Electrospun poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐based skin substitutes: In vivo evaluation of wound healing and the mechanism of cell proliferation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In the present study, we have fabricated electrospun poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐based membranes, characterized and studied the in vivo cell migration and proliferation and wound healing activity. Moreover, we did not seed any cells prior to the animal implantation and we could observe excellent fibroblast attachment and cell proliferation. Further full thickness excision wound on guinea pig completely healed within 35 days. We could reach in an assumption that the enhanced cell proliferation and wound healing might be due to the surface degradation of the polymer under physiological conditions and the formation of functional groups like hydroxyl and carboxyl groups that promoted cell proliferation in a cell adhesion protein mediated mechanism. This study is a novel tissue engineering concept for the reconstruction of a damaged tissue without the in vitro cell seeding and proliferation prior to the in vivo implantation. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 103B: 1445–1454, 2015.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Wound Healing and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam 686 560 Kerala India
Pushpagiri Research Centre, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre Tiruvalla 689 101 Kerala India
School of Pure and Applied Physics, Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam 686 560 Kerala India
School of Chemical Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University Kottayam 686 560 Kerala India
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40204-014-0030-y10.1007/s40204-014-0030-y ↗
2. AugustineR KalarikkalN ThomasSAn In vitro Method for the Determination of Microbial Barrier Property (MBP) of Porous Polymeric Membranes for Skin Substitute and Wound Dressing Applications Tissue Eng Regen Med2014; In press.10.1007/s13770-014-0032-9 ↗
3. 10.1201/b16415-810.1201/b16415-8 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.b.3000010.1002/jbm.b.30000 ↗
5. 10.1002/jbm.b.3012810.1002/jbm.b.30128 ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.b.3004110.1002/jbm.b.30041 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.b.3310310.1002/jbm.b.33103 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.b.3314110.1002/jbm.b.33141 ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.b.3302810.1002/jbm.b.33028 ↗
10. 10.4103/0970-0358.7071210.4103/0970-0358.70712 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.b.3171110.1002/jbm.b.31711 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.b.3009610.1002/jbm.b.30096 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.b.3301510.1002/jbm.b.33015 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.b.3070410.1002/jbm.b.30704 ↗
15. BurkeJF GordonPL HuangC YannasIV. U.S. Patent No. 4 060 081. Washington DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office;1977.
16. 10.1002/9783527652457.ch2710.1002/9783527652457.ch27 ↗
17. 10.1039/C4RA07361D10.1039/C4RA07361D ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.a.3454210.1002/jbm.a.34542 ↗
19. 10.1002/jbm.a.3514110.1002/jbm.a.35141 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10965-013-0347-610.1007/s10965-013-0347-6 ↗
21. 10.1039/c4ra02450h10.1039/c4ra02450h ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.b.3012210.1002/jbm.b.30122 ↗
23. 10.1021/bm050314k10.1021/bm050314k ↗
24. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199603)30:3<385::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199603)30:3<385::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
25. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.06.01910.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.06.019 ↗
26. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.047310.1089/ten.tea.2008.0473 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.02210.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.022 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00239.x10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00239.x ↗
29. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.84710.1089/ten.2005.11.847 ↗
30. 10.1002/jbm.82024060710.1002/jbm.820240607 ↗
31. 10.1166/jnn.2009.NS2710.1166/jnn.2009.NS27 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.01110.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.011 ↗
33. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.3510.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.35 ↗
34. 10.1177/00219983870210110410.1177/002199838702101104 ↗
35. 10.1002/pen.76026090910.1002/pen.760260909 ↗
36. 10.1002/jbm.1016710.1002/jbm.10167 ↗
37. 10.1167/iovs.13-1272710.1167/iovs.13-12727 ↗
38. 10.1163/15685620577457665510.1163/156856205774576655 ↗
39. 10.1163/156856209X41648510.1163/156856209X416485 ↗
40. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep1253277010.1111/1523-1747.ep12532770 ↗
41. 10.1006/jcis.1998.568810.1006/jcis.1998.5688 ↗
42. 10.1089/107632704134836510.1089/1076327041348365 ↗
43. Cell and platelet adhesions on plasma glow discharge‐treated poly(lactide‐co‐glycolide)
44. 10.1006/jcis.1999.652410.1006/jcis.1999.6524 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.03110.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.031 ↗
46. 10.1002/biot.20130019110.1002/biot.201300191 ↗
47. 10.1002/mabi.20130020310.1002/mabi.201300203 ↗
48. 10.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.00205310.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.002053 ↗
49. 10.1002/smll.20080164810.1002/smll.200801648 ↗
50. 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90752-V10.1016/0032-3861(93)90752-V ↗
51. 10.1002/jbm.b.3063810.1002/jbm.b.30638 ↗
52. 10.1163/156856299X0066710.1163/156856299X00667 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.05.01310.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.05.013 ↗
54. Pitt CG · 1980 · 19
55. 10.1021/la904663m10.1021/la904663m ↗
56. Substrate hydroxylation and cell adhesion10.1242/jcs.86.1.9 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.06910.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.069 ↗
58. 10.1002/jbm.a.1053710.1002/jbm.a.10537 ↗
59. 10.1016/0142-9612(91)90140-610.1016/0142-9612(91)90140-6 ↗
60. 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90169-410.1016/0142-9612(94)90169-4 ↗