journal article·2020-07Open access

Investigation of multiphasic 3D‐bioplotted scaffolds for site‐specific chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human adipose‐derived stem cells for osteochondral tissue engineering applications

Liliana F. Mellor, Rachel C. Nordberg, Pedro Huebner, Mahsa Mohiti‐Asli, Michael A. Taylor, William Efird, Julia T. Oxford, Jeffrey T. Spang, Rohan A. Shirwaiker, Elizabeth G. Loboa

Abstract

Abstract Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that limits mobility of the affected joint due to the degradation of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. The limited regenerative capacity of cartilage presents significant challenges when attempting to repair or reverse the effects of cartilage degradation. Tissue engineered medical products are a promising alternative to treat osteochondral degeneration due to their potential to integrate into the patient's existing tissue. The goal of this study was to create a scaffold that would induce site‐specific osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose‐derived stem cells (hASC) to generate a full osteochondral implant. Scaffolds were fabricated using 3D‐bioplotting of biodegradable polycraprolactone (PCL) with either β‐tricalcium phosphate (TCP) or decellularized bovine cartilage extracellular matrix (dECM) to drive site‐specific hASC osteogenesis and chondrogenesis, respectively. PCL‐dECM scaffolds demonstrated elevated matrix deposition and organization in scaffolds seeded with hASC as well as a reduction in collagen I gene expression. 3D‐bioplotted PCL scaffolds with 20% TCP demonstrated elevated calcium deposition, endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity, and osteopontin gene expression. Osteochondral scaffolds comprised of hASC‐seeded 3D‐bioplotted PCL‐TCP, electrospun PCL, and 3D‐bioplotted PCL‐dECM phases were evaluated and demonstrated site‐specific osteochondral tissue characteristics. This technique holds great promise as cartilage morbidity is minimized since autologous cartilage harvest is not required, tissue rejection is minimized via use of an abundant and accessible source of autologous stem cells, and biofabrication techniques allow for a precise, customizable methodology to rapidly produce the scaffold.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Mesenchymal stem cell research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina

Department of Biomedical, Biological and Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering University of Missouri Columbia Missouri

Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina

Department of Orthopaedics University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina

Biomolecular Research Center Boise State University Boise Idaho

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · National Aeronautics and Space Administration · National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering · National Institutes of Health · Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/mabi.20110047010.1002/mabi.201100470 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00167-014-3453-z10.1007/s00167-014-3453-z ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.045 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.00410.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00011-310.1016/S0091-679X(08)00011-3 ↗
6. 10.1371/journal.pone.006255410.1371/journal.pone.0062554 ↗
7. 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.068310.1089/ten.tec.2013.0683 ↗
8. 10.1002/jor.2154110.1002/jor.21541 ↗
9. 10.1302/2046-3758.34.200023810.1302/2046-3758.34.2000238 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.10.00510.1016/j.copbio.2009.10.005 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.400188410.1115/1.4001884 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2011.04.00310.1016/j.cytogfr.2011.04.003 ↗
13. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.2183210.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21832 ↗
14. Current treatment options for the restoration of articular cartilage
15. 10.1016/j.exer.2008.03.01410.1016/j.exer.2008.03.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joca.2010.01.00810.1016/j.joca.2010.01.008 ↗
17. 10.1159/00022598510.1159/000225985 ↗
18. 10.22203/eCM.v019a0810.22203/eCM.v019a08 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.01810.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.018 ↗
20. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.004210.1089/ten.tea.2010.0042 ↗
21. 10.1002/ar.a.2001010.1002/ar.a.20010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.008.110023062110.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.008.1100230621 ↗
23. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000101063.27008.E110.1097/01.PRS.0000101063.27008.E1 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00213-610.1016/S0021-9290(03)00213-6 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10439-010-0038-y10.1007/s10439-010-0038-y ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.10.00710.1016/j.ceb.2006.10.007 ↗
27. 10.1002/jor.2095810.1002/jor.20958 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.injury.2009.11.01410.1016/j.injury.2009.11.014 ↗
29. 10.1002/term.24310.1002/term.243 ↗
30. 10.1002/art.2498410.1002/art.24984 ↗
31. 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.020410.1089/ten.tea.2007.0204 ↗
32. Functional tissue engineering of chondral and osteochondral constructs
33. 10.1006/meth.2001.126210.1006/meth.2001.1262 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10439-010-0046-y10.1007/s10439-010-0046-y ↗
35. 10.1039/C7RA01981E10.1039/C7RA01981E ↗
36. Preparation, characterization, and in vitro osteoblast functions of a nano‐hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone biocomposite as orthopedic implant material
37. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.069110.1089/ten.tea.2009.0691 ↗
38. 10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-003510.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0035 ↗
39. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.285310.1089/ten.2006.12.2853 ↗
40. 10.1155/2017/695679410.1155/2017/6956794 ↗
41. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.057210.1089/ten.tea.2014.0572 ↗
42. Mesenchymal stem cells in connective tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Applications in cartilage repair and osteoarthritis therapy
43. 10.1177/036354650832213110.1177/0363546508322131 ↗
44. 10.5966/sctm.2015-007110.5966/sctm.2015-0071 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.004 ↗
46. 10.1002/jor.110009050410.1002/jor.1100090504 ↗
47. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2938-2_1910.1007/978-1-4939-2938-2_19 ↗
48. 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.070510.1089/ten.teb.2009.0705 ↗
49. 10.1089/ten.teb.2008.018910.1089/ten.teb.2008.0189 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00127-710.1016/S0142-9612(00)00127-7 ↗
51. 10.1089/ten.2006.043710.1089/ten.2006.0437 ↗
52. 10.1089/ten.teb.2013.054310.1089/ten.teb.2013.0543 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.03.01710.1016/j.semcdb.2009.03.017 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.07.01410.1016/j.bioeng.2007.07.014 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.008 ↗
56. Mesenchymal stem cells can survive on the extracellular matrix‐derived decellularized bovine articular cartilage scaffold
57. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.09210.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.092 ↗
58. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00789.x10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00789.x ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matbio.2010.08.00710.1016/j.matbio.2010.08.007 ↗
60. Evaluation of an extracellular matrix‐derived acellular biphasic scaffold/cell construct in the repair of a large articular high‐load‐bearing osteochondral defect in a canine model
61. 10.1002/jbm.a.3535610.1002/jbm.a.35356 ↗
62. 10.1089/10763270130006285910.1089/107632701300062859 ↗