journal article·2023-04Open access

The optimization of PLGA knitted mesh reinforced‐collagen/chitosan scaffold for the healing of full‐thickness skin defects

Xuanliang Pan, Chuangang You, Pan Wu, Xingang Wang, Chunmao Han

Abstract

Abstract Collagen‐based scaffolds reveals promising to repair severe skin defects. The mechanical strength of collagen‐based scaffold (CCS) limited its clinical application. Embedding poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic) acid (PLGA) knitted mesh into CCS improves the mechanical strength of the scaffold. This study was conducted to optimize the configuration of PLGA knitted mesh‐collagen‐chitosan scaffold (PCCS), and explore possible mechanisms. PLGA knitted mesh was embedded in CCS through freeze‐drying method. With the PLGA knitted mesh located at the bottom, middle, or both bottom and top layers of the CCS, three kinds of PCCS were developed. A full‐thickness skin wound model was established in Sprague Dawley rats to evaluate the therapeutic effects of different PCCS against CCS. The properties and healing effect of the scaffolds were investigated. Several growth factors and chemotactic factors, that is, VEGF, PDGF, CD31, α‐SMA, TGF‐β1, and TGF‐β3 were analyzed and evaluated. Re‐epithelialization and angiogenesis were observed in all animal groups with the treatment of three kinds of PCCS scaffolds and the CCS scaffold (control). The protein and gene expression of VEGF, PDGF, CD31, α‐SMA, TGF‐β1, and TGF‐β3 showed different dynamics at different time points. Based on the healing effects and the expression of growth factors and chemotactic factors, scaffold with the PLGA knitted mesh located at the bottom layer of the CCS demonstrated the best healing effect and accelerated re‐epithelialization and angiogenesis among all the scaffolds evaluated. PCCS with the PLGA mesh located in the bottom layer of the scaffold accelerated wound healing by creating a more supportive environment for re‐epithelialization and angiogenesis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Burns and Wound Repair The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou People's Republic of China

Key Laboratory of The Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Trauma and Burn of Zhejiang Province Hangzhou People's Republic of China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.12659/MSM.91005910.12659/MSM.910059 ↗
2. 10.1186/s12917-020-02566-210.1186/s12917-020-02566-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.10885810.1016/j.biopha.2019.108858 ↗
4. 10.1111/joa.1278410.1111/joa.12784 ↗
5. 10.1186/s13287-019-1389-410.1186/s13287-019-1389-4 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jdcr.2018.03.01510.1016/j.jdcr.2018.03.015 ↗
7. Efficacy of a nanofabricated electrospun wound matrix in treating full‐thickness cutaneous wounds in a porcine model
8. 10.3390/mi1102022710.3390/mi11020227 ↗
9. 10.3390/polym1209201010.3390/polym12092010 ↗
10. 10.1155/2015/82127910.1155/2015/821279 ↗
11. 10.3390/ijms1712197410.3390/ijms17121974 ↗
12. 10.1089/ten.tec.2017.018510.1089/ten.tec.2017.0185 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.00410.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.004 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1110167910.3390/polym11101679 ↗
15. 10.1177/030006052094550810.1177/0300060520945508 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.05810.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.058 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.12.00210.1016/j.jtv.2020.12.002 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1210231110.3390/polym12102311 ↗
19. 10.1002/term.294610.1002/term.2946 ↗
20. 10.1089/wound.2014.059510.1089/wound.2014.0595 ↗
21. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.000710.1089/ten.tea.2007.0007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.01710.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.02110.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.021 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41598-017-10481-010.1038/s41598-017-10481-0 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-020-59931-210.1038/s41598-020-59931-2 ↗
27. 10.3390/ijms2020517410.3390/ijms20205174 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11026810.1016/j.msec.2019.110268 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.00910.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.009 ↗
30. 10.1186/1475-925X-12-12510.1186/1475-925X-12-125 ↗
31. 10.3390/md1808041410.3390/md18080414 ↗
32. 10.1155/2017/863989810.1155/2017/8639898 ↗
33. 10.2147/IJN.S21032910.2147/IJN.S210329 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.01710.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.017 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.017 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1205114610.3390/polym12051146 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.10210.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.102 ↗
38. 10.1093/rb/rbx02610.1093/rb/rbx026 ↗
39. 10.7150/thno.3448010.7150/thno.34480 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0440210.1021/acsomega.0c04402 ↗
41. 10.1093/burnst/tkaa02210.1093/burnst/tkaa022 ↗
42. 10.1186/s13287-019-1212-210.1186/s13287-019-1212-2 ↗
43. 10.1159/00037404910.1159/000374049 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.01210.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.012 ↗
45. 10.1371/journal.pone.000122710.1371/journal.pone.0001227 ↗