journal article·2023-05-03Open access

SERS performance of GaN/Ag substrates fabricated by Ag coating of GaN platforms

Magdalena A Zając, Bogusław Budner, Malwina Liszewska, Bartosz Bartosewicz, Łukasz Gutowski, Jan L Weyher, Bartłomiej J Jankiewicz

Abstract

The results of comparative studies on the fabrication and characterization of GaN/Ag substrates using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and magnetron sputtering (MS) and their evaluation as potential substrates for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) are reported. Ag layers of comparable thicknesses were deposited using PLD and MS on nanostructured GaN platforms. All fabricated SERS substrates were examined regarding their optical properties using UV–vis spectroscopy and regarding their morphology using scanning electron microscopy. SERS properties of the fabricated GaN/Ag substrates were evaluated by measuring SERS spectra of 4-mercaptobenzoic acid molecules adsorbed on them. For all PLD-made GaN/Ag substrates, the estimated enhancement factors were higher than for MS-made substrates with a comparable thickness of the Ag layer. In the best case, the PLD-made GaN/Ag substrate exhibited an approximately 4.4 times higher enhancement factor than the best MS-made substrate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0422410.1021/acsnano.9b04224 ↗
2. 10.1039/d0sc00809e10.1039/d0sc00809e ↗
3. 10.1039/c7an00118e10.1039/c7an00118e ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0159710.1021/acs.analchem.6b01597 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41570-017-006010.1038/s41570-017-0060 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0066810.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00668 ↗
7. 10.1039/c7cs00172j10.1039/c7cs00172j ↗
8. 10.1021/nn901359310.1021/nn9013593 ↗
9. 10.1155/2012/80807910.1155/2012/808079 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0460610.1021/acs.analchem.0c04606 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.saa.2018.02.04610.1016/j.saa.2018.02.046 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.03.01810.1016/j.trac.2018.03.018 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.aca.2015.04.01010.1016/j.aca.2015.04.010 ↗
14. 10.1002/jrs.484410.1002/jrs.4844 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12171410.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121714 ↗
16. 10.1039/c9nr07439b10.1039/c9nr07439b ↗
17. 10.1039/d1tb01299a10.1039/d1tb01299a ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.01910.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.019 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.aca.2017.06.00210.1016/j.aca.2017.06.002 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20110349610.1002/adma.201103496 ↗
21. 10.3390/bios902005710.3390/bios9020057 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0078610.1021/acsphotonics.6b00786 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.00210.1016/j.snb.2017.07.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14845610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148456 ↗
25. 10.1002/advs.20210064010.1002/advs.202100640 ↗
26. 10.1063/5.011554710.1063/5.0115547 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.10030510.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100305 ↗
28. 10.1039/c0jm03336g10.1039/c0jm03336g ↗
29. 10.1063/1.476910610.1063/1.4769106 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1137110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11371 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mssp.2018.11.01210.1016/j.mssp.2018.11.012 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.07610.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.076 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2018.11.00210.1016/j.vibspec.2018.11.002 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.01910.1016/j.bios.2019.03.019 ↗
35. 10.1039/d2ra05318g10.1039/d2ra05318g ↗
36. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.12131210.1016/j.saa.2022.121312 ↗
37. 10.3762/bjnano.10.8910.3762/bjnano.10.89 ↗
38. 10.1007/s42114-021-00330-010.1007/s42114-021-00330-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.003 ↗
40. 10.1126/science.115949910.1126/science.1159499 ↗
41. 10.1039/c1an15432j10.1039/c1an15432j ↗
42. 10.1155/2012/17327310.1155/2012/173273 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja906954f10.1021/ja906954f ↗
44. 10.1063/1.470508310.1063/1.4705083 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.04.02010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.04.020 ↗