journal article·2020-05Open access

In vitro and in vivo osteogenic potential of niobium‐doped 45S5 bioactive glass: A comparative study

João H. Lopes, Lucas P. Souza, Juliana A. Domingues, Filipe V. Ferreira, Moema de Alencar Hausen, José A. Camilli, Richard A. Martin, Eliana A. de Rezende Duek, Italo O. Mazali, Celso A. Bertran

Abstract

Abstract In vitro and in vivo experiments were undertaken to evaluate the solubility, apatite‐forming ability, cytocompatibility, osteostimulation, and osteoinduction for a series of Nb‐containing bioactive glass (BGNb) derived from composition of 45S5 Bioglass. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP‐OES) revealed that the rate at which Na, Ca, Si, P, and Nb species are leached from the glass decrease with the increasing concentration of the niobium oxide. The formation of apatite as a function of time in simulated body fluid was monitored by 31P Magic Angle Spinning (MAS) Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Results showed that the bioactive glasses: Bioglass 45S5 (BG45S5) and 1 mol%‐Nb‐containing‐bioactive glass (BGSN1) were able to grow apatite layer on their surfaces within 3 h, while glasses with higher concentrations of Nb2O5 (2.5 and 5 mol%) took at least 12 h. Nb‐substituted glasses were shown to be compatible with bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs). Moreover, the bioactive glass with 1 mol% Nb2O5 significantly enhanced cell proliferation after 4 days of treatment. Concentrations of 1 and 2.5 mol% Nb2O5 stimulated osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs after 21 days of treatment. For the in vivo experiments, trial glass rods were implanted into circular defects in rat tibia in order to evaluate their osteoconductivity and osteostimulation. Two morphometric parameters were analyzed: (a) thickness of new‐formed bone layer and (b) area of new‐formed subperiostal bone. Results showed that BGNb bioactive glass is osteoconductive and osteostimulative. Therefore, these results indicate that Nb‐substituted glass is suitable for biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Division of Fundamental Sciences (IEF) Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA) Sao Jose dos Campos Brazil

Department of Structural and Functional Biology Institute of Biology, University of Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas Brazil

School of Chemical Engineering University of Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas Brazil

Department of Physiological Sciences, Biomaterials Laboratory Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo Sorocaba Brazil

School of Engineering & Aston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing Aston University Birmingham UK

Department of Inorganic Chemistry Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas Brazil

Department of Physical Chemistry Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas – UNICAMP Campinas Brazil

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo · Laboratório Nacional de Nanotecnologia · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Universidade Estadual de Campinas

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.06210.1016/j.msec.2015.10.062 ↗
2. Boyan B. &Schwartz Z.(2000).Modulation of osteogenesis via implant surface design. In: Bone Engineering Davies JE (ed).EM Squared Inc. Toronto Canada 233–239.
3. Cacciotti I. · 2014 · 1
4. 10.1007/s10853-017-1010-010.1007/s10853-017-1010-0 ↗
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.541.4110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.541.41 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma807419110.3390/ma8074191 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.04410.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.044 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.b.3029510.1002/jbm.b.30295 ↗
10. 10.1186/s13287-018-0850-010.1186/s13287-018-0850-0 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.3710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.37 ↗
12. 10.1177/204173141877681910.1177/2041731418776819 ↗
13. 10.1039/C9NR05383B10.1039/C9NR05383B ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
15. 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
16. 10.3389/fbioe.2015.0019410.3389/fbioe.2015.00194 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10019000005510.1007/s100190000055 ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.82005061110.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
19. 10.1142/202810.1142/2028 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.01910.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.019 ↗
22. 10.1111/ijag.1225210.1111/ijag.12252 ↗
23. 10.2217/rme.15.2710.2217/rme.15.27 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.01010.1016/j.dental.2011.10.010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.05.01510.1016/j.addr.2012.05.015 ↗
26. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/5/05500110.1088/1748-6041/7/5/055001 ↗
27. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.541.1510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.541.15 ↗
28. Lopes J. H. · 2015
29. Lopes J. H. · 2016
30. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.02210.1016/j.msec.2018.12.022 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.04410.1016/j.msec.2016.11.044 ↗
32. 10.1111/jace.1322210.1111/jace.13222 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.02810.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.028 ↗
34. 10.1111/jace.1230510.1111/jace.12305 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.006 ↗
36. 10.1002/jbm.a.3460510.1002/jbm.a.34605 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10856-008-3661-510.1007/s10856-008-3661-5 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00275-110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00275-1 ↗
39. 10.1590/0103-644020170052510.1590/0103-6440201700525 ↗
40. 10.1021/am301614a10.1021/am301614a ↗
41. 10.1088/1748-6041/8/6/06500510.1088/1748-6041/8/6/065005 ↗
42. 10.1002/jbm.a.3643310.1002/jbm.a.36433 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41598-018-31114-010.1038/s41598-018-31114-0 ↗
44. Steele J. &Dalton B.(2000).Underlying mechanisms of cellular adhesion in vitro during colonization of synthetic surfaces by bone‐derived cells In Bone Engineering ed. J Davies. EM Square Toronto Canada.225–231.
45. 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.021110.1089/ten.tea.2013.0211 ↗
46. Wang G. C. Lu Z. F. Zreiqat H.(2014).8 ‐ Bioceramics for skeletal bone regeneration. In: Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials ed. Kajal B T ‐ Bone Substitute Biomaterials Mallick. Woodhead Publishing 180–216.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780857094971500081.10.1533/9780857099037.2.180 ↗
47. 10.12659/MSM.89704410.12659/MSM.897044 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10856-016-5755-910.1007/s10856-016-5755-9 ↗
49. 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<151::AID-JBM1001>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<151::AID-JBM1001>3.0.CO;2-D ↗