journal article·2008-04

Probabilistic Safety Concept for Fire Safety Engineering based on Natural Fires

Astrid Weilert, Dietmar Hosser, Christoph Klinzmann

Beton- und Stahlbetonbau· Volume 103· Issue S1
Publisher page

Abstract

In Germany the regulations for structural fire protection design are based on the “prescriptive rules” in the building codes of the states. The requirements evolved on the basis of long-term experience and seem to be safe enough. But no homogeneous safety level exists for different types of buildings and occupancies. Therefore a comprehensive and well balanced safety concept is needed which is based on generally accepted safety objectives and performance criteria and which includes the effects of fire protection systems, too. In order to guarantee a required reliability of the design, the stochastic variations of the relevant parameters as well as the availability of the fire protection systems on demand have to be taken into account. Using such kind of probabilistic information, it is possible to analyse alternative fire protection concepts, to determine the resulting reliability and to compare it with the required reliability. As a result appropriate safety formats for the different fire safety verification methods shall be derived in the near future. For structural fire design this safety concept is planned to be included in the national annex to Eurocode 1 part 1-2 and also in the German guideline for fire safety engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fire dynamics and safety research · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · Risk and Safety Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. EN 1991-1-2: Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire, November 2002.
2. Hosser, D., GFPA (Ed.): Guideline on Methods of Fire Safety Engineering, 1st edition, May 2006 (in German: Leitfaden Ingenieurmethoden des Brandschutzes).
3. Competitive Steel Buildings through Natural Fire Safety Concept, Final Report, RPS Report no. 32, CEC-Agreement 7210-SA/125, 126, 213, 214, 323, 423, 522, 623, 839, 937, Profil Arbed, Centre de Recherches, March 1999.
4. EN 1990: Eurocode – Basis of structural design, April 2002.
5. Rahikainen · Fire Technology · 2004 · 40 · 33510.1023/B:FIRE.0000039162.63876.03 ↗
6. Tillander, K. and Keski-Rahkonen, O.: The Ignition Frequency of Structural Fires in Finland 1996–99; Fire Safety Science – Proceedings of the seventh international symposium, 2003, ISBN 0-9545348-0-81051-1062.10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.7-1051 ↗
7. BSI PD 7974-1:2003: Application of fire engineering principles to the design of buildings, Part 1: Initiation and development of fire within the enclosure of origin.
8. CIB W 14 Workshop Report: A Conceptual Approach towards a Probability Based Design Guide on Structural Fire Safety, 1983.
9. Jones, W. W., Peacock, R. D., Forney, G. P. and Reneke, P. A.: CFAST – Consolidated Model of Fire Growth and Smoke Transport (Version 6), Technical Reference Guide, NIST Special Publication 1026, December 2005.10.6028/NIST.SP.1041 ↗
10. Zehfuß · Fire Safety Journal · 2007 · 42 · 11510.1016/j.firesaf.2006.08.004 ↗
11. Klinzmann, C.: MCSim, iBMB, Braunschweig, unpublished internal report.
12. Hosser, D., Kampmeier, B. and Zehfuß, J.: Überprüfung der Anwendbarkeit von alternativen Ansätzen nach Eurocode 1 Teil 1–2 zur Festlegung von Brandschutzanforderungen bei Gebäuden, Abschlussbericht im Auftrag des DIBt, Berlin, Az. ZP 52-5-3.83-1041/03 Dezember 2004.
13. EN 1993-1-2:2005-1; Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1.2 : General rules – structural fire design, January 2005.
14. STRUREL, a Structural Reliability Analysis Program-System: COMREL & SYSREL, RCP GmbH, Munich, 2007.