Comparison of dam failure frequencies and failure probabilities
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recently the author has compared observed collapse frequencies and computed failure probabilities of bridges. In contrast, in this paper the comparison of observed failure frequencies and the failure probabilities of large dams is carried out. In the paper the failure frequencies are estimated based on various publications related to the failure statistics of dams for different regions and different times. The various publications are considered in terms of a meta‐analysis to provide a robust estimation of the failure frequencies and to identify trends of the failure frequencies. The failure trend analysis considers both; the failure frequency per year and the failure frequency related to the accumulated experience in dam years. The latter enables the comparison to the generalized learning curve. The failure frequencies are compared to the computed probabilities of failure for dams. The comparison is evaluated with regard to the accuracy of the computed values to the observed ones.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dam Engineering and Safety · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bern University of Applied Sciences Architecture, Wood and Civil Engineering Pestalozzistrasse 20 3400 Burgdorf Switzerland
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Proske D. · 2016 · 109
2. 10.1007/978-3-319-47886-9_810.1007/978-3-319-47886-9_8 ↗
3. Proske D.:Versagenshäufigkeit und Versagenswahrscheinlichkeit von Brücken 28th Dresdner Brückenbausymposium Dresden 2018 pp.189–199.
4. 10.1007/978-3-319-73833-810.1007/978-3-319-73833-8 ↗
5. ICOLD: International Commission on Large Dams: Role of Dams http://www.icold‐cigb 2018.
6. ICOLD: International Commission on Large Dams Bulletin 143: Historical review on ancient dams 2013 Paris.
7. Yang H. · 1999
8. White E. · 2016
9. Jansen R.B. · 1983
10. 2018
11. 1995
12. 10.1007/978-3-662-10262-610.1007/978-3-662-10262-6 ↗
13. Inhaber H. · 1982
14. International Rivers: Damming Statistics https://www.internationalrivers.org/damming‐statistics 2018.
15. Zhang L. · 2017
16. ICOLD: International Commission on Large Dams World Register of Dams July2011 Paris.
17. ICOLD: International Commission on Large Dams Bulletin 99 Dam Failures – Statistical Analysis 1995 Paris.
18. Wikipedia: Dam failures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dam_failure 2018.
19. ASDOS Association of State Dam Safety Officials: Failure and Incidents at Dams https://damsafety.org/dam‐failures 2018.
20. U.S. Department of Interior:RCEM – Reclamation Consequence Estimation Methodology: Dam Failure and Flood Event Case History Compilation February2014 https://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/documents/RCEM‐CaseHistories20140731.pdf.
21. 10.1029/WR016i003p0044910.1029/WR016i003p00449 ↗
22. Ott K. O. · 1984
23. Ebi P. · 2007
24. 2014 Lombardi Engineering Ltd Switzerland
25. Kalinina A.;Spada M.;Marelli S.;Burgherr P.;Sudret B.:Uncertainties in the Risk Assessment of Hydropower Dams: State‐of‐the‐Art and Outlook Paul Scherrer Institute ETH Zürich 2016.
26. Kalinina A Sacco T.;Spada M.;Burgherr P.:Risk Assessment for Dams of different Types and Purposes in OECD and non‐OECD countries with a Focus on Time Trend Analysis HYDRO2017 Sevilla Spain 11 pages.
27. FerranteF.;Bensi M.;MitmanJ.:Uncertainty Analysis for Large Dam Failure Frequencies Based on Historical Data NRC ADAMS Accession No. ML1398A170 2013.
28. ICOLD: International Commission on Large Dams Damś safety is at the very origin of the foundation of ICOLD www.icold‐cigb.net 2018.
29. U.S. Department of Interior:Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis Part IX – Risk Assessment/Management Version 4.0 July2015.
30. Kalinina A. · 2017 · 412
31. Tatolovich J. · 1998
32. Duffey R.B. · 2003
33. Steedam S. · 2010 · 3
34. Akesson B. · 2008
35. Petroski P. · 2008