Effects of resin formulation and nanofiller surface treatment on in vitro wear of experimental hybrid resin composite
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract While adding nonbonded nanofillers and lowering the viscosity of the resin matrix have shown success in reducing deleterious polymerization stresses in dental composites, their effects on wear resistance is unknown. This study evaluated abrasion and attrition wear of experimental composites with varied resin viscosities [inherent to varied ratios of TEGDMA:UDMA:bis‐GMA (47:33:16 wt%; 30:33:33 wt%; 12:33:51 wt%)] and nanofiller surface treatment (12.6 wt% silanated or unsilanated silica: OX‐50; 0.04 μm). Specimens (n = 6) were light cured, aged in water at 37°C for 7 days, and evaluated in the new OHSU oral wear simulator (100,000 cycles). Nonbonded nanofiller increased abrasion and attrition in the low and medium viscosity composites. Increase in resin viscosity increased abrasion and attrition in composites containing silanated nanofiller, with equivocal effects in composites containing unsilanated nanofiller. Nonbonded nanofiller can lower the overall wear resistance of some composite formulations. Increasing resin viscosity generally lowers the wear resistance, but had minimal effect on composites containing nonbonded nanofiller. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2006
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/0022034584063012110110.1177/00220345840630121101 ↗
2. Composite wall‐to‐wall poymerization contraction in dentin cavities treated with various bonding agents
3. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity
4. 10.1016/0109-5641(91)90055-410.1016/0109-5641(91)90055-4 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00033.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00033.x ↗
6. 10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00036-010.1016/S0109-5641(98)00036-0 ↗
7. Resin viscosity and filler treatment effects on hybrid composite mechanical properties
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.003 ↗
9. 10.1177/0022034597076008140110.1177/00220345970760081401 ↗
10. 10.1016/0300-5712(84)90071-X10.1016/0300-5712(84)90071-X ↗
11. 10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80004-510.1016/S0109-5641(86)80004-5 ↗
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199724)38:4<303::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199724)38:4<303::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
13. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)80001-X10.1016/S0142-9612(98)80001-X ↗
14. Effect of light activation method on flexural properties of dental composites
15. 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80026-110.1016/S0109-5641(96)80026-1 ↗
16. A materials scientist's view: assessment of wear and marginal integrity
17. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)86744-510.1016/0142-9612(96)86744-5 ↗
18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<12::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-U10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<12::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
19. 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00103-210.1016/S0109-5641(00)00103-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90105-L10.1016/0109-5641(92)90105-L ↗
21. New American Dental Association specification No. 27 for direct filling resins
22. 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00043-710.1016/0300-5712(95)00043-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/0043-1648(77)90081-310.1016/0043-1648(77)90081-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90073-610.1016/0109-5641(94)90073-6 ↗
25. 10.1177/0022034598077004120110.1177/00220345980770041201 ↗
26. 10.1177/0022034597076007110110.1177/00220345970760071101 ↗
27. Abrasion of class 1 restorative resins
28. Roulet JF · 1987 · 60
29. 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00064.x10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00064.x ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00246.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00246.x ↗
31. Clinical wear of hybrid composites containing non‐bonded nanofillers