journal article·2017-01-06Open access

Structural and tribometric characterization of biomimetically inspired synthetic "insect adhesives"

Matthias W Speidel, Malte Kleemeier, Andreas Hartwig, Klaus Rischka, Angelika Ellermann, Rolf Daniels, Oliver Betz

Abstract

Background: Based on previous chemical analyses of insect tarsal adhesives, we prepared 12 heterogeneous synthetic emulsions mimicking the polar/non-polar principle, analysed their microscopical structure and tested their adhesive, frictional, and rheological properties. Results: The prepared emulsions varied in their consistency from solid rubber-like, over soft elastic, to fluid (watery or oily). With droplet sizes >100 nm, all the emulsions belonged to the common type of macroemulsions. The emulsions of the first generation generally showed broader droplet-size ranges compared with the second generation, especially when less defined components such as petrolatum or waxes were present in the lipophilic fraction of the first generation of emulsions. Some of the prepared emulsions showed a yield point and were Bingham fluids. Tribometric adhesion was tested via probe tack tests. Compared with the "second generation" (containing less viscous components), the "first generation" emulsions were much more adhesive (31–93 mN), a finding attributable to their highly viscous components, i.e., wax, petrolatum, gelatin and poly(vinyl alcohol). In the second generation emulsions, we attained much lower adhesivenesses, ranging between 1–18 mN. The adhesive performance was drastically reduced in the emulsions that contained albumin as the protein component or that lacked protein. Tribometric shear tests were performed at moderate normal loads. Our measured friction forces (4–93 mN in the first and 0.1–5.8 mN in the second generation emulsions) were comparatively low. Differences in shear performance were related to the chemical composition and emulsion structure. Conclusion: By varying their chemical composition, synthetic heterogeneous adhesive emulsions can be adjusted to have diverse consistencies and are able to mimic certain rheological and tribological properties of natural tarsal insect adhesives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2001.00155.x10.1046/j.1439-0469.2001.00155.x ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1970.tb00691.x10.1111/j.1365-3032.1970.tb00691.x ↗
3. Dixon · Journal of Experimental Biology · 1990 · 152 · 24310.1242/jeb.152.1.243 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-7091-0286-2_810.1007/978-3-7091-0286-2_8 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00359-006-0150-510.1007/s00359-006-0150-5 ↗
6. 10.1163/15685610778232833510.1163/156856107782328335 ↗
7. 10.1007/bf0162847310.1007/bf01628473 ↗
8. Stork · Journal of Experimental Biology · 1980 · 88 · 9110.1242/jeb.88.1.91 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb03536.x10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb03536.x ↗
10. 10.1016/0143-7496(93)90002-Q10.1016/0143-7496(93)90002-Q ↗
11. Lees · Journal of Experimental Biology · 1988 · 136 · 20910.1242/jeb.136.1.209 ↗
12. 10.1098/rspb.2004.285010.1098/rspb.2004.2850 ↗
13. 10.1098/rsif.2009.030810.1098/rsif.2009.0308 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.aca.2014.10.05610.1016/j.aca.2014.10.056 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.02.02710.1016/j.chroma.2015.02.027 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10886-016-0718-710.1007/s10886-016-0718-7 ↗
17. 10.1111/imb.1224110.1111/imb.12241 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00049-009-0021-y10.1007/s00049-009-0021-y ↗
19. 10.1139/z99-21310.1139/z99-213 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00098-X10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00098-X ↗
21. 10.1098/rsta.2007.217210.1098/rsta.2007.2172 ↗
22. 10.1093/icb/42.6.110010.1093/icb/42.6.1100 ↗
23. 10.1016/0927-7757(93)02719-U10.1016/0927-7757(93)02719-U ↗
24. 10.1088/0034-4885/62/6/20310.1088/0034-4885/62/6/203 ↗
25. 10.1242/jeb.06572210.1242/jeb.065722 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00359-010-0522-810.1007/s00359-010-0522-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.04.00710.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.04.007 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.petrol.2005.06.01410.1016/j.petrol.2005.06.014 ↗
29. 10.1006/jcis.1996.459210.1006/jcis.1996.4592 ↗
30. 10.2495/DN08001110.2495/DN080011 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.07.00110.1016/j.cis.2009.07.001 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cocis.2010.10.00110.1016/j.cocis.2010.10.001 ↗
33. 10.1557/mrs2007.8410.1557/mrs2007.84 ↗
34. 10.1088/1748-3182/2/4/S0110.1088/1748-3182/2/4/S01 ↗
35. 10.1098/rsta.2010.019710.1098/rsta.2010.0197 ↗
36. 10.1098/rsfs.2014.008610.1098/rsfs.2014.0086 ↗
37. 10.1016/0305-0491(95)00081-x10.1016/0305-0491(95)00081-x ↗
38. 10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00059-810.1016/S0022-1910(02)00059-8 ↗
39. Attygalle · Zoology (Jena, Ger.) · 2000 · 103 · 1
40. 10.1007/BF0256874110.1007/BF02568741 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00435005008810.1007/s004350050088 ↗
42. Habenicht · 200910.1007/978-3-540-85266-7 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.asd.2003.10.00210.1016/j.asd.2003.10.002 ↗
44. Jiao · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2000 · 203 · 188710.1242/jeb.203.12.1887 ↗
45. 10.1098/rstb.2014.002710.1098/rstb.2014.0027 ↗
46. 10.1039/C5SM01496D10.1039/C5SM01496D ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.11.00110.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.11.001 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.zool.2011.09.00610.1016/j.zool.2011.09.006 ↗
49. Israelachvili · 2011
50. 10.1116/1.162733610.1116/1.1627336 ↗
51. 10.1098/rspb.2007.166010.1098/rspb.2007.1660 ↗
52. 10.1242/jeb.02094110.1242/jeb.020941 ↗
53. 10.1242/jeb.0071610.1242/jeb.00716 ↗
54. Mate · 2008
55. 10.1021/j100118a03310.1021/j100118a033 ↗
56. 10.5254/1.353548510.5254/1.3535485 ↗
57. 10.5254/1.353945510.5254/1.3539455 ↗
58. 10.1088/0370-1301/66/5/30610.1088/0370-1301/66/5/306 ↗
59. 10.1073/pnas.091472010710.1073/pnas.0914720107 ↗
60. Gorb · 2007 · 812
61. 10.1080/00218464.2013.73136310.1080/00218464.2013.731363 ↗
62. 10.1002/andp.1875230021310.1002/andp.18752300213 ↗