Macrophage activation in response to shape memory polymer foam‐coated aneurysm occlusion devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Brain aneurysms can be treated with embolic coils using minimally invasive approaches. It is advantageous to modulate the biologic response of platinum embolic coils. Our previous studies demonstrated that shape memory polymer (SMP) foam coated embolization coils (FCC) devices demonstrate enhanced healing responses in animal models compared with standard bare platinum coil (BPC) devices. Macrophages are the most prevalent immune cell type that coordinate the greater immune response to implanted materials. Hence, we hypothesized that the highly porous SMP foam coatings on embolic coils activate a pro‐regenerative healing phenotype. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the number and type of infiltrating macrophages in FCC or BPC devices implanted in a rabbit elastase aneurysm model. FCC devices elicited a great number of infiltration macrophages, skewed significantly to a pro‐regenerative M2‐like phenotype 90 days following implantation. We devised an in vitro assay, where monocyte‐derived macrophages were placed in close association with FCC or BPC devices for 6–72 h. Macrophages encountering SMP FCC‐devices demonstrated highly mixed activation phenotypes at 6 h, heavily skewing toward an M2‐like phenotype by 72 h, compared with macrophages encountering BPC devices. Macrophage activation was evaluated using gene expression analysis, and secreted cytokine evaluation. Together, our results demonstrate that FCC devices promoted a pro‐regenerative macrophage activation phenotype, compared with BPC devices. Our in vitro findings corroborate with in vivo observations that SMP‐based modification of embolic coils can promote better healing of the aneurysm site, by sustaining a pro‐healing macrophage phenotype.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications · Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment · Immune cells in cancer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA
TAMU Master of Biotechnology Program Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA
Department of Nanomedicine Houston Methodist Research Institute Houston Texas USA
Funding
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate · Systematic Reviews Programme
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms: an evidence‐based analysis
2. 10.3174/ajnr.A510110.3174/ajnr.A5101 ↗
3. 10.1177/15910199110170010610.1177/159101991101700106 ↗
4. 10.3174/ajnr.A295810.3174/ajnr.A2958 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60408-X10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60408-X ↗
6. 10.1227/NEU.000000000000074410.1227/NEU.0000000000000744 ↗
7. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.03606110.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.036061 ↗
8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.01559010.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015590 ↗
9. 10.3174/ajnr.A417510.3174/ajnr.A4175 ↗
10. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-01286710.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012867 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jns.2015.11.03710.1016/j.jns.2015.11.037 ↗
12. 10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.010910.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0109 ↗
13. 10.1161/01.STR.0000083394.33633.C210.1161/01.STR.0000083394.33633.C2 ↗
14. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.63038110.3389/fimmu.2021.630381 ↗
15. 10.1097/00006123-199911000-0002410.1097/00006123-199911000-00024 ↗
16. 10.2176/nmc.st.2018-032610.2176/nmc.st.2018-0326 ↗
17. 10.1161/01.STR.0000140636.30204.da10.1161/01.STR.0000140636.30204.da ↗
18. 10.1089/dna.2014.261810.1089/dna.2014.2618 ↗
19. 10.1186/1742-2094-9-22210.1186/1742-2094-9-222 ↗
20. The distribution and role of M1 and M2 macrophages in aneurysm healing after platinum coil embolization
21. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.01910.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.019 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10439-011-0468-110.1007/s10439-011-0468-1 ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.a.3478210.1002/jbm.a.34782 ↗
24. 10.1002/jbm.b.3372510.1002/jbm.b.33725 ↗
25. 10.1002/jbm.b.3433710.1002/jbm.b.34337 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.b.3456110.1002/jbm.b.34561 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.07.00910.1016/j.medengphy.2017.07.009 ↗
28. 10.1089/wound.2019.103210.1089/wound.2019.1032 ↗
29. 10.4049/jimmunol.110318010.4049/jimmunol.1103180 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10439-013-0933-010.1007/s10439-013-0933-0 ↗
31. 10.1002/jbm.a.3456210.1002/jbm.a.34562 ↗
32. 10.3389/fphys.2018.0041910.3389/fphys.2018.00419 ↗
33. 10.1017/S146239941100194310.1017/S1462399411001943 ↗
34. 10.12703/P6-1310.12703/P6-13 ↗
35. 10.1186/s40425-019-0666-110.1186/s40425-019-0666-1 ↗
36. 10.3390/jfb1003003110.3390/jfb10030031 ↗
37. 10.3390/nano710033210.3390/nano7100332 ↗
38. 10.1002/jbm.a.3430910.1002/jbm.a.34309 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-017-03780-z10.1038/s41598-017-03780-z ↗
40. 10.3390/ma809526910.3390/ma8095269 ↗