journal article·2024-08Open access

Exploring the biodegradability of candidate metallic intravascular stent materials using X‐ray microfocus computed tomography: An in vitro study

Lisa Leyssens, Noémie Lapraille, Grzegorz Pyka, Pascal J. Jacques, Sandrine Horman, Jeremy Goldman, Greet Kerckhofs

Abstract

Abstract In vitro testing for evaluating degradation mode and rate of candidate biodegradable metals to be used as intravascular stents is crucial before going to in vivo animal models. In this study, we show that X‐ray microfocus computed tomography (microCT) presents a key added value to visualize degradation mode and to evaluate degradation rate and material surface properties in 3D and at high resolution of large regions of interest. The in vitro degradation behavior of three candidate biodegradable stent materials was evaluated: pure iron (Fe), pure zinc (Zn), and a quinary Zn alloy (ZnAgCuMnZr). These metals were compared to a reference biostable cobaltchromium (CoCr) alloy. To compare the degradation mode and degradation rate evaluated with microCT, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and inductively‐coupled plasma (ICP) were included. We confirmed that Fe degrades very slowly but with desirable uniform surface corrosion. Zn degrades faster but exhibits localized deep pitting corrosion. The Zn alloy degrades at a similar rate as the pure Zn, but more homogeneously. However, the formation of deep internal dendrites was observed. Our study provides a detailed microCT‐based comparison of essential surface and corrosion properties, with a structural characterization of the corrosion behavior, of different candidate stent materials in 3D in a non‐destructive way.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechatronic, Electrical Energy and Dynamic Systems Institute of Mechanics, Materials, and Civil Engineering, UCLouvain Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium

Pole of Morphology Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain Woluwe‐Saint‐Lambert Belgium

Materials and Process Engineering Institute of Mechanics, Materials, and Civil Engineering, UCLouvain Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium

Pole of Cardiovascular Research Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain Woluwe‐Saint‐Lambert Belgium

Department of Biomedical Engineering Michigan Technological University Houghton Michigan USA

Department of Materials Engineering KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Prometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

Funding

Hercules Foundation

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3389/fcvm.2017.0000210.3389/fcvm.2017.00002 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0140‐6736(05)66459‐810.1016/S0140‐6736(05)66459‐8 ↗
3. 10.1007/s40204‐018‐0097‐y10.1007/s40204‐018‐0097‐y ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.02810.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.028 ↗
5. 10.4236/jbnb.2019.10401010.4236/jbnb.2019.104010 ↗
6. 10.1002/adhm.20150101910.1002/adhm.201501019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.00110.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 ↗
8. 10.3390/ijms1207425010.3390/ijms12074250 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.a.3534810.1002/jbm.a.35348 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.00110.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.02110.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.021 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.15310.1016/j.msec.2017.04.153 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.02910.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.029 ↗
14. 10.1136/heart.86.5.56310.1136/heart.86.5.563 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.02910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.029 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1540‐8183.2007.00319.x10.1111/j.1540‐8183.2007.00319.x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.00310.1016/j.jot.2015.08.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmst.2015.12.01810.1016/j.jmst.2015.12.018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.05010.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.050 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0074010.1021/acsabm.0c00740 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.10.01510.1016/j.matchar.2017.10.015 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.01410.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.014 ↗
23. 10.1023/A:101983180850310.1023/A:1019831808503 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1540‐8183.2000.tb00286.x10.1111/j.1540‐8183.2000.tb00286.x ↗
25. 10.1007/978‐0‐387‐48998‐8_150610.1007/978‐0‐387‐48998‐8_1506 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.03910.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.039 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.01210.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.012 ↗
29. 10.1002/jbm.b.3427410.1002/jbm.b.34274 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11964110.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119641 ↗
31. 10.1002/maco.20170952110.1002/maco.201709521 ↗
32. 10.1002/jbm.b.3192210.1002/jbm.b.31922 ↗
33. ASTM G31‐72.Standard Practice for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals.2004. doi:10.1520/G0031‐72R0410.1520/G0031 ↗
34. 10.5281/zenodo.703426510.5281/zenodo.7034265 ↗
35. 10.1002/adem.20120015610.1002/adem.201200156 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11129510.1016/j.msec.2020.111295 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20130022610.1002/adma.201300226 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.16710.1016/j.msec.2017.02.167 ↗
39. 10.1002/ccd.2040010.1002/ccd.20400 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.04710.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.047 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.12810.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.128 ↗
42. 10.1038/srep1071910.1038/srep10719 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.10.02310.1016/j.msec.2013.10.023 ↗
44. 10.1002/jbm.b.3278310.1002/jbm.b.32783 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.06510.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.065 ↗
46. 10.1002/jbm.b.3385010.1002/jbm.b.33850 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.9b0537010.1021/acsami.9b05370 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11837‐019‐03371‐510.1007/s11837‐019‐03371‐5 ↗