journal article·2019-07

A review on the use of computational methods to characterize, design, and optimize tissue engineering scaffolds, with a potential in 3D printing fabrication

Shuo Zhang, Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman, Wen Feng Lu, Jerry Y H Fuh

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The design and fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds is a highly complex process. In order to provide a proper architecture for cells to grow, proliferate, and differentiate to form tissues, scaffolds have to be made with suitable properties. However, the limited structural designs and conventional fabrication techniques severely cripple the improvement of scaffold properties. To overcome these limitations, many researchers have recently adopted computational methods combined with 3D printing techniques as a new approach for scaffold design and fabrication. This approach allows scaffolds to be designed and fabricated with highly complex microstructures and good control and accuracy. Previous works have also shown this approach to be a very useful tool to predict the scaffold properties and to optimize the scaffold designs with a great reduction of experimental iterations. As this approach combining computational methods and 3D printing techniques for scaffold design and fabrication has many advantages over the conventional trial‐and‐error based approach, it is imperative to provide a state‐of‐the‐art review on the topic. To this end, this article reviews the various applications of computational methods in scaffold design and simulation; it also briefly reviews the application of 3D printing techniques to fabricate the computationally designed scaffolds. Finally, the limitations and future trends of this approach are discussed. Overall, this review will enable readers to understand the benefits of using computational methods coupled with 3D printing to design and fabricate scaffolds, and thus help researchers to improve and optimize the scaffold properties for future tissue engineering research. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 1329–1351, 2019.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1 Singapore 117576 Singapore

Funding

Singapore Ministry of Education

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
2. 10.1016/j.bprint.2016.08.00110.1016/j.bprint.2016.08.001 ↗
3. 10.1111/aor.1287310.1111/aor.12873 ↗
4. 10.1155/2011/29060210.1155/2011/290602 ↗
5. Regenerative medicine in organ and tissue transplantation: Shortly and practically achievable?
6. 10.4103/0975-7406.16001310.4103/0975-7406.160013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.00410.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.b.3354710.1002/jbm.b.33547 ↗
9. 10.1205/cherd0619610.1205/cherd06196 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00586-008-0745-310.1007/s00586-008-0745-3 ↗
11. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/03200110.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032001 ↗
12. Almeida HA · 2013 · 117
13. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.05.00610.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.05.006 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1741-6892.2004.00477.x10.1111/j.1741-6892.2004.00477.x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.00210.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.06.00110.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.06.001 ↗
17. 10.1021/cr300426x10.1021/cr300426x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.00310.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.003 ↗
19. 10.1186/s12967-016-1028-010.1186/s12967-016-1028-0 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.01910.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.019 ↗
21. 10.1089/10763270175333764510.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00776-014-0594-310.1007/s00776-014-0594-3 ↗
23. 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.043710.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
24. 10.1152/ajpendo.00111.201310.1152/ajpendo.00111.2013 ↗
25. Your Body Is Soft. Why Would You Grow Your Cells on Hard Plastic Material? 2015. Excellness. [ONLINE]. Available at:http://www.excellness.com/background.html[Accessed 25 July 2018].
26. 10.1007/s10616-015-9895-410.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cma.2006.09.02310.1016/j.cma.2006.09.023 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.02410.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.024 ↗
29. 10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/01502310.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015023 ↗
30. 10.1098/rsta.2009.002410.1098/rsta.2009.0024 ↗
31. 10.1115/1.403639610.1115/1.4036396 ↗
32. Applications of computational modelling and simulation of porous medium in tissue engineering
33. 10.1557/jmr.2018.15910.1557/jmr.2018.159 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-010.1016/S0142-9612(01)00232-0 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.057 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00276-410.1016/S0142-9612(02)00276-4 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.039 ↗
38. 10.1042/BA2003010810.1042/BA20030108 ↗
39. 10.1042/BA2003010910.1042/BA20030109 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.02010.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.020 ↗
41. 10.1371/journal.pone.014693510.1371/journal.pone.0146935 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.029 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.06.00610.1016/j.medengphy.2012.06.006 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.02210.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.022 ↗
45. 10.3390/bioengineering403006610.3390/bioengineering4030066 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.05.00610.1016/j.medengphy.2014.05.006 ↗
47. 10.1371/journal.pone.018290210.1371/journal.pone.0182902 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.03510.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.035 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.05210.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.052 ↗
50. On the design of porous structures with enhanced fatigue life
51. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa698e10.1088/1758-5090/aa698e ↗
52. 10.1002/jbm.b.3136110.1002/jbm.b.31361 ↗
53. 10.1115/1.297987310.1115/1.2979873 ↗
54. 10.1115/1.400499410.1115/1.4004994 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.01310.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.013 ↗
56. 10.7763/IJMO.2013.V3.32210.7763/IJMO.2013.V3.322 ↗
57. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.83-86.91410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.83-86.914 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.01110.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.011 ↗
59. EntezariA ZhangZ ChenJ LiQ.Optimization of bone tissue scaffolds fabricated by robocasting technique. Presented at the 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimisation Sydney June 7–12 2015.
60. 10.1002/pi.458510.1002/pi.4585 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.02510.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.025 ↗
62. 10.2174/187412070070101002310.2174/1874120700701010023 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.009 ↗
64. 10.1115/1.403040910.1115/1.4030409 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.01510.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.015 ↗
66. 10.1115/1.400331410.1115/1.4003314 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.02010.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.020 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.03210.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.032 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.11.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.11.035 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.03210.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.032 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.12.00310.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.12.003 ↗
72. 10.1371/journal.pone.015621010.1371/journal.pone.0156210 ↗
73. Bettelheim FA · 2013 · 870
74. Hall JE · 2012 · 291
75. Interstitial fluid flow: The mechanical environment of cells and foundation of meridians10.1155/2012/853516 ↗
76. Raimondi MT · 2010 · 237
77. 10.1051/matecconf/20171000402410.1051/matecconf/201710004024 ↗
78. 10.1073/pnas.152134211310.1073/pnas.1521342113 ↗
79. 10.1038/nmat457010.1038/nmat4570 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.057 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.01210.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.012 ↗
82. Design of bioreactors for mesenchymal stem cell tissue engineering
83. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041 ↗
84. Raimondi MT · 2006
85. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.00310.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.003 ↗
86. Simulation of direct perfusion through 3D cellular scaffolds with different porosity
87. Computational modeling of the fluid mechanical environment of regular and irregular scaffolds
88. 10.5923/j.ajbe.20110102.1310.5923/j.ajbe.20110102.13 ↗
89. 10.1021/ie902041v10.1021/ie902041v ↗
90. 10.1089/ten.tec.2011.066010.1089/ten.tec.2011.0660 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.00110.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001 ↗
92. Fan J · 2013 · 1984
93. 10.3389/fbioe.2017.0000610.3389/fbioe.2017.00006 ↗
94. 10.1007/s10237-014-0599-z10.1007/s10237-014-0599-z ↗
95. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.02110.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.021 ↗
96. 10.1080/10255842.2016.121543610.1080/10255842.2016.1215436 ↗
97. 10.1098/rsfs.2014.009710.1098/rsfs.2014.0097 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.01110.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.011 ↗
99. 10.1002/bit.2520010.1002/bit.25200 ↗
100. 10.1115/1.400491810.1115/1.4004918 ↗