journal article·2026-07

Aeroacoustics Comparison of Owl, Hawk, and NACA0012 Airfoils Using Microphone Measurements

M. Kazemi, M. Mani

Journal of Bionic Engineering· Volume 23· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Smith, M. J. (1989). Aircraft noise, (Cambridge Aerospace Series) (pp. 41–119), New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051158452710.1017/CBO9780511584527 ↗
2. Brooks, T. F., Pope, D. S., & Marcolini, M. A. (1989). Airfoil self-noise and prediction. In Report Number: NASA-RP-1218, vol. Document ID: 19890016302.
3. Brooks, T. F., & Schlinker, R. H. (1983). Progress in rotor broadband noise research, Vertica, 7(4), 287–307.
4. Doolan, C. D. (Ed.) (2022). Airfoil noise mechanisms and control. In Flow noise: Theory (pp. 139–171). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2484-2_8.10.1007/978-981-19-2484-2_8 ↗
5. Brooks, T. F., & Marcolini, M. A. (1985). Scaling of airfoil self-noise using measured flow parameters. AIAA Journal, 23(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.889610.2514/3.8896 ↗
6. Olsen, W., & Wagner, J. (1982). Effect of thickness on airfoil surface noise. AIAA Journal, 20(3), 437–439. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.792210.2514/3.7922 ↗
7. Lee, S. (2019). The effect of airfoil shape on trailing edge noise. Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics, 27(02), 1850020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S259172851850020210.1142/S2591728518500202 ↗
8. Gill, J., Zhang, X., & Joseph, P. (2013). Symmetric airfoil geometry effects on leading edge noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(4), 2669–2680. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.481876910.1121/1.4818769 ↗
9. Pröbsting, S., Scarano, F., & Morris, S. (2015). Regimes of tonal noise on an airfoil at moderate Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 780, 407–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.47510.1017/jfm.2015.475 ↗
10. Lockard, D. P., & Morris, P. J. (1998). Radiated noise from airfoils in realistic mean flows. AIAA Journal, 36(6), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.49410.2514/2.494 ↗
11. Mao, Y., Qi, D., & Gu, Y. (2012). Prediction of airfoil noise induced by low-Mach-number flow, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 226(5), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/095441001141202310.1177/0954410011412023 ↗
12. Jiang, M., Li, X., & Lin, D. (2013). Numerical simulation on the airfoil self-noise at low Mach number flows. In 50th AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition (p. 834). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-83410.2514/6.2012-834 ↗
13. Lacagnina, G., et al. (2019). Mechanisms of airfoil noise near stall conditions. Physical Review Fluids, 4(12), 123902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.12390210.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.123902 ↗
14. Pröbsting, S., & Yarusevych, S. (2015). Laminar separation bubble development on an airfoil emitting tonal noise. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 780, 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.42710.1017/jfm.2015.427 ↗
15. Ewert, R. (2008). Broadband slat noise prediction based on CAA and stochastic sound sources from a fast random particle-mesh (RPM) method. Computers & Fluids, 37(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.02.00310.1016/j.compfluid.2007.02.003 ↗
16. Akkermans, R. A., Ewert, R., Moghadam, S. M. A., Dierke, J., & Buchmann, N. (2015). Overset DNS with application to sound source prediction. In Progress in hybrid RANS-LES modelling: Papers contributed to the 5th symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES methods, 19–21 March 2014, College Station, A&M University, Texas, USA (pp. 59–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15141-0_410.1007/978-3-319-15141-0_4 ↗
17. Akkermans, R., Bernicke, P., Ewert, R., & Dierke, J. (2018). Zonal overset-LES with stochastic volume forcing. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 70, 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.11.00510.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.11.005 ↗
18. Bernicke, P., Akkermans, R., Ananthan, V. B., Ewert, R., Dierke, J., & Rossian, L. (2019). A zonal noise prediction method for trailing-edge noise with a porous model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 80, 108469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.10846910.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.108469 ↗
19. Hersh, A. S., Soderman, P. T., & Hayden, R. E. (1974). Investigation of acoustic effects of leading-edge serrations on airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, 11(4), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-273610.2514/6.2016-2736 ↗
20. Avallone, F., Pröbsting, S., & Ragni, D. (2016). Three-dimensional flow field over a trailing-edge serration and implications on broadband noise. Physics of Fluids, 28(11). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496663310.1063/1.4966633 ↗
21. Lyu, B., Ayton, L. J., & Chaitanya, P. (2019). On the acoustic optimality of leading-edge serration profiles. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 462, 114923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.11492310.1016/j.jsv.2019.114923 ↗
22. Moreau, D., & Doolan, C. (2016). The generation of tonal noise from sawtooth trailing-edge serrations at low Reynolds numbers. The Aeronautical Journal, 120(1228), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.3910.1017/aer.2016.39 ↗
23. Narayanan, S., Chaitanya, P., Haeri, S., Joseph, P., Kim, J. W., & Polacsek, C. (2015). Airfoil noise reductions through leading edge serrations. Physics of Fluids, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.490779810.1063/1.4907798 ↗
24. Geyer, T. F., & Sarradj, E. (2014). Trailing edge noise of partially porous airfoils. In 20th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (p. 3039). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-303910.2514/6.2014-3039 ↗
25. Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., & Fritzsche, C. (2010). Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Experiments in Fluids, 48, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x ↗
26. Carpio, A. R., Martínez, R. M., Avallone, F., Ragni, D., Snellen, M., & van der Zwaag, S. (2019). Experimental characterization of the turbulent boundary layer over a porous trailing edge for noise abatement. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 443, 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.12.01010.1016/j.jsv.2018.12.010 ↗
27. Teruna, C., Manegar, F., Avallone, F., Ragni, D., Casalino, D., & Carolus, T. (2020). Noise reduction mechanisms of an open-cell metal-foam trailing edge. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 898, A18.10.1017/jfm.2020.363 ↗
28. Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., & Fritzsche, C. (2010). Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Experiments in Fuids, 48(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x ↗
29. Finez, A., Jacob, M., Jondeau, E., & Roger, M. (2010). Broadband noise reduction with trailing edge brushes. In 16th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (p. 3980). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-398010.2514/6.2010-3980 ↗
30. Herr, M. (2007). Design criteria for low-noise trailing-edges. In 13th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (28th AIAA aeroacoustics conference) (p. 3470). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-347010.2514/6.2007-3470 ↗
31. Ananthan, V. B. (2023). R. A. red Trailing edge noise reduction using bio-inspired finlets. Journal of Sound and Vibration 549 117553 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117553.10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117553 ↗
32. Clark, I. A. (2017). Bio-inspired control of roughness and trailing edge noise. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
33. Wang, Y., Zhao, K., Lu, X. Y., Song, Y. B., & Bennett, G. J. (2019). Bio-inspired aerodynamic noise control: A bibliographic review. Applied Sciences, 9(11), 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/app911222410.3390/app9112224 ↗
34. Clark, I. A., et al. (2017). Bioinspired trailing-edge noise control. AIAA Journal, 55(3), 740–754. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05524310.2514/1.J055243 ↗
35. Casalino, D., Grande, E., Romani, G., Ragni, D., & Avallone, F. (2021). Definition of a benchmark for low Reynolds number propeller aeroacoustics. Aerospace Science and Technology, 113, 106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.10670710.1016/j.ast.2021.106707 ↗
36. Wang, M., & Liu, X. (2019). Numerical investigation of aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of bionic airfoils inspired by bird wing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 233(11), 4004–4016. https://doi.org/10.1177/095441001881261710.1177/0954410018812617 ↗
37. Shi, L., Zhang, C., Wang, J., & Ren, L. (2012). Numerical simulation of the effect of bionic serrated structures on the aerodynamic noise of a circular cylinder. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 9(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60101-710.1016/S1672-6529(11)60101-7 ↗
38. Wu, L., Liu, X., & Wang, M. (2020). Effects of bionic volute tongue on aerodynamic performance and noise characteristics of centrifugal fan used in the air-conditioner. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 17(4), 780–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0067-710.1007/s42235-020-0067-7 ↗
39. Bodling, A., & Sharma, A. (2017). Noise reduction mechanisms due to bio-inspired airfoil designs. In 17th International Symposium on transport phenomena and dynamics of rotating machinery (ISROMAC2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.00410.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.004 ↗
40. Inasawa, A., Ninomiya, C., & Asai, M. (2013). Suppression of tonal trailing-edge noise from an airfoil using a plasma actuator. AIAA Journal, 51(7), 1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05220310.2514/1.J052203 ↗
41. Yang, C., et al. (2023). Active control of airfoil turbulent boundary layer noise with trailing-edge blowing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(4), 2115–2115. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.001778710.1121/10.0017787 ↗
42. Cesar, L. M., Kamliya Jawahar, H., & Azarpeyvand, M. (2018). Airfoil trailing-edge noise reduction using flow suction. In 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (p. 2814). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-281410.2514/6.2018-2814 ↗
43. Clark, C. J., LePiane, K., & Liu, L. (2020). Evolution and ecology of silent flight in owls and other flying vertebrates. Integrative Organismal Biology, 2(1), obaa001. https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obaa00110.1093/iob/obaa001 ↗
44. Jaworski, J. W., & Peake, N. (2020). Aeroacoustics of silent owl flight. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 52(1), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-04043610.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436 ↗
45. Kondo, K. (2014). Analysis of owl-like airfoil aerodynamics at low Reynolds number flow. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Aerospace Technology Japan, 12(ists29), Tk_35–Tk_40. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfcmv.2018.6301510.4236/jfcmv.2018.63015 ↗
46. Aono, H., et al. (2020). Aerodynamics of owl-like wing model at low Reynolds numbers. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 63(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.63.810.2322/tjsass.63.8 ↗
47. Mozafari, M., Sadeghimalekabadi, M., Fardi, A., Bruecker, C., & Masdari, M. (2024). Aeroacoustic investigation of a ducted wind turbine employing bio-inspired airfoil profiles. Physics of Fluids, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.020405010.1063/5.0204050 ↗
48. Sesalim, D., & Naser, J. (2024). Effects of an owl airfoil on the aeroacoustics of a small wind turbine. Energies, 17(10), 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1710225410.3390/en17102254 ↗
49. Boughou, S., Omar, A. A., Elsayed, O., Boukharfane, R., & Aldheeb, M. (2022). Low Reynolds number effect on CFD prediction of bio inspired aerodynamics. In AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum (p. 1965). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-196510.2514/6.2022-1965 ↗
50. Omar, A. A., Kurban, A., & Jetlawi, M. (2023). Numerical simulation of the flapping eagle, owl and S1223 airfoils. In 2023 10th International Conference on recent advances in air and space technologies (RAST) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-196510.2514/6.2022-1965 ↗
51. Kazemi, M., Mani, M., Rezaei, H., & Ghanooni, P. (2025). Flow physics of bio-inspired airfoils using experimental and DES methods at reynolds numbers below 44× 103. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-025-10739-010.1007/s13369-025-10739-0 ↗
52. Kazemi, M., & Mani, M. (2025). Owl airfoil aerodynamic noise sources and performance compared to hawk and NACA0012 airfoils for low Reynolds applications. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 23261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06309-x10.1038/s41598-025-06309-x ↗
53. Kazemi, M. M. (2026). Comparative aeroacoustic performance of bio-inspired and conventional airfoils via coherent particle velocity method. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X25140766910.1177/1475472X251407669 ↗
54. Kreith, F. (1999). Fluid mechanics. CRC.10.1201/NOE0849397516-4 ↗
55. Liu, T., Kuykendoll, K., Rhew, R., & Jones, S. (2004). Avian wings. In 24th AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, p. 2186. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.1622410.2514/1.16224 ↗
56. Klän, S., Burgmann, S., Bachmann, T., Klaas, M., Wagner, H., & Schröder, W. (2012). Surface structure and dimensional effects on the aerodynamics of an owl-based wing model. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 33, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2011.12.00610.1016/j.euromechflu.2011.12.006 ↗
57. Sarradj, E., Fritzsche, C., & Geyer, T. (2011). Silent owl flight: Bird flyover noise measurements. AIAA Journal, 49(4), 769–779. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05070310.2514/1.J050703 ↗
58. Gomes, J. P., Bergmann, A., & Holthusen, H. (2019). Aeroacoustic wind tunnel design. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 10(1), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05070310.2514/1.J050703 ↗