Numerical Simulation of Flapping Wing MAVs in V-formation
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to understand the aerodynamics of Flapping wing Micro Aerial Vehicles (FMAVs) flying in V-formation and how V-formation can improve the endurance of FMAVs. We tested FMAVs with two types of flapping kinematics: (1) idealized sinusoidal flapping/pitching motion, (2) actual FMAV wing deformation capture. Using the design of experiment methodology, together with an immersed boundary method numerical solver, we investigate the effects of phase angle and x, y, z separation between the wings on the FMAVs’ performance. Results show that it is possible to obtain an overall thrust and lift improvement of up to 25% and 14% respectively, or a reduction of both 19%, compared to the single wing configuration. Lastly, for certain cases, we extend another row, leading to a total of five wings. Results show that in general, the additional thrust or lift experienced by the second row of wings is also experienced by the third row of wings. Hence, this may apply to subsequent rows too.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Micro and Nano Robotics · Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Shyy W, Lian Y, Tang J, Liu H, Trizila P, Stanford B, Bernal L, Cesnik C, Friedmann P, Ifju P. Computational aerodynamics of low reynolds number plunging, pitching and flexible wings for MAV applications. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, USA, 2008, 1–33.
2. Lissaman P B, Shollenberger C A. Formation flight of birds. Science, 1970, 168, 1003–1005.10.1126/science.168.3934.1003 ↗
3. Weimerskirch H, Martin J, Clerquin Y, Alexandre P, Jiraskova S. Energy saving in flight formation. Nature, 2001, 413, 697–698.10.1038/35099670 ↗
4. Willis D, Peraire J, Breuer K. A computational investigation of bio-inspired formation flight and ground effect. Proceedings of the 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Reston, USA, 2007, 1–35.
5. Cutts C, Speakman J. Energy savings in formation flight of pink-footed geese. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 1994, 189, 251–252.10.1242/jeb.189.1.251 ↗
6. Ghommem M, Calo V M. Performance analysis of flapping wings in formation flights. Proceedings of the 2nd ECCOMAS Young Investigators Conference, Bordeaux, France, 2013.
7. Portugal S J, Hubel T Y, Fritz J, Heese S, Trobe D, Voelkl B, Hailes S, Wilson A M, Usherwood J R. Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight. Nature, 2014, 505, 399–402.10.1038/nature12939 ↗
8. De Clercq K M E, de Kat R, Remes B, van Oudheusden B W, Bijl H. Aerodynamic experiments on Delfly II: Unsteady lift enhancement. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 2009, 1, 255–262.10.1260/175682909790291465 ↗
9. Nguyen Q V, Chan W L, Debiasi M. Design, fabrication, and performance test of a hovering-based flapping-wing micro air vehicle capable of sustained and controlled flight. Proceedings of the International Micro Air Vehicle Conference and Competitions, Delft, The Netherlands, 2014.
10. Yang J, Balaras E. An embedded-boundary formulation for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows interacting with moving boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 215, 12–40.10.1016/j.jcp.2005.10.035 ↗
11. Kim J, Kim D, Choi H. An immersed-boundary finite-volume method for simulations of flow in complex geometries. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 171, 132–150.10.1006/jcph.2001.6778 ↗
12. Liao C C, Chang Y W, Lin C A, McDonough J M. Simulating flows with moving rigid boundary using immersed-boundary method. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 39, 152–167.10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.07.011 ↗
13. Tay W B, Deng S, van Oudheusden B W, Bijl H. Validation of immersed boundary method for the numerical simulation of flapping wing flight. Computers & Fluids, 2015, 115, 226–242.10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.04.009 ↗
14. Kim D, Choi H. A second-order time-accurate finite volume method for unsteady incompressible flow on hybrid unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 162, 411–428.10.1006/jcph.2000.6546 ↗
15. Balay S, Gropp W D, McInnes L C, Smith B F. Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. In: Arge E, Bruaset A M, Langtangen H P, eds., Modern Software Tools for Scientific Computing, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, USA, 1997, 163–202.10.1007/978-1-4612-1986-6_8 ↗
16. Falgout R D, Jones J E, Yang U M. The design and implementation of hypre, a library of parallel high performance preconditioners. In: Bruaset A M, Tveito A, eds., Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations on Parallel Computers. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, 51, 267–294.10.1007/3-540-31619-1_8 ↗
17. Calderon D E, Wang Z, Gursul I. Lift enhancement of a rectangular wing undergoing a small amplitude plunging motion. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, USA, 2010, 1–18.
18. Lua K B, Lim T T, Yeo K S. Scaling of aerodynamic forces of three-dimensional flapping wings. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52, 1095–1101.10.2514/1.J052730 ↗
19. Nguyen Q V, Chan W L, Debiasi M. Hybrid design and performance tests of a hovering insect-inspired flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 235–248.10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60297-4 ↗
20. Tay W B, van Oudheusden B W, Bijl H. Numerical simulation of a flapping four-wing micro-aerial vehicle. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2015, 55, 237–261.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.03.003 ↗
21. Cheng K S. Study on the Effect of Changing Flapping Wing Kinematics by Means of Changing Wing Root Chord Angle, Final year project, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2015.
22. Anderson M J, Whitcomb P J. DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation, 3rd ed, CRC Press, New York, USA, 2015.10.1201/b18479 ↗
23. Da Ronch A, Ghoreyshi M, Badcock K J. On the generation of flight dynamics aerodynamic tables by computational fluid dynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2011, 47, 597–620.10.1016/j.paerosci.2011.09.001 ↗
24. Da Ronch A, Panzeri M, Bari M A A, D’Ippolito R, Franciolini M. Adaptive design of experiments for efficient and accurate estimation of aerodynamic loads. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2017, 89, 558–569.10.1108/AEAT-10-2016-0173 ↗
25. Minitab Support, [2017-01-21], https://doi.org/www.minitab.com/en-us/support/
26. Tay W B, Bijl H, van Oudheusden B W. Biplane and tail effects in flapping flight. AIAA Journal, 2013, 51, 2133–2146.10.2514/1.J052007 ↗
27. Hunt J C R, Wray A A, P. Moin. Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Proceedings of the Summer Program, Moffett Field, USA, 1988, 193–208.
28. Lim K B, Tay W B. Numerical analysis of the s1020 airfoils in tandem under different flapping configurations. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2009, 26, 191–207.10.1007/s10409-009-0302-2 ↗
29. Lee J, Kim J, Choi H, Yang K S. Sources of spurious force oscillations from an immersed boundary method for moving-body problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 2011, 230, 2677–2695.10.1016/j.jcp.2011.01.004 ↗
30. Hedrick T L. Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3, 034001.10.1088/1748-3182/3/3/034001 ↗