journal article·2014-06-16Open access

Pyrite nanoparticles as a Fenton-like reagent for in situ remediation of organic pollutants

Carolina Gil-Lozano, Elisabeth Losa-Adams, Alfonso F.-Dávila, Luis Gago-Duport

Abstract

The Fenton reaction is the most widely used advanced oxidation process (AOP) for wastewater treatment. This study reports on the use of pyrite nanoparticles and microparticles as Fenton reagents for the oxidative degradation of copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) as a representative contaminant. Upon oxidative dissolution in water, pyrite (FeS2) particles can generate H2O2 at their surface while simultaneously promoting recycling of Fe3+ into Fe2+ and vice versa. Pyrite nanoparticles were synthesized by the hot injection method. The use of a high concentration of precursors gave individual nanoparticles (diameter: 20 nm) with broader crystallinity at the outer interfaces, providing a greater number of surface defects, which is advantageous for generating H2O2. Batch reactions were run to monitor the kinetics of CuPc degradation in real time and the amount of H2O2. A markedly greater degradation of CuPc was achieved with nanoparticles as compared to microparticles: at low loadings (0.08 mg/L) and 20 h reaction time, the former enabled 60% CuPc removal, whereas the latter enabled only 7% removal. These results confirm that the use of low concentrations of synthetic nanoparticles can be a cost effective alternative to conventional Fenton procedures for use in wastewater treatment, avoiding the potential risks caused by the release of heavy metals upon dissolution of natural pyrites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced oxidation water treatment · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.clay.2009.11.04410.1016/j.clay.2009.11.044 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.crci.2003.06.00510.1016/j.crci.2003.06.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.catcom.2007.03.03010.1016/j.catcom.2007.03.030 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00102-910.1016/S0920-5861(99)00102-9 ↗
5. Farhataziz · 1977 · 59
6. 10.1021/ar50088a00310.1021/ar50088a003 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01222-X10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01222-X ↗
8. 10.1186/1467-4866-7-310.1186/1467-4866-7-3 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00269010021510.1007/s002690100215 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.05.01610.1016/j.mineng.2013.05.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.10.01110.1016/j.hydromet.2013.10.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.05.02810.1016/j.gca.2010.05.028 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.00810.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.05.01510.1016/j.epsl.2008.05.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.02610.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.026 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00061-210.1016/S0045-6535(99)00061-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.03010.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.030 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.00210.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.002 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.12.03110.1016/j.apcatb.2012.12.031 ↗
20. 10.1039/c1ce05478c10.1039/c1ce05478c ↗
21. 10.1021/cm304152b10.1021/cm304152b ↗
22. 10.1021/jp311110610.1021/jp3111106 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-577X(00)00288-310.1016/S0167-577X(00)00288-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.09.02810.1016/j.cplett.2004.09.028 ↗
25. 10.1039/b917941k10.1039/b917941k ↗
26. 10.1039/c1jm13336e10.1039/c1jm13336e ↗
27. 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90241-010.1016/0016-7037(94)90241-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.01610.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.016 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00253-012-4116-y10.1007/s00253-012-4116-y ↗
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.06.02310.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.06.023 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.07.00610.1016/j.apcatb.2010.07.006 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/40/40520710.1088/0957-4484/20/40/405207 ↗
33. Scherrer · Nachrichten von der (Königl.[ichen]) Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen(, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse) · 1918 · 26 · 98