Surface AFM microscopy of unworn and worn samples of silicone hydrogel contact lenses
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Purpose. To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative topographic changes in the surface of worn contact lenses (CLs) of different materials using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Methods. The topography of five different CL materials was evaluated with AFM over a surface of 25 μm2 according to previously published experimental setup. Average roughness (Ra) and root mean square (Rms) values were obtained for unworn and worn samples. Results. The Ra value increased for balafilcon A (11.62–13.68 nm for unworn and worn samples, respectively), lotrafilcon A (3.67–15.01 nm for unworn and worn samples, respectively), lotrafilcon B (4.08–8.42 nm for unworn and worn samples, respectively), galyfilcon A (2.81–14.6 nm for unworn and worn samples, respectively), and comfilcon A (2.87–4.63 nm for unworn and worn samples, respectively). Differences were statistically significant for all lenses except Rms and Ra for comfilcon A, and Ra parameter for balafilcon A (p > 0.05). The least relative increase was observed for some balafilcon A samples and for some of these samples the roughness decreased after the lenses had been worn. Conclusion. The changes in surface roughness between unworn and worn lenses are different for different silicone‐hydrogel materials. Overall all CLs increased the degree of surface roughness after being worn, even for very short periods of time. However, for samples of balafilcon A, roughness increases at a lower extent or even can decrease as compared to unworn samples of the same material due to filling of the macropores. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2009
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ocular Surface and Contact Lens · Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0892-8967(01)00060-810.1016/S0892-8967(01)00060-8 ↗
2. 10.1002/jbm.b.3038710.1002/jbm.b.30387 ↗
3. 10.1002/jbm.b.3038610.1002/jbm.b.30386 ↗
4. 10.1097/01.opx.0000135099.01664.3d10.1097/01.opx.0000135099.01664.3d ↗
5. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
6. Microscopic observations of silicone hydrogels with three different techniques
7. 10.1097/00140068-200301001-0002110.1097/00140068-200301001-00021 ↗
8. 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90118-L10.1016/0142-9612(93)90118-L ↗
9. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00292-710.1016/S0142-9612(01)00292-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/0142-9612(95)91089-H10.1016/0142-9612(95)91089-H ↗
11. Tighe B · 2004 · 1
12. Gonzalez‐MeijomeJM.Objective analysis of properties and material degradation in contact lens polymers using different techniques. PhD Thesis: University of Minho2007; Available from:http://hdl.handle.net/1822/6757.
13. 10.1002/jbm.1018610.1002/jbm.10186 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.clae.2007.02.01010.1016/j.clae.2007.02.010 ↗
15. Consistency of surface analysis of silicone‐hydrogel contact lens polymers with Atomic Force Microscopy
16. Hydrogel contact lens‐corneal interactions: A new mechanism for deposit formation and corneal injury
17. 10.1097/01.icl.0000235271.64089.8510.1097/01.icl.0000235271.64089.85 ↗
18. 10.1080/0271368060088879910.1080/02713680600888799 ↗
19. Lipid deposits on hydrophilic and rigid gas permeable contact lenses
20. 10.1097/01.opx.0000168585.53845.6410.1097/01.opx.0000168585.53845.64 ↗
21. 10.1385/1-59259-224-4:5310.1385/1-59259-224-4:53 ↗
22. 10.1002/jbm.b.3010010.1002/jbm.b.30100 ↗
23. 10.1097/01.ico.0000230324.28956.7710.1097/01.ico.0000230324.28956.77 ↗
24. 10.1097/00003226-199201000-0000810.1097/00003226-199201000-00008 ↗
25. 10.1001/archopht.1987.0106001011204110.1001/archopht.1987.01060010112041 ↗
26. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
27. 10.1097/00006324-200203000-0001310.1097/00006324-200203000-00013 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.01810.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.018 ↗
29. 10.1097/00140068-200301001-0001210.1097/00140068-200301001-00012 ↗