journal article·2005-08

Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic

Sven M. Reich, Manfred Wichmann, Roland Frankenberger, Dorothea Zajc

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three resin cements to Vita Mark II ceramics under different pretreatments of the ceramic surface and to examine whether simplified pretreatment procedures would result in satisfying results compared to the state of the art. RelyX Unicem (RXU), Calibra (CAL), and Variolink II (VAR) were used as resin cements and bonded to machine milled feldspatic disks, pretreated in five different ways. (1) no pretreatment of the ceramic surface; (2) surface etched with hydrofluoric acid (HF); (3) ceramic surface silanized; (4) ceramic surface etched (HF) and silanized, (5) ceramic surface etched (HF), silanized, and covered with Heliobond. The shear bond strengths were measured initially, after 5000 and 10,000 thermocycles (TC). After 10,000 TC for CAL only procedure 5 resulted in a reliable adhesion median value of 10.7 MPa. VAR showed median values of 24.6, 17.2, and 18.1 MPa for pretreatments 5, 3, and 4, respectively. RXU performed 25.9, 22.0, and 11.0 MPa for procedures 5, 4, and 3, respectively. For procedure 2, RXU revealed the significantly highest value with 15.4 MPa (U‐test, p = 0.05). Only RXU‐luted specimens of procedure 1 survived the 10,000 thermocycles. The results revealed that a simplification of the ceramic pretreatment for VAR and RXU might be possible. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2005
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Trauma and Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Buonocore memorial lecture: Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges
2. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations
3. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00827.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00827.x ↗
4. 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90073-W10.1016/0022-3913(93)90073-W ↗
5. 10.1016/S0011-8532(01)00007-610.1016/S0011-8532(01)00007-6 ↗
6. 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00022.x10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00022.x ↗
7. 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00106-910.1016/S0109-5641(02)00106-9 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00054-910.1016/S0109-5641(01)00054-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00047-110.1016/S0109-5641(01)00047-1 ↗
10. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01027.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01027.x ↗
11. Correlation of topography to bond strength of etched ceramic
12. 10.1006/rtph.1999.134210.1006/rtph.1999.1342 ↗
13. 10.1177/0022034595074001150110.1177/00220345950740011501 ↗
14. Clinical long‐term results and 10‐year Kaplan‐Meier analysis of Cerec restorations
15. 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-910.1016/S0022-3913(05)80076-9 ↗
16. BowenRL. Dental filling material comprising vinyl–silane‐treated fused silica and a binder consisting of the retention product of bisphenol and glycidyl acrylate. US Patent 3 066 112 (Nov. 27 1962).
17. 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-310.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3 ↗