journal article·2023-03

Fabrication and histological evaluation of ant‐nest type porous carbonate apatite artificial bone using polyurethane foam as a porogen

Janice Lay Tin Tan, Masaya Shimabukuro, Ryo Kishida, Kunio Ishikawa

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The composition of carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) aids bone regeneration. Other features, such as porosity and pore interconnectivity of artificial bone, also govern bone regeneration. In general, a trade‐off exists between the porosity and mechanical strength of artificial bone. Therefore, this suggests that the interconnected pores in the ant‐nest‐type porous (ANP) structure of artificial bone accelerate bone regeneration by minimizing the sacrifice of mechanical strength. The unique structure of polyurethane foam has the potential to endow CO3Ap with an ANP structure without forming excess pores. This study investigated the efficacy of polyurethane foam as a porogen in providing ANP structure to CO3Ap artificial bone. The polyurethane foam was completely decomposed by sintering and the resulting CO3Ap displayed ANP structure with a compressive strength of approximately 15 MPa. Furthermore, in vivo experiments revealed that the migration of cells and tissues into the interior of CO3Ap through the interconnected pores accelerated bone regeneration in the ANP‐structured CO3Ap. Thus, this indicates that using polyurethane foam as a porogen endows the CO3Ap artificial bone with an ANP structure that accelerates bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Dental Science Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan

Institute of Biomaterials and Bioengineering Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · Uehara Memorial Foundation

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14686996.2021.194712010.1080/14686996.2021.1947120 ↗
2. 10.1201/9780203751367-1910.1201/9780203751367-19 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0255605910.1007/BF02556059 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0006010.1021/acsabm.0c00060 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.10003110.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100031 ↗
6. 10.1039/C7TB00741H10.1039/C7TB00741H ↗
7. 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.00810.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.a.3484510.1002/jbm.a.34845 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.00710.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
10. 10.1097/00005373‐200001000‐0003710.1097/00005373‐200001000‐00037 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1744‐7402.2005.02020.x10.1111/j.1744‐7402.2005.02020.x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
13. 10.1039/D1MA00698C10.1039/D1MA00698C ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.3737410.1002/jbm.a.37374 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1223399710.3390/ma12233997 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.16810.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.168 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.06410.1016/j.msec.2017.08.064 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.01710.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.017 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2007.01762.x10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2007.01762.x ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.02510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.025 ↗
21. 10.4012/dmj.2010‐08710.4012/dmj.2010‐087 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.18810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.188 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.21275110.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212751 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c0048010.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00480 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jssc.2017.07.02510.1016/j.jssc.2017.07.025 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.02610.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.026 ↗
27. 10.1186/s40038‐016‐0012‐310.1186/s40038‐016‐0012‐3 ↗
28. 10.1002/ppsc.20060100910.1002/ppsc.200601009 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10949010.1016/j.matdes.2021.109490 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.02810.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.028 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.00710.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 ↗
33. 10.1093/rb/rbac01010.1093/rb/rbac010 ↗