Pulsatile dynamic stiffness of cartilage‐like materials and use of agarose gels to validate mechanical methods and models
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Stiffness is a fundamental indicator of the functional state of articular cartilage. Reported test modes include compressive incremental strain to determine the equilibrium modulus, and sinusoidal strain to determine the dynamic modulus and stress/strain loss angle. Here, initial development is described for a method recognizing that gait is pulsatile. Agarose gels have been used by others for validation or comparison of mechanical test methods and models for cartilage and proteoglycan aggregate. Accordingly, gels ranging from 0.5 to 20% agarose were prepared. Pulsatile stiffness in both indentation and unconfined compression were closely reproducible. Stiffness as a function of agarose concentration rose exponentially, as found using other methods. Indentation stiffness was higher than for unconfined compression and ranged from ∼2.0 kPa for 0.5% gel to ∼3800 kPa for 20% gel. Pulsatile dynamic stiffness appears to be a useful method, although further development is needed. Agarose gel stiffness values obtained by other methods were reviewed for comparison. Unfortunately, reported values for a given agarose concentration ranged widely (e.g. fourfold) even when test methods were similar. Causes appear to include differences in molecular weight and gel preparation time–temperature regimens. Also, agarose is hygroscopic, leading to unintended variations in gel composition. Agarose gels are problematic materials for validation or comparison of cartilage mechanical test methods and models. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2006
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74375-110.1016/S0006-3495(04)74375-1 ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
3. 10.1088/0031-9155/46/2/31910.1088/0031-9155/46/2/319 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00052-010.1016/S0021-9290(02)00052-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00437-210.1016/S0021-9290(02)00437-2 ↗
6. Bueckle IH · 1973
7. 10.1021/jp012842610.1021/jp0128426 ↗
8. 10.1016/0021-9290(72)90010-310.1016/0021-9290(72)90010-3 ↗
9. 10.1021/bm005583j10.1021/bm005583j ↗
10. CostaKD HoMMY HungCT.Multi‐scale measurement of mechanical properties of soft samples with atomic force microscopy. In: Trans Summer Bioeng Conf Key Biscayne FL June2003.
11. 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.1.23110.1152/jappl.1998.85.1.231 ↗
12. ChenQ SukiB AnK‐A.Dynamic mechanical properties of agarose gel by a fractional derivative model. In: Trans Summer Bioeng Conf Key Biscayne FL June2003.
13. Haliday D · 2001
14. Lakes RS · 1998
15. 10.1002/1097-0282(200109)59:3<131::AID-BIP1013>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/1097-0282(200109)59:3<131::AID-BIP1013>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.313820210.1115/1.3138202 ↗
17. Mankin HJ · 2000
18. 10.1016/j.joca.2003.08.00510.1016/j.joca.2003.08.005 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.168877210.1115/1.1688772 ↗
20. Gu WY · 1996 · 89