journal article·2018-09

Structural safety referring to ultrasound on concrete bridges

Stefan Küttenbaum, Stefan Maack, Alexander Taffe

Beton- und Stahlbetonbau· Volume 113· Issue S2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Measuring means knowing. The structural engineer's knowledge about structures is vitally important for the assessment of their structural safety. This contribution shows, how non‐destructive testing methods can be used to collect valuable information about existing structures. This value is expressed in this paper by the usability in probabilistic assessments and thus by the reliability of the information. The development of non‐destructive testing methods in civil‐engineering allows the realistic measurement and visualization of inner constructions of concrete components with a minimum of destructive interventions. The evaluation of the quality of measurement data is of fundamental importance for quantitative measurements in order to ensure the objectivity of testing and evaluation and to assess the reliability of the knowledge acquired. Both systematic and random deviations must be identified, quantified and taken into account to obtain statistically sound data. The focus of this contribution is on the methodical path, how displayed measurement data can be processed into reliable knowledge. It is not about developing assessment methods but about providing necessary knowledge to increase their operational usability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Civil and Structural Engineering Research · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und prüfung (BAM) Division 8.2 Unter den Eichen 87 12205 Berlin

HTW Berlin – University of Applied Sciences Wilhelminenhofstraße 75a 12459 Berlin

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. JCGM 100:2008. Evaluation of measurement data ― Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement(2008).
2. Federal Ministry of Transport Building and Urban Development:Richtlinie zur Nachrechnung von Straßenbrücken im Bestand (2011) and 1st supplement(2015).
3. Zur Validierung quantitativer zerstörungsfreier Prüfverfahren im Stahlbetonbau am Beispiel der Laufzeitmessung
4. ENIQ Report nr. 31: European methodology for qualification of non‐destructive testing. EUR 22906 EN.Luxembourg(2007).
5. 10.2749/101686613X1362735108155110.2749/101686613X13627351081551 ↗
6. 10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S0610.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S06 ↗
7. Krystek M. · 2015
8. JCGM 200:2012: International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM).3rd edition (2012).
9. Hässelbarth W. · 2006
10. DIN 12504‐4:2004‐12: Testing concrete in structures – Part 4: Determination of ultrasonic pulse velocity; German version EN 12504‐4 Berlin.
11. Landau L. D. · 1989
12. Verwendung von Messergebnissen zerstörungsfreier Prüfverfahren im Bauwesen in statischen Nachweisen
13. Maack S;Diersch N.:Einsatz von zerstörungsfreien Prüfverfahren (ZfP‐Verfahren) zur Rekonstruktion von Bestandsplänen als Grundlage für die Nachrechnung. Schlussbericht FE 29.0333/2013/BASt. self‐published Berlin(2015).