for monitoring batch processes. Technometrics, 1995, 37, 41–59.10.1080/00401706.1995.10485888 ↗
23. Gonzalez R C, Woods R E. Digital Image Processing, 2nd ed, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 2002.
24. Prats-Montalban J M, Ferrer A, Malo J L, Gorbena J. A comparison of different discriminant analysis techniques in a steel industry welding process. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2006, 80, 109–119.10.1016/j.chemolab.2005.08.005 ↗
25. Xie X, Mirmehdi M, Thomas B. Colour tonality inspection using eigenspace features. Machine Vision and Applications, 2001, 16, 364–373.10.1007/s00138-005-0008-9 ↗
26. Prats-Montalban J M, Lopez F, Valiente J M, Ferrer A. Multivariate statistical projection methods to perform robust feature extraction and classification in surface grading. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2008, 17, 031106.10.1117/1.2957886 ↗