Bio-inspired Dyna-LIO: A Frog Vision-based LiDAR SLAM for Engineering Vehicles in Dynamic Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Soft Robotics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang, Y., Liu, X., Ren, Z., Yao, Z., & Tan, X. (2024). Synchronized path planning and tracking for front and rear axles in articulated wheel loaders. Automation in Construction, 165, Article 105538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.10553810.1016/j.autcon.2024.105538 ↗
2. Tan, X., Wei, W., Liu, C., Cheng, K., Wang, Y., Yao, Z., & Huang, Q. (2025). Reinforcement learning-based trajectory planning for continuous digging of excavator working devices in trenching tasks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 40, 1847–1870. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.1342810.1111/mice.13428 ↗
3. Tan, X., Wei, W., Liu, C., Cheng, K., Wang, Y., Yao, Z., & Huang, Q. (2025). Reinforcement learning-based trajectory planning for continuous digging of excavator working devices in trenching tasks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 40, 1847–1870. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.1342810.1111/mice.13428 ↗
4. Wang, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, Q., He, H., & Yao, Z. (2023). Target detection for construction machinery based on deep learning and multisource data fusion. IEEE Sensors Journal, 23(10), 11070–11081. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.326452610.1109/JSEN.2023.3264526 ↗
5. Cheng, J., Zhang, L., Chen, Q., Hu, X., & Cai, J. (2022). A review of visual SLAM methods for autonomous driving vehicles. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 114, Article 104992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.10499210.1016/j.engappai.2022.104992 ↗
6. Mikoś, M., Kazmierski, K., Wachulec, N., & Sośnica, K. (2024). Accuracy of satellite positioning using GNSS receivers in sports watches. Measurement, 229, Article 114426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11442610.1016/j.measurement.2024.114426 ↗
7. Yan, X., Liu, C., Jiang, M., Yang, M., Feng, W., Zhong, M., & Peng, L. (2023). Performance analysis of oceanographic research vessel precise point positioning based on BDS/GNSS RTK receivers. Measurement, 211, Article 112637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11263710.1016/j.measurement.2023.112637 ↗
8. Harindranath, A., & Arora, M. (2024). A systematic review of user-conducted calibration methods for MEMS-based IMUs. Measurement, 225, Article 114001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11400110.1016/j.measurement.2023.114001 ↗
9. Durrant-Whyte, H., & Bailey, T. (2006). Simultaneous localization and mapping: Part I. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 13(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2006.163802210.1109/MRA.2006.1638022 ↗
10. Atoui, O., Husni, H., & Mat, R. C. (2019). Visual-based semantic simultaneous localization and mapping for robotic applications: A review. AIP Conference Proceedings, Kedah, Malaysia, pp. 030005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.512108210.1063/1.5121082 ↗
11. Zhang, J., & Singh, S. (2014). LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in real-time. Robotics: Science and SystemsBerkeley, CA, USA, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2014.X.00710.15607/RSS.2014.X.007 ↗
12. Zeng, Q., Tao, X., Yu, H., Ji, X., Chang, T., & Hu, Y. (2024). An indoor 2-D LiDAR SLAM and localization method based on artificial landmark assistance. IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(3), 3681–3692. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.334183210.1109/JSEN.2023.3341832 ↗
13. Xu, Y., Jiang, L., Zhang, Z., Lei, B., Jiang, J., & Zhu, J. (2024). Semantic surrounding projection for object height estimation using single-line lidar and image. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 113, Article 109034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.10903410.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.109034 ↗
14. GhaemiDizaji, M., Dadkhah, C., & Leung, H. (2021). Efficient robot localization and SLAM algorithms using opposition based high dimensional optimization algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 104, Article 104308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.10430810.1016/j.engappai.2021.104308 ↗
15. Tan, X., Chen, C., Yao, Z., Wang, G., & Huang, Q. (2025). Bio-inspired excavator digging trajectory planning: Insights from mole digging patterns. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 22(3), 1287–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-025-00685-w10.1007/s42235-025-00685-w ↗
16. Zhang, J., & Singh, S. (2014). LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in real-time. Robotics: Science and Systems, Berkeley, CA, USA, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15607/RSS.2014.X.00710.15607/RSS.2014.X.007 ↗
17. Wang, H., Wang, C., & Xie, L. (2020). Intensity scan context: Coding intensity and geometry relations for loop closure detection. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, 2095–2101. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.919676410.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196764 ↗
18. Dellenbach, P., Deschaud, J. E., Jacquet, B., & Goulette, F. (2022). CT-ICP: Real-time elastic LiDAR odometry with loop closure. 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 5580–5586). Philadelphia, PA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.981184910.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811849 ↗
19. Ye, H., Chen, Y., & Liu, M. (2019). Tightly coupled 3D lidar inertial odometry and mapping. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 3144–3150). Montreal, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.879351110.1109/ICRA.2019.8793511 ↗
20. Xu, W., & Zhang, F. (2021). FAST-LIO: A fast, robust LiDAR-inertial odometry package by tightly-coupled iterated Kalman filter. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 3317–3324. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.306422710.1109/LRA.2021.3064227 ↗
21. Lin, J., & Zhang, F. (2022). R3LIVE: A robust, real-time, RGB-colored, LiDAR-inertial-visual tightly-coupled state estimation and mapping package. 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 10672–10678). Philadelphia(PA), USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.981193510.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811935 ↗
22. Kim, J., Woo, J., & Im, S. (2022). RVMOS: Range-view moving object segmentation leveraged by semantic and motion features. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3), 8044–8051. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.318608010.1109/LRA.2022.3186080 ↗
23. Mersch, B., Chen, X., Vizzo, I., Nunes, L., Behley, J., & Stachniss, C. (2022). Receding moving object segmentation in 3D LiDAR data using sparse 4D convolutions. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3), 7503–7510. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.318324510.1109/LRA.2022.3183245 ↗
24. Sun, J., Dai, Y., Zhang, X., Xu, J., Ai, R., Gu, W., & Chen, X. (2022). Efficient spatial-temporal information fusion for LiDAR-based 3D moving object segmentation. 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 11456–11463. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS47612.2022.998121010.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981210 ↗
25. Schauer, J., & Nüchter, A. (2018). The peopleremover-Removing dynamic objects from 3-D point cloud data by traversing a voxel occupancy grid. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(3), 1679–1686. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.280179710.1109/LRA.2018.2801797 ↗
26. Pagad, S., Agarwal, D., Narayanan, S., Rangan, K., Kim, H., & Yalla, G. (2020). Robust method for removing dynamic objects from point clouds. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Paris, France, pp. 10765–10771. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.919716810.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197168 ↗
27. Yoon, D., Tang, T., & Barfoot, T. (2019). Mapless online detection of dynamic objects in 3D lidar. 2019 16th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV), Kingston, Canada, pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/CRV.2019.0002310.1109/CRV.2019.00023 ↗
28. Pomerleau, F., Krüsi, P., Colas, F., Furgale, P., & Siegwart, R. (2014). Long-term 3D map maintenance in dynamic environments. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China, pp. 3712–3719. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.690739710.1109/ICRA.2014.6907397 ↗
29. Kim, G., & Kim, A. (2020). Remove, then revert: Static point cloud map construction using multiresolution range images. 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, USA, pp. 10758–10765. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.934085610.1109/IROS45743.2020.9340856 ↗
30. Hu, X., Yan, L., Xie, H., Dai, J., Zhao, Y., & Su, S. (2022). A novel lidar inertial odometry with moving object detection for dynamic scenes. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS), Guangzhou, China, pp. 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUS55513.2022.998666110.1109/ICUS55513.2022.9986661 ↗
31. Li, F., Fu, C., Wang, S., Zhu, Y., Li, Z., & Feng, B. (2021). Lidar-based vehicle detection for dynamic SLAM applications. 2021 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS), Xi’an, China, pp. 674–678. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAIS52680.2021.962459210.1109/ICCAIS52680.2021.9624592 ↗
32. Tian, X., Zhu, Z., Zhao, J., Tian, G., & Ye, C. (2024). DL-SLOT: Tightly-coupled dynamic LiDAR SLAM and 3D object tracking based on collaborative graph optimization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 9(1), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2023.331730810.1109/TIV.2023.3317308 ↗
33. Vaquero, V., Fischer, K., Moreno-Noguer, F., Sanfeliu, A., & Milz, S. (2019). Improving map re-localization with deep ‘movable’ objects segmentation on 3D LiDAR point clouds. 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 942–949. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2019.891739010.1109/ITSC.2019.8917390 ↗
34. Chen, X., Milioto, A., Palazzolo, E., Giguère, P., Behley, J., & Stachniss, C. (2019). SuMa++: Efficient LiDAR-based semantic SLAM. 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China, pp. 4530–4537. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS40897.2019.896770410.1109/IROS40897.2019.8967704 ↗
35. Serres, J. R., & Ruffier, F. (2015). Biomimetic autopilot based on minimalistic motion vision for navigating along corridors comprising U-shaped and S-shaped turns. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 12(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(14)60099-810.1016/S1672-6529(14)60099-8 ↗
36. Sanada, A., Ishii, K., & Yagi, T. (2010). Self-localization of an omnidirectional mobile robot based on an optical flow sensor. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 7, S172–S176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(09)60232-810.1016/S1672-6529(09)60232-8 ↗
37. Chen, H., Shen, X., Li, X., & Jin, Y. (2021). Bionic mosaic method of panoramic image based on compound eye of fly. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 8(4), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60049-810.1016/S1672-6529(11)60049-8 ↗
38. Liu, F., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, M., Hou, T., & Han, Z. (2022). Target-oriented passive localization techniques inspired by terrestrial arthropods: A review. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 19(3), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00157-510.1007/s42235-022-00157-5 ↗
39. Daïni, X., Raffin, R., Raharijaona, T., & Ruffier, F. (2025). Netting and background distinction with in-flight optic flow. Journal of Bionic Engineering,1–24,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-025-00677-w10.1007/s42235-025-00677-w ↗
40. Yuan, J., Guo, W., Hou, Z., Zha, F., Li, M., Sun, L., & Wang, P. (2023). Robot navigation strategy in complex environment based on episode cognition. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00265-210.1007/s42235-022-00265-2 ↗
41. Huang, Y., Li, P., Yan, S., Tan, M., Yu, J., & Wu, Z. (2024). Self-localization of a biomimetic robotic shark using tightly coupled visual-acoustic fusion. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 71(10), 12581–12591. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2024.335214710.1109/TIE.2024.3352147 ↗
42. Yin, Z., Kaiser, M. A., Camara, L. O., Camarena, M., Parsa, M., Jacob, A., Schwartz, G., & Jaiswal, A. (2023). Iris: Integrated retinal functionality in image sensors. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, 1241691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.124169110.3389/fnins.2023.1241691 ↗
43. Liang, S., Cao, Z., Wang, C., & Yu, J. (2021). A novel 3D LiDAR SLAM based on directed geometry point and sparse frame. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2020.304320010.1109/LRA.2020.3043200 ↗
44. Lee, S., Lim, H., & Myung, H. (2022). Patchwork++: Fast and robust ground segmentation solving partial under-segmentation using 3D point cloud. 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 13276–13283. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS47612.2022.998156110.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981561 ↗
45. Yao, Z., Zhao, Q., Li, X., & Bi, Q. (2021). Point cloud registration algorithm based on curvature feature similarity. Measurement, 177, Article 109274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10927410.1016/j.measurement.2021.109274 ↗
46. Vallvé, J., Solà, J., & Andrade-Cetto, J. (2019). Pose-graph SLAM sparsification using factor descent. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 119, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2019.06.00410.1016/j.robot.2019.06.004 ↗
47. Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013). Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32(11), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836491349129710.1177/0278364913491297 ↗
48. Chen, X., Milioto, A., Palazzolo, E., Giguere, P., Behley, J., & Stachniss, C. (2019). SuMa++: Efficient LiDAR-based semantic SLAM. 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China, pp. 4530–4537. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS40890.2019.896770410.1109/IROS40890.2019.8967704 ↗