Investigation and Prediction of Nano-Silver Line Quality upon Various Process Parameters in Inkjet Printing Process Based on an Experimental Method
Source abstract
Abstract
As an emerging additive manufacturing technology, inkjet printing has been increasingly applied in microelectronics field. However, due to the impacting and rebounding behaviors of conductive ink droplets impinging onto flat substrates, it is challenging to fabricate conductive lines with desired quality, such as suitable line width and line thickness, and matching resistance when it is used for interconnecting multifarious electronic components if there is not a proper configuration of operating parameters. To address this research gap, this article aims to investigate the effect of process parameters on the quality of conductive lines, including the platform temperature, printing speed, number of layers, and delay time (droplet interarrival time), are selected to conduct a full factorial experiment. First, the approximate parameter ranges for ensuring the continuity of conductive lines are determined. Second, this study analyzes the interactive effect among process parameters on line quality. Third, an artificial neural network (ANN) is constructed to predict the quality of printed lines. Results show that the line width does not increase with an increased number of layers, while the line thickness shows an increasing trend. The low resistance and high aspect ratio of printed line are achieved by printing 5 layers with the platform temperature of 70°C, the delay time of 12.2 ms, and the printing speed of 1139.39 mm/min. Moreover, the ANN model can be used to predict line width and line thickness with excellent performance, except for the resistance due to the irregular line edge. This study provides a useful guide for the selection of appropriate printing parameters to realize a diverse range of quality properties for 3D printed conductive lines in integrated circuits.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Road Construction Technology and Equipment of MOE, Chang'an University, Xi'an, China.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Key Laboratory of 3D Printing Process and Equipment of Zhejiang Province, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature2549410.1038/nature25494 ↗
2. Cook BS Tehrani B Cooper JR et al. Integrated Printing for 2D/3D Flexible Organic Electronic Devices. In: Handbook of Flexible Organic Electronics. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge England; 2015; pp. 199–216.10.1016/B978-1-78242-035-4.00008-7 ↗
3. 10.1108/0305612031046077510.1108/03056120310460775 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10326310.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103263 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.03.02810.1016/j.aca.2020.03.028 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20140586410.1002/adma.201405864 ↗
7. 10.1039/C7TC00038C10.1039/C7TC00038C ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mne.2021.10010310.1016/j.mne.2021.100103 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.10.00610.1016/j.mee.2015.10.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mee.2010.12.09910.1016/j.mee.2010.12.099 ↗
11. 10.1109/TMTT.2011.212391010.1109/TMTT.2011.2123910 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cie.2019.10619410.1016/j.cie.2019.106194 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.02710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.02210.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mee.2017.02.00410.1016/j.mee.2017.02.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10396010.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103960 ↗
17. 10.3390/nano1103059910.3390/nano11030599 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.03.01410.1016/j.synthmet.2016.03.014 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12206-013-1179-310.1007/s12206-013-1179-3 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00542-013-1743-x10.1007/s00542-013-1743-x ↗
21. 10.1007/s11664-018-6418-z10.1007/s11664-018-6418-z ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cocis.2017.11.00410.1016/j.cocis.2017.11.004 ↗
23. Śliwiak M, , Bui R, , Brook MA, et al. 3D printing of highly reactive silicones using inkjet type droplet ejection and free space droplet merging and reaction. Addit Manuf, 2021; 46:102099.
24. 10.1063/1.221792910.1063/1.2217929 ↗
25. 10.1088/0960-1317/20/11/11500510.1088/0960-1317/20/11/115005 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.03.00110.1016/j.mfglet.2020.03.001 ↗
27. 10.2320/matertrans.MRA200721710.2320/matertrans.MRA2007217 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.01210.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.012 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.01610.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.016 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.04610.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.046 ↗
31. 10.3390/ijms2214771910.3390/ijms22147719 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.11110.1016/j.snb.2017.03.111 ↗
33. 10.1007/s12046-019-1146-510.1007/s12046-019-1146-5 ↗
34. 10.1088/1361-6439/aa7a7110.1088/1361-6439/aa7a71 ↗
35. 10.1039/C7TC00038C10.1039/C7TC00038C ↗
36. 10.1007/s11708-012-0214-x10.1007/s11708-012-0214-x ↗
37. 10.1007/s11434-010-3251-y10.1007/s11434-010-3251-y ↗
38. 10.3390/s1807217610.3390/s18072176 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10940810.1016/j.matdes.2020.109408 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10886910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108869 ↗
41. 10.1007/s11663-014-0288-410.1007/s11663-014-0288-4 ↗
42. Mellor S. Influence of drop velocity and droplet spacing on the equilibrium saturation level in binder jetting. Preprints 2021:2021010496.
43. 10.1108/1355254031047746310.1108/13552540310477463 ↗
44. Colton T, , Crane NB. Influence of droplet velocity, spacing, and inter-arrival time on line formation and saturation in binder jet additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2021; 37:101711.
45. Zhao D, , Zhou H, , Wang Y, et al. Drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjet dynamics of printing viscoelastic conductive ink. Addit Manuf, 2021; 48:102451.