A Novel Three-Dimensional-Printed Polycaprolactone/Nanohydroxyapatite-Nanoclay Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Bigham, A., Aghajanian, A. H., Saudi, A., & Rafienia, M. (2020). Hierarchical porous Mg2SiO4–CoFe2O4 nanomagnetic scaffold for bone cancer therapy and regeneration: Surface modification and in vitro studies. Materials Science and Engineering: C,109, 110579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11057910.1016/j.msec.2019.110579 ↗
2. Sattary, M., Kefayat, A., Bigham, A., & Rafienia, M. (2022). Polycaprolactone/gelatin/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold seeded with stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth to enhance bone repair: In vitro and in vivo studies. Materials Technology,37(5), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2020.183748810.1080/10667857.2020.1837488 ↗
3. Babaei, M., Jamshidi, N., Amiri, F., & Rafienia, M. (2022). Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation on cell seeded 3D hybrid scaffold as a novel strategy for meniscus regeneration: An in vitro study. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine,16(9), 812–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.333110.1002/term.3331 ↗
4. Ghassemi, T., Shahroodi, A., Ebrahimzadeh, M. H., Mousavian, A., Movaffagh, J., & Moradi, A. (2018). Current concepts in scaffolding for bone tissue engineering. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery,6(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.22038/abjs.2018.26340.171310.22038/abjs.2018.26340.1713 ↗
5. Cakmak, A. M., Unal, S., Sahin, A., Oktar, F. N., Sengor, M., Ekren, N., Gunduz, O., & Kalaskar, D. M. (2020). 3D printed polycaprolactone/gelatin/bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Polymers,12(9), 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1209196210.3390/polym12091962 ↗
6. Li, P., Ruan, L., Wang, R., Liu, T., Song, G., Gao, X., Jiang, G., & Liu, X. (2021). Electrospun scaffold of collagen and polycaprolactone containing ZnO quantum dots for skin wound regeneration. Journal of Bionic Engineering,18, 1378–1390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-00115-710.1007/s42235-021-00115-7 ↗
7. Mehdikhani, M., Yilgör, P., Poursamar, S. A., Etemadi, N., Gokyer, S., Navid, S., Farzan, M., Farzan, M., Babaei, M., & Rafienia, M. (2024). A hybrid 3D-printed and electrospun bilayer pharmaceutical membrane based on polycaprolactone/chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol for wound healing applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,282, 136692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13669210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136692 ↗
8. Kazemi, M., Mirzadeh, M., Esmaeili, H., Kazemi, E., Rafienia, M., & Poursamar, S. A. (2024). Evaluation of the morphological effects of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on the rheological properties and printability of hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone nanocomposite inks and final scaffold features. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing,11(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2021.029210.1089/3dp.2021.0292 ↗
9. Shi, H., Zhou, Z., Li, W., Fan, Y., Li, Z., & Wei, J. (2021). Hydroxyapatite based materials for bone tissue engineering: A brief and comprehensive introduction. Crystals,11(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1102014910.3390/cryst11020149 ↗
10. Babaei, M., Ebrahim-Najafabadi, N., Mirzadeh, M., Abdali, H., Farnaghi, M., Gharavi, M. K., Kheradmandfard, M., Kharazi, A. Z., & Poursamar, S. A. (2024). A comprehensive bench-to-bed look into the application of gamma-sterilized 3D-printed polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite implants for craniomaxillofacial defects, an in vitro, in vivo, and clinical study. Biomaterials Advances,161, 213900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.21390010.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213900 ↗
11. Wu, M., Chen, F., Wu, P., Yang, Z., Zhang, S., Xiao, L., Deng, Z., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., & Cai, L. (2021). Nanoclay mineral-reinforced macroporous nanocomposite scaffolds for in situ bone regeneration: In vitro and in vivo studies. Materials & Design,205, 109734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10973410.1016/j.matdes.2021.109734 ↗
12. Amiri, F., Babaei, M., Jamshidi, N., Agheb, M., Rafienia, M., & Kazemi, M. (2022). Fabrication and assessment of a novel hybrid scaffold consisted of polyurethane-gellan gum-hyaluronic acid-glucosamine for meniscus tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,203, 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.09110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.091 ↗
13. Wang, C., Huang, W., Zhou, Y., He, L., He, Z., Chen, Z., He, X., Tian, S., Liao, J., & Lu, B. (2020). 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioactive Materials,5(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.00410.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004 ↗
14. Zhang, B., Pei, X., Song, P., Sun, H., Li, H., Fan, Y., Jiang, Q., Zhou, C., & Zhang, X. (2018). Porous bioceramics produced by inkjet 3D printing: Effect of printing ink formulation on the ceramic macro and micro porous architectures control. Composites Part B: Engineering,155, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.047 ↗
15. Sultana, T., Rana, M., Akhtar, M., Hasan, Z., Talukder, A., & Aseduzzaman, S. (2017). Preparation and physicochemical characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite based 3D porous scaffold for biomedical application. Advances in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine,3(3), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.15406/atroa.2017.03.0006510.15406/atroa.2017.03.00065 ↗
16. Ganesh, M., Aziz, A. S., Ubaidulla, U., Hemalatha, P., Saravanakumar, A., Ravikumar, R., Peng, M. M., Choi, E. Y., & Jang, H. T. (2016). Sulfanilamide and silver nanoparticles-loaded polyvinyl alcohol-chitosan composite electrospun nanofibers: Synthesis and evaluation on synergism in wound healing. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,39, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.05.02110.1016/j.jiec.2016.05.021 ↗
17. Kokubo, T., & Takadama, H. (2006). How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials,27(15), 2907–2915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
18. Zhou, X., Pan, Y., Liu, R., Luo, X., Zeng, X., Zhi, D., Li, J., Cheng, Q., Huang, Z., & Zhang, H. (2019). Biocompatibility and biodegradation properties of polycaprolactone/polydioxanone composite scaffolds prepared by blend or co-electrospinning. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers,34(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/088391151983556910.1177/0883911519835569 ↗
19. Wandiyanto, J. V., Truong, V. K., Al Kobaisi, M., Juodkazis, S., Thissen, H., Bazaka, O., Bazaka, K., Crawford, R. J., & Ivanova, E. P. (2019). The fate of osteoblast-like MG-63 cells on pre-infected bactericidal nanostructured titanium surfaces. Materials,12(10), 1575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1210157510.3390/ma12101575 ↗
20. Chen, G., & Kawazoe, N. (2016). Preparation of polymer scaffolds by ice particulate method for tissue engineering. Biomaterials nanoarchitectonics (pp. 77–95). William Andrew Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-323-37127-8.00006-6 ↗
21. Sun, J., Vijayavenkataraman, S., & Liu, H. (2017). An overview of scaffold design and fabrication technology for engineered knee meniscus. Materials,10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1001002910.3390/ma10010029 ↗
22. Alexa, R. L., Iovu, H., Trica, B., Zaharia, C., Serafim, A., Alexandrescu, E., Radu, I.-C., Vlasceanu, G., Preda, S., & Ninciuleanu, C. M. (2021). Assessment of naturally sourced mineral clays for the 3D printing of biopolymer-based nanocomposite inks. Nanomaterials,11(3), 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1103070310.3390/nano11030703 ↗
23. Sandri, G., Faccendini, A., Longo, M., Ruggeri, M., Rossi, S., Bonferoni, M. C., Miele, D., Prina-Mello, A., Aguzzi, C., & Viseras, C. (2020). Halloysite-and montmorillonite-loaded scaffolds as enhancers of chronic wound healing. Pharmaceutics,12(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics1202017910.3390/pharmaceutics12020179 ↗
24. Friedrich, L. M., & Seppala, J. E. (2021). Simulated filament shapes in embedded 3D printing. Soft Matter,17(35), 8027–8046. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM00731A10.1039/D1SM00731A ↗
25. Aydin, E. M., Kara, B., Bundur, Z. B., Ozyurt, N., Bebek, O., & Gulgun, M. A. (2022). A comparative evaluation of sepiolite and nano-montmorillonite on the rheology of cementitious materials for 3D printing. Construction and Building Materials,350, 128935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12893510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128935 ↗
26. Gao, Q., Niu, X., Shao, L., Zhou, L., Lin, Z., Sun, A., Fu, J., Chen, Z., Hu, J., & Liu, Y. (2019). 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay. Biofabrication,11(3), 035006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf610.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6 ↗
27. Ianchis, R., Marin, M. M., Alexa, R. L., Gifu, I. C., Alexandrescu, E., Pircalabioru, G. G., Vlasceanu, G. M., Teodorescu, G. M., Serafim, A., & Preda, S. (2023). Nanoclay-reinforced alginate/salecan composite inks for 3D printing applications. International Journal of Bioprinting,10(1), 0967. https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.096710.36922/ijb.0967 ↗
28. Murphy, C. M., & O’Brien, F. J. (2010). Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adhesion & Migration,4(3), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.4.3.1174710.4161/cam.4.3.11747 ↗
29. Shanthi, P. M. S., Ashok, M., Balasubramanian, T., Riyasdeen, A., & Akbarsha, M. (2009). Synthesis and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite at ambient temperature using cationic surfactant. Materials Letters,63(24–25), 2123–2125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2009.07.00810.1016/j.matlet.2009.07.008 ↗
30. Yu, C., Ke, Y., Hu, X., Zhao, Y., Deng, Q., & Lu, S. (2019). Effect of bifunctional montmorillonite on the thermal and tribological properties of polystyrene/montmorillonite nanocomposites. Polymers,11(5), 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1105083410.3390/polym11050834 ↗
31. Baghbadorani, M. A., Bigham, A., Rafienia, M., & Salehi, H. (2021). A ternary nanocomposite fibrous scaffold composed of poly (ε-caprolactone)/gelatin/gehlenite (Ca2Al2SiO7): Physical, chemical, and biological properties in vitro. Polymers for Advanced Technologies,32(2), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.511310.1002/pat.5113 ↗
32. Ji, Y., Liang, K., Shen, X., & Bowlin, G. L. (2014). Electrospinning and characterization of chitin nanofibril/polycaprolactone nanocomposite fiber mats. Carbohydrate Polymers,101, 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.01210.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.012 ↗
33. Sattary, M., Khorasani, M. T., Rafienia, M., & Rozve, H. S. (2018). Incorporation of nanohydroxyapatite and vitamin D3 into electrospun PCL/gelatin scaffolds: The influence on the physical and chemical properties and cell behavior for bone tissue engineering. Polymers for Advanced Technologies,29(1), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.413410.1002/pat.4134 ↗
34. Khodamoradi, N., Babaeipour, V., & Sirousazar, M. (2019). Bacterial cellulose/montmorillonite bionanocomposites prepared by immersion and in-situ methods: Structural, mechanical, thermal, swelling and dehydration properties. Cellulose,26(13), 7847–7861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02666-910.1007/s10570-019-02666-9 ↗
35. Li, D., Li, P., Xu, Y., Guo, W., Li, M., Chen, M., Wang, H., & Lin, H. (2022). Progress in montmorillonite functionalized artificial bone scaffolds: Intercalation and interlocking, nanoenhancement, and controlled drug release. Journal of Nanomaterials,2022(1), 7900382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/790038210.1155/2022/7900382 ↗
36. Yazdanpanah, Z., Johnston, J. D., Cooper, D. M., & Chen, X. (2022). 3D bioprinted scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State-of-the-art and emerging technologies. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,10, 824156. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.82415610.3389/fbioe.2022.824156 ↗
37. Bossard, C., Granel, H., Wittrant, Y., Jallot, É., Lao, J., Vial, C., & Tiainen, H. (2018). Polycaprolactone/bioactive glass hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomedical Glasses,4(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/bglass-2018-001010.1515/bglass-2018-0010 ↗
38. Yazdanpanah, Z., Sharma, N. K., Raquin, A., Cooper, D. M., Chen, X., & Johnston, J. D. (2023). Printing tissue-engineered scaffolds made of polycaprolactone and nano-hydroxyapatite with mechanical properties appropriate for trabecular bone substitutes. Biomedical Engineering Online,22(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01135-610.1186/s12938-023-01135-6 ↗
39. Jahir-Hussain, M. J., Maaruf, N. A., Esa, N. E. F., & Jusoh, N. (2021). The effect of pore geometry on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed bone scaffold due to compressive loading. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,1051(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/01201610.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012016 ↗
40. Karimi, M., Asadi-Eydivand, M., Abolfathi, N., Chehrehsaz, Y., & Solati-Hashjin, M. (2023). The effect of pore size and layout on mechanical and biological properties of 3D-printed bone scaffolds with gradient porosity. Polymer Composites,44(2), 1343–1359. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2717410.1002/pc.27174 ↗
41. Abulyazied, D. E., & Ene, A. (2021). An investigative study on the progress of nanoclay-reinforced polymers: Preparation, properties, and applications: A review. Polymers,13(24), 4401. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1324440110.3390/polym13244401 ↗
42. Rezapourian, M., Kamboj, N., Jasiuk, I., & Hussainova, I. (2022). Biomimetic design of implants for long bone critical-sized defects. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10537010.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105370 ↗
43. Xu, W., Lu, X., Hayat, M. D., Tian, J., Huang, C., Chen, M., Qu, X., & Wen, C. (2019). Fabrication and properties of newly developed Ti35Zr28Nb scaffolds fabricated by powder metallurgy for bone-tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Research and Technology,8(5), 3696–3704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.02110.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.021 ↗
44. Liao, C., Li, Y., & Tjong, S. C. (2020). Polyetheretherketone and its composites for bone replacement and regeneration. Polymers,12(12), 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1212285810.3390/polym12122858 ↗
45. Zimina, A., Senatov, F., Choudhary, R., Kolesnikov, E., Anisimova, N., Kiselevskiy, M., Orlova, P., Strukova, N., Generalova, M., & Manskikh, V. (2020). Biocompatibility and physico-chemical properties of highly porous PLA/HA scaffolds for bone reconstruction. Polymers,12(12), 2938. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1212293810.3390/polym12122938 ↗
46. Guy, O. J., & Walker, K.-A.D. (2016). Silicon carbide biotechnology. Chapter 4-graphene functionalization for biosensor applications (pp. 85–141). Elsevier.
47. Karizmeh, M. S., Poursamar, S. A., Kefayat, A., Farahbakhsh, Z., & Rafienia, M. (2022). An in vitro and in vivo study of PCL/chitosan electrospun mat on polyurethane/propolis foam as a bilayer wound dressing. Biomaterials Advances,135, 112667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2022.11266710.1016/j.msec.2022.112667 ↗
48. Nitya, G., Nair, G. T., Mony, U., Chennazhi, K. P., & Nair, S. V. (2012). In vitro evaluation of electrospun PCL/nanoclay composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine,23, 1749–1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4647-x10.1007/s10856-012-4647-x ↗
49. Rajzer, I. (2014). Fabrication of bioactive polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffolds with final bilayer nano-/micro-fibrous structures for tissue engineering application. Journal of Materials Science,49, 5799–5807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8311-310.1007/s10853-014-8311-3 ↗
50. Xia, Y., Zhou, P., Cheng, X., Xie, Y., Liang, C., Li, C., & Xu, S. (2013). Selective laser sintering fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. International Journal of Nanomedicine,8, 4197–4213. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S5068510.2147/IJN.S50685 ↗
51. An, J. H., & Kim, H. Y. (2024). Scaffolds bioink for 3D bioprinting. Food Science of Animal Resources,45(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2024.e12010.5851/kosfa.2024.e120 ↗
52. Dana, K., & Sarkar, M. (2020). Organophilic nature of nanoclay. Clay nanoparticles (pp. 117–138). Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-816783-0.00005-0 ↗
53. Trakoolwannachai, V., Kheolamai, P., & Ummartyotin, S. (2019). Characterization of hydroxyapatite from eggshell waste and polycaprolactone (PCL) composite for scaffold material. Composites Part B: Engineering,173, 106974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10697410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106974 ↗
54. Li, B., Ren, K., Wang, Y., Qi, Y., Chen, X., & Huang, Y. (2016). Protein-cross-linked hydrogels with tailored swelling and bioactivity performance: A comparative study. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,8(45), 30788–30796. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b1128710.1021/acsami.6b11287 ↗
55. Zadehnajar, P., Akbari, B., Karbasi, S., & Mirmusavi, M. H. (2020). Preparation and characterization of poly ε-caprolactone-gelatin/multi-walled carbon nanotubes electrospun scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering applications. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials,69(5), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2018.156308810.1080/00914037.2018.1563088 ↗
56. Gaharwar, A. K., Mukundan, S., Karaca, E., Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A., Patel, A., Rangarajan, K., Mihaila, S. M., Iviglia, G., Zhang, H., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014). Nanoclay-enriched poly (ɛ-caprolactone) electrospun scaffolds for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Engineering Part A,20(15–16), 2088–2101. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2013.02810.1089/ten.tea.2013.028 ↗
57. Naga, S., Mahmoud, E., El-Maghraby, H., El-Kady, A. M., Arbid, M., Killinger, A., & Gadow, R. (2018). Porous scaffolds based on biogenic poly (ε-caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite composites: In vivo study. Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,9(4), 045004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/aae9f710.1088/2043-6254/aae9f7 ↗
58. Olad, A., & Azhar, F. F. (2014). The synergetic effect of bioactive ceramic and nanoclay on the properties of chitosan–gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite–montmorillonite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Ceramics International,40(7), 10061–10072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.01010.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.010 ↗
59. Mousa, M., Evans, N. D., Oreffo, R. O., & Dawson, J. I. (2018). Clay nanoparticles for regenerative medicine and biomaterial design: A review of clay bioactivity. Biomaterials,159, 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.024 ↗
60. Aktug, S. L., Durdu, S., Aktas, S., Yalcin, E., & Usta, M. (2019). Surface and in vitro properties of Ag-deposited antibacterial and bioactive coatings on AZ31 Mg alloy. Surface and Coatings Technology,375, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.01310.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.013 ↗
61. Polo-Corrales, L., Latorre-Esteves, M., & Ramirez-Vick, J. E. (2014). Scaffold design for bone regeneration. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,14(1), 15–56. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.912710.1166/jnn.2014.9127 ↗
62. Mirmusavi, M. H., Ahmadian, M., & Karbasi, S. (2022). Polycaprolactone-chitosan/multi-walled carbon nanotube: A highly strengthened electrospun nanocomposite scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,209, 1801–1814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.15210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.152 ↗
63. Zhang, Q., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y., Ye, Z., Tan, W., & Lang, M. (2013). Effect of porosity on long-term degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds and their cellular response. Polymer Degradation and Stability,98(1), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMDEGRADSTAB.2012.10.00810.1016/J.POLYMDEGRADSTAB.2012.10.008 ↗
64. Azari, P., Hosseini, S., Murphy, B. P., & Martinez-Chapa, S. O. (2018). Electrospun biopolyesters: Hydrophobic scaffolds with favorable biological response. Journal of Public Health International,1, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-18-197510.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-18-1975 ↗
65. Fathi, M., Hanifi, A., & Mortazavi, V. (2008). Preparation and bioactivity evaluation of bone-like hydroxyapatite nanopowder. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,202(1–3), 536–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.00410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.004 ↗
66. Eskandarinia, A., Kefayat, A., Gharakhloo, M., Agheb, M., Khodabakhshi, D., Khorshidi, M., Sheikhmoradi, V., Rafienia, M., & Salehi, H. (2020). A propolis enriched polyurethane-hyaluronic acid nanofibrous wound dressing with remarkable antibacterial and wound healing activities. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,149, 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.25510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.255 ↗
67. Bekaroğlu, G. M., & İşçi, S. (2022). Raw and purified clay minerals for drug delivery applications. ACS Omega,7(43), 38825–38831. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0451010.1021/acsomega.2c04510 ↗
68. Huang, Y., Dan, N., Dan, W., & Zhao, W. (2019). Reinforcement of polycaprolactone/chitosan with nanoclay and controlled release of curcumin for wound dressing. ACS Omega,4(27), 22292–22301. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b0221710.1021/acsomega.9b02217 ↗
69. Jaiswal, A., Chhabra, H., Soni, V., & Bellare, J. (2013). Enhanced mechanical strength and biocompatibility of electrospun polycaprolactone-gelatin scaffold with surface deposited nano-hydroxyapatite. Materials Science and Engineering: C,33(4), 2376–2385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.02.00310.1016/j.msec.2013.02.003 ↗
70. Sato, M., Aslani, A., Sambito, M. A., Kalkhoran, N. M., Slamovich, E. B., & Webster, T. J. (2008). Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite/titania coatings on titanium improves osteoblast adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A,84(1), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3146910.1002/jbm.a.31469 ↗
71. Hynes, R. O. (2002). Integrins: Bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell,110(6), 673–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00971-610.1016/S0092-8674(02)00971-6 ↗