journal article·2020-02Open access

Nanofibrous antibiotic‐eluting matrices: Biocompatibility studies in a rat model

Patrícia C. Passos, Juliana Moro, Raquel Cristine Silva Barcelos, Higor Z. Da Rosa, Luciana T. Vey, Marilise Escobar Bürguer, Roberto M. Maciel, Cristiane C. Danesi, Paul C. Edwards, Marco C. Bottino, Karla Z. Kantorski

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated the biocompatibility of degradable polydioxanone (PDS) electrospun drug delivery systems (hereafter referred as matrices) containing metronidazole (MET) or ciprofloxacin (CIP) after subcutaneous implantation in rats. Sixty adult male rats were randomized into six groups: SHAM (sham surgery); PDS (antibiotic‐free matrix); 1MET (one 25 wt% MET matrix); 1CIP (one 25 wt% CIP matrix); 2MET (two 25 wt% MET matrices); and 2CIP (two 25 wt% CIP matrices). At 3 and 30 days, animals were assessed for inflammatory cell response (ICR), collagen fibers degradation, and oxidative profile (reactive oxygen species [ROS]; lipid peroxidation [LP]; and protein carbonyl [PC]). At 3 days, percentages of no/discrete ICR were 100, 93.3, 86.7, 76.7, 50, and 66.6 for SHAM, PDS, 1MET, 1CIP, 2MET, and 2CIP, respectively. At 30 days, percentages of no/discrete ICR were 100% for SHAM, PDS, 1MET, and 1CIP and 93.3% for 2MET and 2CIP. Between 3 and 30 days, SHAM, 1CIP, and 2CIP produced collagen, while 1MET and 2MET were unchanged. At 30 days, the collagen fiber means percentages for SHAM, PDS, 1MET, 1CIP, 2MET, and 2CIP were 63.7, 60.7, 56.6, 62.6, 51.8, and 61.7, respectively. Antibiotic‐eluting matrices showed similar or better oxidative behavior when compared to PDS, except for CIP‐eluting matrices, which showed higher levels of PC compared to SHAM or PDS at 30 days. Collectively, our findings indicate that antibiotic‐eluting matrices may be an attractive biocompatible drug delivery system to fight periodontopathogens. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B, 2019.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Dental materials and restorations · Oral microbiology and periodontitis research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Post‐Graduate Program in Oral Science (Periodontology Unit), School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) Santa Maria Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

Post‐Graduate Program in Oral Science (Pathology Unit), School of Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) Santa Maria Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

Post‐Graduate Program in Pharmacology Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) Santa Maria Rio Grande do Sul Brazil

Department of Oral Pathology, Medicine and Radiology Indiana University School of Dentistry Indianapolis Indiana

Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor Michigan

Funding

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research · National Institutes of Health

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00425.x10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00425.x ↗
2. 10.1177/002203451455249110.1177/0022034514552491 ↗
3. 10.1111/jcpe.1207510.1111/jcpe.12075 ↗
4. 10.1111/prd.1200310.1111/prd.12003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.00410.1016/j.dental.2015.06.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.12.01110.1016/j.dental.2017.12.011 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.02210.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00854.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00854.x ↗
9. 10.1902/jop.1990.61.11.68010.1902/jop.1990.61.11.680 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.01910.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.019 ↗
11. 10.1111/prd.1205710.1111/prd.12057 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00154.x10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00154.x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.07.01010.1016/j.addr.2016.07.010 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.04.00910.1016/j.jconrel.2004.04.009 ↗
15. 10.1021/bm060057z10.1021/bm060057z ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.07.08110.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.07.081 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.04.026 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00784-015-1671-510.1007/s00784-015-1671-5 ↗
19. 10.1177/002203451350577010.1177/0022034513505770 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00784-014-1201-x10.1007/s00784-014-1201-x ↗
21. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/01500510.1088/1748-6041/7/1/015005 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80236-X10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80236-X ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.b.3309010.1002/jbm.b.33090 ↗
24. 10.1902/jop.2015.15038510.1902/jop.2015.150385 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00061-110.1016/S0891-5849(99)00061-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-610.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 ↗
27. 10.1006/abio.1995.136210.1006/abio.1995.1362 ↗
28. 10.1016/0076-6879(90)86141-H10.1016/0076-6879(90)86141-H ↗
29. 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-310.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3 ↗
30. 10.1128/AAC.50.2.428-438.200610.1128/AAC.50.2.428-438.2006 ↗
31. 10.1208/s12248-012-9367-010.1208/s12248-012-9367-0 ↗
32. 10.1023/A:101304691819010.1023/A:1013046918190 ↗