Bayesian network for risk‐informed inspection planning in ships
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We present the development of a Bayesian Network (BN) model for risk assessment of ships to facilitate risk‐informed inspection planning. The BN consists of four sub‐modules: cause, vulnerability, consequence and inspection. These modules are set up in a generic manner by consideration of readily available information (the indicators), such as ship type, ship size, operational conditions. On this basis, we define representative models of the ship and its components, which are parameterized by the indicators and quantities that can be related to the indicators. The generic approach enables a fast and holistic risk assessment of a larger number of ships even if only limited information is available. The BN approach facilitates the straightforward inclusion of new information, e.g. from inspection and monitoring. It has the additional advantage of allowing easier communication of the model to non‐experts. Through numerical applications, we demonstrate how the calculated risks can be used to prioritize inspections and how new information can be incorporated to update risk estimates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Risk and Safety Analysis · Maritime Navigation and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technische Universität München Engineering Risk Analysis (ERA) Group Arcisstr. 21 80290 München Germany
DNV GL SE Brooktorkai 18 20457 Hamburg Germany
National Technical University of Athens 9 Iroon Polytechniou st. Zografou 15773 Hellas
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Ayyub B.M.;Akpan U.O.;De Souza G.F.;Koto T.S.;Luo X.:Risk‐based life cycle management of ship structures. SR‐1407 Ship Structures Committee Washington DC.2000.
2. Sindel R.;Rackwitz R.:Calculation of the failure probability and inspection optimization for cracks in ships.Technische Universität München Institut für Tragwerksbau.1996.
3. Nielsen T. D. · 2009
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000017310.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000173 ↗
5. Kjærulff U. B. · 2013
6. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.05.00110.1016/j.marstruc.2012.05.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.02010.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.020 ↗
8. IACS: Rec. 55 GENERAL CARGO SHIPS – Guidelines For Surveys Assessment and Repair of Hull Structure.International Association of Classification Societies London.1999.
9. Kähler N.;Hamann H.;Valkonen J.;Ventikos N.P.;Sotiralis P.:SAFEPEC Report – Deliverable 5.1 Development of the Cause module.2016.
10. Studies on the Generation and Progression of Corrosion in Structural Hull Members
11. IACS: Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers.International Association of Classification Societies.2015.
12. 10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
13. DNV GL: RP‐C210: Probabilistic methods for planning of inspection for fatigue cracks in offshore structures.Det Norske Veritas Germanischer Lloyd.2015.
14. British Standards: BS 7910: Guide on methods of assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures.2005.
15. 10.5957/JOSR.57.1.11002810.5957/JOSR.57.1.110028 ↗
16. Ventikos N.P. · 2016
17. 10.1115/1.403539910.1115/1.4035399 ↗