Functional dependence of resonant harmonics on nanomechanical parameters in dynamic mode atomic force microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a combined theoretical and experimental study of the dependence of resonant higher harmonics of rectangular cantilevers of an atomic force microscope (AFM) as a function of relevant parameters such as the cantilever force constant, tip radius and free oscillation amplitude as well as the stiffness of the sample’s surface. The simulations reveal a universal functional dependence of the amplitude of the 6th harmonic (in resonance with the 2nd flexural mode) on these parameters, which can be expressed in terms of a gun-shaped function. This analytical expression can be regarded as a practical tool for extracting qualitative information from AFM measurements and it can be extended to any resonant harmonics. The experiments confirm the predicted dependence in the explored 3–45 N/m force constant range and 2–345 GPa sample’s stiffness range. For force constants around 25 N/m, the amplitude of the 6th harmonic exhibits the largest sensitivity for ultrasharp tips (tip radius below 10 nm) and polymers (Young’s modulus below 20 GPa).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Near-Field Optical Microscopy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/978352763218310.1002/9783527632183 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0039-6028(00)00378-210.1016/S0039-6028(00)00378-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00077-810.1016/S0167-5729(02)00077-8 ↗
4. 10.1088/1367-2630/2/1/00510.1088/1367-2630/2/1/005 ↗
5. 10.1002/sia.239210.1002/sia.2392 ↗
6. Hertz · Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik · 1881 · 92 · 156
7. 10.1088/0957-4484/4/2/00210.1088/0957-4484/4/2/002 ↗
8. 10.1201/9781420050493.ch510.1201/9781420050493.ch5 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.04210669910.1073/pnas.042106699 ↗
10. 10.1016/b978-0-12-391927-4.10003-910.1016/b978-0-12-391927-4.10003-9 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.16541610.1103/PhysRevB.69.165416 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.132540410.1063/1.1325404 ↗
13. 10.1117/12.219695110.1117/12.2196951 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.115002110.1063/1.1150021 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.36800210.1063/1.368002 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.366963810.1063/1.3669638 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.470437610.1063/1.4704376 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2cp43031b10.1039/c2cp43031b ↗
19. 10.1063/1.489227710.1063/1.4892277 ↗
20. 10.1088/0957-0233/26/1/01500210.1088/0957-0233/26/1/015002 ↗
21. 10.1002/smll.20090167310.1002/smll.200901673 ↗
22. 10.1021/cr960068q10.1021/cr960068q ↗
23. 10.1016/S0301-679X(00)00028-110.1016/S0301-679X(00)00028-1 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn403435z10.1021/nn403435z ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.12550110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.125501 ↗
26. 10.1002/smll.20100211610.1002/smll.201002116 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.01510.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.015 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.490086410.1063/1.4900864 ↗
29. 10.1038/nnano.2012.3810.1038/nnano.2012.38 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.04.02110.1016/j.mee.2015.04.021 ↗