Aeroacoustics Comparison of Owl, Hawk, and NACA0012 Airfoils Using Microphone Measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Smith, M. J. (1989). Aircraft noise, (Cambridge Aerospace Series) (pp. 41–119), New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051158452710.1017/CBO9780511584527 ↗
2. Brooks, T. F., Pope, D. S., & Marcolini, M. A. (1989). Airfoil self-noise and prediction. In Report Number: NASA-RP-1218, vol. Document ID: 19890016302.
3. Brooks, T. F., & Schlinker, R. H. (1983). Progress in rotor broadband noise research, Vertica, 7(4), 287–307.
4. Doolan, C. D. (Ed.) (2022). Airfoil noise mechanisms and control. In Flow noise: Theory (pp. 139–171). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2484-2_8.10.1007/978-981-19-2484-2_8 ↗
5. Brooks, T. F., & Marcolini, M. A. (1985). Scaling of airfoil self-noise using measured flow parameters. AIAA Journal, 23(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.889610.2514/3.8896 ↗
6. Olsen, W., & Wagner, J. (1982). Effect of thickness on airfoil surface noise. AIAA Journal, 20(3), 437–439. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.792210.2514/3.7922 ↗
7. Lee, S. (2019). The effect of airfoil shape on trailing edge noise. Journal of Theoretical and Computational Acoustics, 27(02), 1850020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S259172851850020210.1142/S2591728518500202 ↗
8. Gill, J., Zhang, X., & Joseph, P. (2013). Symmetric airfoil geometry effects on leading edge noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(4), 2669–2680. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.481876910.1121/1.4818769 ↗
9. Pröbsting, S., Scarano, F., & Morris, S. (2015). Regimes of tonal noise on an airfoil at moderate Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 780, 407–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.47510.1017/jfm.2015.475 ↗
10. Lockard, D. P., & Morris, P. J. (1998). Radiated noise from airfoils in realistic mean flows. AIAA Journal, 36(6), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.49410.2514/2.494 ↗
11. Mao, Y., Qi, D., & Gu, Y. (2012). Prediction of airfoil noise induced by low-Mach-number flow, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 226(5), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/095441001141202310.1177/0954410011412023 ↗
12. Jiang, M., Li, X., & Lin, D. (2013). Numerical simulation on the airfoil self-noise at low Mach number flows. In 50th AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition (p. 834). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-83410.2514/6.2012-834 ↗
13. Lacagnina, G., et al. (2019). Mechanisms of airfoil noise near stall conditions. Physical Review Fluids, 4(12), 123902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.12390210.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.123902 ↗
14. Pröbsting, S., & Yarusevych, S. (2015). Laminar separation bubble development on an airfoil emitting tonal noise. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 780, 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.42710.1017/jfm.2015.427 ↗
15. Ewert, R. (2008). Broadband slat noise prediction based on CAA and stochastic sound sources from a fast random particle-mesh (RPM) method. Computers & Fluids, 37(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.02.00310.1016/j.compfluid.2007.02.003 ↗
16. Akkermans, R. A., Ewert, R., Moghadam, S. M. A., Dierke, J., & Buchmann, N. (2015). Overset DNS with application to sound source prediction. In Progress in hybrid RANS-LES modelling: Papers contributed to the 5th symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES methods, 19–21 March 2014, College Station, A&M University, Texas, USA (pp. 59–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15141-0_410.1007/978-3-319-15141-0_4 ↗
17. Akkermans, R., Bernicke, P., Ewert, R., & Dierke, J. (2018). Zonal overset-LES with stochastic volume forcing. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 70, 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.11.00510.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.11.005 ↗
18. Bernicke, P., Akkermans, R., Ananthan, V. B., Ewert, R., Dierke, J., & Rossian, L. (2019). A zonal noise prediction method for trailing-edge noise with a porous model. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 80, 108469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.10846910.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.108469 ↗
19. Hersh, A. S., Soderman, P. T., & Hayden, R. E. (1974). Investigation of acoustic effects of leading-edge serrations on airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, 11(4), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-273610.2514/6.2016-2736 ↗
20. Avallone, F., Pröbsting, S., & Ragni, D. (2016). Three-dimensional flow field over a trailing-edge serration and implications on broadband noise. Physics of Fluids, 28(11). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496663310.1063/1.4966633 ↗
21. Lyu, B., Ayton, L. J., & Chaitanya, P. (2019). On the acoustic optimality of leading-edge serration profiles. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 462, 114923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.11492310.1016/j.jsv.2019.114923 ↗
22. Moreau, D., & Doolan, C. (2016). The generation of tonal noise from sawtooth trailing-edge serrations at low Reynolds numbers. The Aeronautical Journal, 120(1228), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2016.3910.1017/aer.2016.39 ↗
23. Narayanan, S., Chaitanya, P., Haeri, S., Joseph, P., Kim, J. W., & Polacsek, C. (2015). Airfoil noise reductions through leading edge serrations. Physics of Fluids, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.490779810.1063/1.4907798 ↗
24. Geyer, T. F., & Sarradj, E. (2014). Trailing edge noise of partially porous airfoils. In 20th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (p. 3039). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-303910.2514/6.2014-3039 ↗
25. Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., & Fritzsche, C. (2010). Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Experiments in Fluids, 48, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x ↗
26. Carpio, A. R., Martínez, R. M., Avallone, F., Ragni, D., Snellen, M., & van der Zwaag, S. (2019). Experimental characterization of the turbulent boundary layer over a porous trailing edge for noise abatement. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 443, 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.12.01010.1016/j.jsv.2018.12.010 ↗
27. Teruna, C., Manegar, F., Avallone, F., Ragni, D., Casalino, D., & Carolus, T. (2020). Noise reduction mechanisms of an open-cell metal-foam trailing edge. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 898, A18.10.1017/jfm.2020.363 ↗
28. Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., & Fritzsche, C. (2010). Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Experiments in Fuids, 48(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x ↗
29. Finez, A., Jacob, M., Jondeau, E., & Roger, M. (2010). Broadband noise reduction with trailing edge brushes. In 16th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (p. 3980). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-398010.2514/6.2010-3980 ↗
30. Herr, M. (2007). Design criteria for low-noise trailing-edges. In 13th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (28th AIAA aeroacoustics conference) (p. 3470). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-347010.2514/6.2007-3470 ↗
31. Ananthan, V. B. (2023). R. A. red Trailing edge noise reduction using bio-inspired finlets. Journal of Sound and Vibration 549 117553 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117553.10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117553 ↗
32. Clark, I. A. (2017). Bio-inspired control of roughness and trailing edge noise. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
33. Wang, Y., Zhao, K., Lu, X. Y., Song, Y. B., & Bennett, G. J. (2019). Bio-inspired aerodynamic noise control: A bibliographic review. Applied Sciences, 9(11), 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/app911222410.3390/app9112224 ↗
34. Clark, I. A., et al. (2017). Bioinspired trailing-edge noise control. AIAA Journal, 55(3), 740–754. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05524310.2514/1.J055243 ↗
35. Casalino, D., Grande, E., Romani, G., Ragni, D., & Avallone, F. (2021). Definition of a benchmark for low Reynolds number propeller aeroacoustics. Aerospace Science and Technology, 113, 106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.10670710.1016/j.ast.2021.106707 ↗
36. Wang, M., & Liu, X. (2019). Numerical investigation of aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of bionic airfoils inspired by bird wing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 233(11), 4004–4016. https://doi.org/10.1177/095441001881261710.1177/0954410018812617 ↗
37. Shi, L., Zhang, C., Wang, J., & Ren, L. (2012). Numerical simulation of the effect of bionic serrated structures on the aerodynamic noise of a circular cylinder. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 9(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60101-710.1016/S1672-6529(11)60101-7 ↗
38. Wu, L., Liu, X., & Wang, M. (2020). Effects of bionic volute tongue on aerodynamic performance and noise characteristics of centrifugal fan used in the air-conditioner. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 17(4), 780–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0067-710.1007/s42235-020-0067-7 ↗
39. Bodling, A., & Sharma, A. (2017). Noise reduction mechanisms due to bio-inspired airfoil designs. In 17th International Symposium on transport phenomena and dynamics of rotating machinery (ISROMAC2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.00410.1016/j.jsv.2019.02.004 ↗
40. Inasawa, A., Ninomiya, C., & Asai, M. (2013). Suppression of tonal trailing-edge noise from an airfoil using a plasma actuator. AIAA Journal, 51(7), 1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05220310.2514/1.J052203 ↗
41. Yang, C., et al. (2023). Active control of airfoil turbulent boundary layer noise with trailing-edge blowing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(4), 2115–2115. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.001778710.1121/10.0017787 ↗
42. Cesar, L. M., Kamliya Jawahar, H., & Azarpeyvand, M. (2018). Airfoil trailing-edge noise reduction using flow suction. In 2018 AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (p. 2814). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-281410.2514/6.2018-2814 ↗
43. Clark, C. J., LePiane, K., & Liu, L. (2020). Evolution and ecology of silent flight in owls and other flying vertebrates. Integrative Organismal Biology, 2(1), obaa001. https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obaa00110.1093/iob/obaa001 ↗
44. Jaworski, J. W., & Peake, N. (2020). Aeroacoustics of silent owl flight. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 52(1), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-04043610.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040436 ↗
45. Kondo, K. (2014). Analysis of owl-like airfoil aerodynamics at low Reynolds number flow. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Aerospace Technology Japan, 12(ists29), Tk_35–Tk_40. https://doi.org/10.4236/jfcmv.2018.6301510.4236/jfcmv.2018.63015 ↗
46. Aono, H., et al. (2020). Aerodynamics of owl-like wing model at low Reynolds numbers. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 63(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.63.810.2322/tjsass.63.8 ↗
47. Mozafari, M., Sadeghimalekabadi, M., Fardi, A., Bruecker, C., & Masdari, M. (2024). Aeroacoustic investigation of a ducted wind turbine employing bio-inspired airfoil profiles. Physics of Fluids, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.020405010.1063/5.0204050 ↗
48. Sesalim, D., & Naser, J. (2024). Effects of an owl airfoil on the aeroacoustics of a small wind turbine. Energies, 17(10), 2254. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1710225410.3390/en17102254 ↗
49. Boughou, S., Omar, A. A., Elsayed, O., Boukharfane, R., & Aldheeb, M. (2022). Low Reynolds number effect on CFD prediction of bio inspired aerodynamics. In AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum (p. 1965). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-196510.2514/6.2022-1965 ↗
50. Omar, A. A., Kurban, A., & Jetlawi, M. (2023). Numerical simulation of the flapping eagle, owl and S1223 airfoils. In 2023 10th International Conference on recent advances in air and space technologies (RAST) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-196510.2514/6.2022-1965 ↗
51. Kazemi, M., Mani, M., Rezaei, H., & Ghanooni, P. (2025). Flow physics of bio-inspired airfoils using experimental and DES methods at reynolds numbers below 44× 103. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-025-10739-010.1007/s13369-025-10739-0 ↗
52. Kazemi, M., & Mani, M. (2025). Owl airfoil aerodynamic noise sources and performance compared to hawk and NACA0012 airfoils for low Reynolds applications. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 23261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06309-x10.1038/s41598-025-06309-x ↗
53. Kazemi, M. M. (2026). Comparative aeroacoustic performance of bio-inspired and conventional airfoils via coherent particle velocity method. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475472X25140766910.1177/1475472X251407669 ↗
54. Kreith, F. (1999). Fluid mechanics. CRC.10.1201/NOE0849397516-4 ↗
55. Liu, T., Kuykendoll, K., Rhew, R., & Jones, S. (2004). Avian wings. In 24th AIAA aerodynamic measurement technology and ground testing conference, p. 2186. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.1622410.2514/1.16224 ↗
56. Klän, S., Burgmann, S., Bachmann, T., Klaas, M., Wagner, H., & Schröder, W. (2012). Surface structure and dimensional effects on the aerodynamics of an owl-based wing model. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 33, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2011.12.00610.1016/j.euromechflu.2011.12.006 ↗
57. Sarradj, E., Fritzsche, C., & Geyer, T. (2011). Silent owl flight: Bird flyover noise measurements. AIAA Journal, 49(4), 769–779. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05070310.2514/1.J050703 ↗
58. Gomes, J. P., Bergmann, A., & Holthusen, H. (2019). Aeroacoustic wind tunnel design. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 10(1), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05070310.2514/1.J050703 ↗