Resin cement coating reverts the machining damage on the flexural fatigue strength of lithium disilicate glass‐ceramic
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study evaluated the effect of resin cement coating with high and low viscosities on the flexural fatigue strength of machined lithium disilicate glass‐ceramic. Discs (IPS e.max CAD; Ivoclar Vivadent) were prepared and divided according to the surface condition (machining [M]—CEREC inLab; and polishing [P]—laboratory procedures), resin cement coating (with or without), and cement viscosity (high [H] and low [L]). The ceramic bonding surface was etched/primed by a one‐step primer application followed by resin cement application (Variolink N base + high or low viscosity catalyst; Ivoclar Vivadent). Biaxial flexural fatigue strength was evaluated on a piston‐on‐three‐ball set by the step‐test method (n = 15) (initial stress: 60 MPa; incremental steps: 20 MPa; 10,000 cycles/step, at 20 Hz). Weibull statistics were used for fatigue data. Contact angle, topographic, and fractographic analysis were also performed. Machining produced statistically lower contact angle than polishing and a significant detrimental effect on the fatigue behavior (σ0M = 247.2 [246.9–268.3];σ0P = 337.4 [297.8–382.4]). Machined groups followed by resin cement coating (σ0MH = 297.9 [276.0–321.5];σ0Ml = 301.2 [277.1–327.4]) behaved similarly to the polished and coated groups (σ0PH = 342.0 [308.9–378.5];σ0PL = 357.3 [324.7–393.1]), irrespective of the cement viscosity. Therefore, cement coating has able to revert the detrimental effects of the machining on the fatigue strength of lithium disilicate glass‐ceramic. High and low viscosity cements behaved similarly in the improvement of CAD–CAM lithium disilicate fatigue strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Post‐Graduate Program in Dental Sciences, Prosthetic Dentistry Unit, Faculty of Odontology Federal University of Santa Maria Santa Maria Brazil
Department of Conservative Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University São José dos Campos Brazil
Department of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria Santa Maria Brazil
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jbm.b.3110010.1002/jbm.b.31100 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.00510.1016/j.cden.2017.06.005 ↗
3. 10.3889/oamjms.2018.37810.3889/oamjms.2018.378 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.00310.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003 ↗
5. Quinn GD · 2016 · 1
6. 10.1557/JMR.2002.044010.1557/JMR.2002.0440 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.00210.1016/j.dental.2011.09.002 ↗
8. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: clinically failed restorations
9. 10.1243/095441105X936310.1243/095441105X9363 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.00110.1016/j.dental.2012.07.001 ↗
11. The nature of machining damage in brittle materials10.1098/rspa.1983.0023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.07.01910.1016/j.dental.2017.07.019 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.00510.1016/j.dental.2015.04.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.00410.1016/j.dental.2018.11.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.03110.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.031 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.00610.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.006 ↗
17. 10.1177/15440591080870061010.1177/154405910808700610 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.00610.1016/j.dental.2010.05.006 ↗
19. 10.2341/15-025-L10.2341/15-025-L ↗
20. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.00210.1016/j.dental.2017.01.002 ↗
21. The influence of cements on the mechanical performance of dental ceramics
22. Nathanson D · 1993 · 23
23. 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90074-Z10.1016/0109-5641(93)90074-Z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.07.01810.1016/j.dental.2017.07.018 ↗
25. Glass strengthening using epoxy coatings
26. 10.1177/15440591070860060610.1177/154405910708600606 ↗
27. 10.1177/15440591060850031310.1177/154405910608500313 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.00310.1016/j.dental.2012.04.003 ↗
29. Influence of viscosity and curing mode on degree of conversion of dual‐cured resin cements
30. Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications
31. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.02510.1016/j.dental.2010.10.025 ↗
32. IvoclarV.IPS e.max CAD® Instructions for use;2019.
33. International Organization for Standardization.ISO 4287: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method Terms Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters Geneva;1997.
34. IvoclarV.Monobond® Etch & Prime Instructions for Use;2021.
35. IvoclarV.Variolink® N Instructions for Use;2011.
36. 10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.02110.1016/j.dental.2019.07.021 ↗
37. International Organization For Standardization · 2015
38. Collins JA · 1993 · 374
39. Biaxial flexure tests of ceramic substrates
40. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10376910.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103769 ↗
41. Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic core materials in combination with porcelains
42. VölkelT.Variolink N Scientific documentation. Ivoclar Vivadent;2010. p.18.
43. 10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.00910.1016/j.dental.2016.10.009 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.dental.2003.07.00210.1016/j.dental.2003.07.002 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.01210.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.012 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00105-210.1016/S0109-5641(03)00105-2 ↗
47. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material
48. 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.00210.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.002 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.21010.1016/j.dental.2013.08.210 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.01310.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.013 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.03310.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033 ↗
52. Adhesive luting of all‐ceramic restorations—the impact of cementation variables and short‐term water storage on the strength of a feldspathic dental ceramic